人工智能的政治:发展中国家的民主与威权主义

IF 2.6 2区 社会学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Journal of Information Technology & Politics Pub Date : 2022-02-02 DOI:10.1080/19331681.2021.2016543
Fernando Filgueiras
{"title":"人工智能的政治:发展中国家的民主与威权主义","authors":"Fernando Filgueiras","doi":"10.1080/19331681.2021.2016543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Developing AI technologies has been a priority for governments worldwide, mobilizing actors to build strategies and policies to accelerate and deploy AI in industry, markets, and governments. With that in mind, this paper analyzes the causal mechanism between political regimes’ institutional dynamics and AI’s development. Specifically, it compares 30 developing countries to understand the political and governance dynamics that explain the outcomes achieved with AI policy. Delving into the relationship between politics and policy, this paper reflects on how different institutional frameworks produce different results in terms of AI development. The research was based on data from the Bertelsmann Stiftung’s Transformation Index (BTI) and the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), using fuzzy-set quantitative comparative analysis (QCA) to analyze cases. The findings point to authoritarian countries performing better in producing AI development outcomes.","PeriodicalId":47047,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information Technology & Politics","volume":"19 1","pages":"449 - 464"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The politics of AI: democracy and authoritarianism in developing countries\",\"authors\":\"Fernando Filgueiras\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19331681.2021.2016543\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Developing AI technologies has been a priority for governments worldwide, mobilizing actors to build strategies and policies to accelerate and deploy AI in industry, markets, and governments. With that in mind, this paper analyzes the causal mechanism between political regimes’ institutional dynamics and AI’s development. Specifically, it compares 30 developing countries to understand the political and governance dynamics that explain the outcomes achieved with AI policy. Delving into the relationship between politics and policy, this paper reflects on how different institutional frameworks produce different results in terms of AI development. The research was based on data from the Bertelsmann Stiftung’s Transformation Index (BTI) and the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), using fuzzy-set quantitative comparative analysis (QCA) to analyze cases. The findings point to authoritarian countries performing better in producing AI development outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Information Technology & Politics\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"449 - 464\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Information Technology & Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2021.2016543\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information Technology & Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2021.2016543","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

开发人工智能技术一直是世界各国政府的优先事项,动员各方制定战略和政策,以加速人工智能在工业、市场和政府中的部署。有鉴于此,本文分析了政治体制的制度动态与人工智能发展之间的因果机制。具体而言,它比较了30个发展中国家,以了解解释人工智能政策取得成果的政治和治理动态。本文深入研究了政治与政策之间的关系,反思了不同的制度框架如何在人工智能发展方面产生不同的结果。该研究基于贝塔斯曼基金会(Bertelsmann Stiftung)的转型指数(BTI)和经济合作与发展组织(OECD)的数据,使用模糊集定量比较分析(QCA)来分析案例。研究结果表明,专制国家在产生人工智能发展成果方面表现更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The politics of AI: democracy and authoritarianism in developing countries
ABSTRACT Developing AI technologies has been a priority for governments worldwide, mobilizing actors to build strategies and policies to accelerate and deploy AI in industry, markets, and governments. With that in mind, this paper analyzes the causal mechanism between political regimes’ institutional dynamics and AI’s development. Specifically, it compares 30 developing countries to understand the political and governance dynamics that explain the outcomes achieved with AI policy. Delving into the relationship between politics and policy, this paper reflects on how different institutional frameworks produce different results in terms of AI development. The research was based on data from the Bertelsmann Stiftung’s Transformation Index (BTI) and the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), using fuzzy-set quantitative comparative analysis (QCA) to analyze cases. The findings point to authoritarian countries performing better in producing AI development outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
Partisan news recommendations. Studying the effect of politicians’ online news sharing on news credibility From tweets to tensions: exploring the roots of political polarization in Turkish constitutional referendum Self-interest and preferences for the regulation of artificial intelligence Critical social media and political engagement in authoritarian regimes: the role of state media fairness perceptions Social media and political contention - challenges and opportunities for comparative research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1