肺大细胞神经内分泌癌:一项基于人群的研究。

IF 42.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Journal of Clinical Oncology Pub Date : 2019-05-20 DOI:10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_SUPPL.E13122
C. Kinslow, M. May, T. Wang, S. Cheng
{"title":"肺大细胞神经内分泌癌:一项基于人群的研究。","authors":"C. Kinslow, M. May, T. Wang, S. Cheng","doi":"10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_SUPPL.E13122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"e13122 Background: In 2015, the World Health Organization dissolved the category of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that was previously known as “large cell carcinoma” into adeno- or squamous cell carcinomas, with the exception of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC), which is now grouped with other neuroendocrine carcinomas of the lung. There is limited data on the epidemiology and best treatment practices for this malignancy, and studies comparing prognosis with SCLC and NSCLC have been conflicting. Methods: We reviewed the epidemiology of LCNEC using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program from 2010 – 2015. Demographical features and overall survival were compared with SCLC and NSCLC. Trends in incidence and mortality rates were observed from 2004 – 2015. Results: We analyzed 195,148 cases of lung cancer, including 1,681 (0.9%) cases of LCNEC. Age-adjusted incidence of LCNEC was 0.31 per 100,000 people and had increased by 50% over the period studied. This increased incidence was primarily the result of increased incidence of stage IV disease. LCNEC was more likely to present with brain metastasis at diagnosis (19.2%) than either SCLC (16.7%, p = .01) or NSCLC (13.0%, p < .001). Survival patterns for LCNEC mirrored NSCLC in stage I – III disease and SCLC in stage IV disease. After adjusting for other clinical and demographic variables, survival for LCNEC was not different than SCLC but worse than NSCLC (HR = 0.88 for NSCLC vs. LCNEC, p < .001). Survival rates for LCNEC and SCLC did not significantly change over the time period studied, whereas survival rates for NSCLC significantly improved. Consistent with our findings of increased incidence of LCNEC with no change in survival patterns, age-adjusted incidence-based mortality increased by two-fold over the time period studied. Conclusions: LCNEC generally has a worse prognosis than NSCLC and better than SCLC. LCNEC presents with brain metastases more frequently than SCLC. Incidence of LCNEC is consistently increasing in the U.S. Despite this, it remains poorly studied and prognosis for LCNEC has not improved with time. LCNEC has, therefore, become an increasing cause of lung cancer mortality in the American population.","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":42.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung: A population-based study.\",\"authors\":\"C. Kinslow, M. May, T. Wang, S. Cheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_SUPPL.E13122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"e13122 Background: In 2015, the World Health Organization dissolved the category of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that was previously known as “large cell carcinoma” into adeno- or squamous cell carcinomas, with the exception of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC), which is now grouped with other neuroendocrine carcinomas of the lung. There is limited data on the epidemiology and best treatment practices for this malignancy, and studies comparing prognosis with SCLC and NSCLC have been conflicting. Methods: We reviewed the epidemiology of LCNEC using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program from 2010 – 2015. Demographical features and overall survival were compared with SCLC and NSCLC. Trends in incidence and mortality rates were observed from 2004 – 2015. Results: We analyzed 195,148 cases of lung cancer, including 1,681 (0.9%) cases of LCNEC. Age-adjusted incidence of LCNEC was 0.31 per 100,000 people and had increased by 50% over the period studied. This increased incidence was primarily the result of increased incidence of stage IV disease. LCNEC was more likely to present with brain metastasis at diagnosis (19.2%) than either SCLC (16.7%, p = .01) or NSCLC (13.0%, p < .001). Survival patterns for LCNEC mirrored NSCLC in stage I – III disease and SCLC in stage IV disease. After adjusting for other clinical and demographic variables, survival for LCNEC was not different than SCLC but worse than NSCLC (HR = 0.88 for NSCLC vs. LCNEC, p < .001). Survival rates for LCNEC and SCLC did not significantly change over the time period studied, whereas survival rates for NSCLC significantly improved. Consistent with our findings of increased incidence of LCNEC with no change in survival patterns, age-adjusted incidence-based mortality increased by two-fold over the time period studied. Conclusions: LCNEC generally has a worse prognosis than NSCLC and better than SCLC. LCNEC presents with brain metastases more frequently than SCLC. Incidence of LCNEC is consistently increasing in the U.S. Despite this, it remains poorly studied and prognosis for LCNEC has not improved with time. LCNEC has, therefore, become an increasing cause of lung cancer mortality in the American population.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":42.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_SUPPL.E13122\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_SUPPL.E13122","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

