{"title":"俾格米人、布什曼人和野蛮人的数字——一系列不良引用的案例研究","authors":"Antti J.V. Tuominen","doi":"10.1016/j.hm.2022.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There is a prevalent claim in the literature examining the history of numbers and the development of number words that some African group (“Bushmen” or “Pygmies”) counts in a particular way, where their numerals are of the form 1, 2, 3, 2+2, 2+2+1, etc. Numerous forms of this claim are traced back to their original sources through an extensive search of the available literature. The author argues that the different forms can be traced back to two early sources, which have been misquoted and bastardized along the way.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51061,"journal":{"name":"Historia Mathematica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pygmies, Bushmen, and savage numbers – a case study in a sequence of bad citations\",\"authors\":\"Antti J.V. Tuominen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hm.2022.10.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>There is a prevalent claim in the literature examining the history of numbers and the development of number words that some African group (“Bushmen” or “Pygmies”) counts in a particular way, where their numerals are of the form 1, 2, 3, 2+2, 2+2+1, etc. Numerous forms of this claim are traced back to their original sources through an extensive search of the available literature. The author argues that the different forms can be traced back to two early sources, which have been misquoted and bastardized along the way.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Historia Mathematica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Historia Mathematica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0315086022000672\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historia Mathematica","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0315086022000672","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pygmies, Bushmen, and savage numbers – a case study in a sequence of bad citations
There is a prevalent claim in the literature examining the history of numbers and the development of number words that some African group (“Bushmen” or “Pygmies”) counts in a particular way, where their numerals are of the form 1, 2, 3, 2+2, 2+2+1, etc. Numerous forms of this claim are traced back to their original sources through an extensive search of the available literature. The author argues that the different forms can be traced back to two early sources, which have been misquoted and bastardized along the way.
期刊介绍:
Historia Mathematica publishes historical scholarship on mathematics and its development in all cultures and time periods. In particular, the journal encourages informed studies on mathematicians and their work in historical context, on the histories of institutions and organizations supportive of the mathematical endeavor, on historiographical topics in the history of mathematics, and on the interrelations between mathematical ideas, science, and the broader culture.