{"title":"塔楼兄弟会:论马穆鲁克种姓的空间性","authors":"N. Rabbat","doi":"10.1162/thld_a_00715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"in Mamluk Egypt and Syria (London: I. B. Tauris, 2010), 12-19; Rabbat, “Perception of Architecture in Mamluk Sources,” Mamluk Studies Review 6 (2002): 155-76. Ulrich Haarmann, “Rather the Injustice of the Turks than the Righteousness of the Arabs— Changing ‘Ulama’ Attitudes Towards Mamluk Rule in the Late Fifteenth-Century,” Studia Islamica 68 (1989): 61-79, notices a change in the late Mamluk period, which is nonetheless limited to few unusual individuals; Konrad Hirschler, “Studying Mamluk Historiography. From SourceCriticism to the Cultural Turn,” in Ubi sumus? Quo vademus? Mamluk Studies—State of the Art, ed. Stephan Conermann (Bonn: V&R Unipress, Bonn University Press, 2013), 159-86, suggests new ways of dealing with Mamluk sources. 4 On Tibaqs and qa‘as, as well as the division of mamluks according to function or ethnicity, see Rabbat, The Citadel of Cairo: A New Interpretation of Royal Mamluk Architecture, (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1995), 11019, 138-42, 283-91. BROTHERHOOD OF THE TOWERS: ON THE SPATIALITY OF THE MAMLUK CASTE","PeriodicalId":40067,"journal":{"name":"Thresholds","volume":"1 1","pages":"116-121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brotherhood of the Towers: On the Spatiality of the Mamluk Caste\",\"authors\":\"N. Rabbat\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/thld_a_00715\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"in Mamluk Egypt and Syria (London: I. B. Tauris, 2010), 12-19; Rabbat, “Perception of Architecture in Mamluk Sources,” Mamluk Studies Review 6 (2002): 155-76. Ulrich Haarmann, “Rather the Injustice of the Turks than the Righteousness of the Arabs— Changing ‘Ulama’ Attitudes Towards Mamluk Rule in the Late Fifteenth-Century,” Studia Islamica 68 (1989): 61-79, notices a change in the late Mamluk period, which is nonetheless limited to few unusual individuals; Konrad Hirschler, “Studying Mamluk Historiography. From SourceCriticism to the Cultural Turn,” in Ubi sumus? Quo vademus? Mamluk Studies—State of the Art, ed. Stephan Conermann (Bonn: V&R Unipress, Bonn University Press, 2013), 159-86, suggests new ways of dealing with Mamluk sources. 4 On Tibaqs and qa‘as, as well as the division of mamluks according to function or ethnicity, see Rabbat, The Citadel of Cairo: A New Interpretation of Royal Mamluk Architecture, (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1995), 11019, 138-42, 283-91. BROTHERHOOD OF THE TOWERS: ON THE SPATIALITY OF THE MAMLUK CASTE\",\"PeriodicalId\":40067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thresholds\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"116-121\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thresholds\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1162/thld_a_00715\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thresholds","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/thld_a_00715","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Brotherhood of the Towers: On the Spatiality of the Mamluk Caste
in Mamluk Egypt and Syria (London: I. B. Tauris, 2010), 12-19; Rabbat, “Perception of Architecture in Mamluk Sources,” Mamluk Studies Review 6 (2002): 155-76. Ulrich Haarmann, “Rather the Injustice of the Turks than the Righteousness of the Arabs— Changing ‘Ulama’ Attitudes Towards Mamluk Rule in the Late Fifteenth-Century,” Studia Islamica 68 (1989): 61-79, notices a change in the late Mamluk period, which is nonetheless limited to few unusual individuals; Konrad Hirschler, “Studying Mamluk Historiography. From SourceCriticism to the Cultural Turn,” in Ubi sumus? Quo vademus? Mamluk Studies—State of the Art, ed. Stephan Conermann (Bonn: V&R Unipress, Bonn University Press, 2013), 159-86, suggests new ways of dealing with Mamluk sources. 4 On Tibaqs and qa‘as, as well as the division of mamluks according to function or ethnicity, see Rabbat, The Citadel of Cairo: A New Interpretation of Royal Mamluk Architecture, (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1995), 11019, 138-42, 283-91. BROTHERHOOD OF THE TOWERS: ON THE SPATIALITY OF THE MAMLUK CASTE