e13122背景:2015年,世界卫生组织将之前被称为“大细胞癌”的非小细胞肺癌癌症类别分解为腺癌或鳞状细胞癌,但大细胞神经内分泌癌(LCNEC)除外,后者现在与其他肺神经内分泌癌归为一类。关于这种恶性肿瘤的流行病学和最佳治疗方法的数据有限,将预后与小细胞肺癌和非小细胞肺癌进行比较的研究一直存在矛盾。方法:我们使用2010-2015年监测、流行病学和最终结果计划的数据回顾了LCNEC的流行病学。将人口学特征和总生存率与SCLC和NSCLC进行比较。从2004年至2015年观察到发病率和死亡率的趋势。结果:我们分析了195148例癌症,包括1681例(0.9%)LCNEC。经年龄调整的LCNEC发病率为每100000人0.31例,在研究期间增加了50%。发病率的增加主要是IV期疾病发病率增加的结果。LCNEC在诊断时(19.2%)比SCLC(16.7%,p=0.01)或NSCLC(13.0%,p<0.01)更有可能出现脑转移。LCNEC的生存模式反映了I-III期疾病中的NSCLC和IV期疾病中SCLC。在调整了其他临床和人口统计学变量后,LCNEC的生存率与SCLC没有差异,但比NSCLC差(NSCLC与LCNEC的HR=0.88,p<.001)。在研究的时间段内,LCNEC和SCLC的生存率没有显著变化,而NSCLC的生存率显著提高。与我们的研究结果一致,LCNEC的发病率增加,而生存模式没有变化,在研究的时间段内,基于年龄调整的发病率死亡率增加了两倍。结论:LCNEC的预后一般比NSCLC差,比SCLC好。LCNEC表现为脑转移的频率高于SCLC。在美国,LCNEC的发病率一直在增加。尽管如此,它的研究仍然很差,而且LCNEC的预后并没有随着时间的推移而改善。因此,LCNEC已成为美国人口中日益增加的癌症死亡率的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung: A population-based study.
e13122 Background: In 2015, the World Health Organization dissolved the category of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that was previously known as “large cell carcinoma” into adeno- or squamous cell carcinomas, with the exception of large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC), which is now grouped with other neuroendocrine carcinomas of the lung. There is limited data on the epidemiology and best treatment practices for this malignancy, and studies comparing prognosis with SCLC and NSCLC have been conflicting. Methods: We reviewed the epidemiology of LCNEC using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program from 2010 – 2015. Demographical features and overall survival were compared with SCLC and NSCLC. Trends in incidence and mortality rates were observed from 2004 – 2015. Results: We analyzed 195,148 cases of lung cancer, including 1,681 (0.9%) cases of LCNEC. Age-adjusted incidence of LCNEC was 0.31 per 100,000 people and had increased by 50% over the period studied. This increased incidence was primarily the result of increased incidence of stage IV disease. LCNEC was more likely to present with brain metastasis at diagnosis (19.2%) than either SCLC (16.7%, p = .01) or NSCLC (13.0%, p < .001). Survival patterns for LCNEC mirrored NSCLC in stage I – III disease and SCLC in stage IV disease. After adjusting for other clinical and demographic variables, survival for LCNEC was not different than SCLC but worse than NSCLC (HR = 0.88 for NSCLC vs. LCNEC, p < .001). Survival rates for LCNEC and SCLC did not significantly change over the time period studied, whereas survival rates for NSCLC significantly improved. Consistent with our findings of increased incidence of LCNEC with no change in survival patterns, age-adjusted incidence-based mortality increased by two-fold over the time period studied. Conclusions: LCNEC generally has a worse prognosis than NSCLC and better than SCLC. LCNEC presents with brain metastases more frequently than SCLC. Incidence of LCNEC is consistently increasing in the U.S. Despite this, it remains poorly studied and prognosis for LCNEC has not improved with time. LCNEC has, therefore, become an increasing cause of lung cancer mortality in the American population.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Journal of Clinical Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
41.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
8215
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Oncology serves its readers as the single most credible, authoritative resource for disseminating significant clinical oncology research. In print and in electronic format, JCO strives to publish the highest quality articles dedicated to clinical research. Original Reports remain the focus of JCO, but this scientific communication is enhanced by appropriately selected Editorials, Commentaries, Reviews, and other work that relate to the care of patients with cancer.
期刊最新文献
Can We Offset Local Recurrence in Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer? The Merry-Go-Round of Radiation Dose Escalation and Stubborn Outcomes. Denosumab Prevents Bone Loss and Microarchitectural Deterioration in Premenopausal Women With Breast Cancer Receiving Estradiol Suppression Therapy. Erratum: CML and the WHO: Why? Evaluation and Surgical Management of Pediatric Cutaneous Melanoma and Atypical Spitz and Non-Spitz Melanocytic Tumors (Melanocytomas): A Report From Children's Oncology Group. Glofitamab in Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Results From a Phase I/II Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1