危机期间公共部门组织的管理人员和远程工作

IF 3.1 4区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT Journal of Management & Organization Pub Date : 2021-11-01 DOI:10.1017/jmo.2022.1
Ed Dandalt
{"title":"危机期间公共部门组织的管理人员和远程工作","authors":"Ed Dandalt","doi":"10.1017/jmo.2022.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Through the use of a narrative-interview approach and contingency theory as research methods, this study explores the teleworking behaviors of N = 41 public managers when remotely managing and leading their organizations as virtual bureaucracies during the Covid-19 lockdown. Its findings suggest that their role set was underscored by communal and supervisory tasks. Managers were confronted with environmental challenges of emotional nature (e.g., anxieties). But they also associated teleworking with improving their work-life balance and staffing work process. Simply put, teleworking was perceived with having both positive and negative organizational outcomes. Drawing from the implications of these findings, this study proposes recommendations for future research.","PeriodicalId":47612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management & Organization","volume":"27 1","pages":"1169 - 1182"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Managers and telework in public sector organizations during a crisis\",\"authors\":\"Ed Dandalt\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/jmo.2022.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Through the use of a narrative-interview approach and contingency theory as research methods, this study explores the teleworking behaviors of N = 41 public managers when remotely managing and leading their organizations as virtual bureaucracies during the Covid-19 lockdown. Its findings suggest that their role set was underscored by communal and supervisory tasks. Managers were confronted with environmental challenges of emotional nature (e.g., anxieties). But they also associated teleworking with improving their work-life balance and staffing work process. Simply put, teleworking was perceived with having both positive and negative organizational outcomes. Drawing from the implications of these findings, this study proposes recommendations for future research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Management & Organization\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"1169 - 1182\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Management & Organization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2022.1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management & Organization","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2022.1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

本研究采用叙述性访谈法和权变理论作为研究方法,探讨了N = 41名公共管理者在新冠肺炎疫情封锁期间远程管理和领导虚拟官僚机构时的远程工作行为。研究结果表明,他们的角色设定是由社区和监督任务所强调的。管理者面临着情绪性的环境挑战(例如,焦虑)。但他们也将远程办公与改善工作与生活的平衡和人员配置工作流程联系起来。简而言之,人们认为远程办公对组织的影响既有积极的一面,也有消极的一面。根据这些发现的含义,本研究提出了对未来研究的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Managers and telework in public sector organizations during a crisis
Abstract Through the use of a narrative-interview approach and contingency theory as research methods, this study explores the teleworking behaviors of N = 41 public managers when remotely managing and leading their organizations as virtual bureaucracies during the Covid-19 lockdown. Its findings suggest that their role set was underscored by communal and supervisory tasks. Managers were confronted with environmental challenges of emotional nature (e.g., anxieties). But they also associated teleworking with improving their work-life balance and staffing work process. Simply put, teleworking was perceived with having both positive and negative organizational outcomes. Drawing from the implications of these findings, this study proposes recommendations for future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: The Journal of Management & Organization is an international peer-reviewed journal from eContent, in association with ANZAM. It provides global perspectives on management and organization of benefit to scholars, educators, students, practitioners, policy-makers and consultants worldwide. In one forum, Journal of Management & Organization covers: •Qualitative and quantitative empirical research articles •Theoretical and conceptual articles •Literature reviews - including those from theses •Articles on management education and learning •Practitioner perspectives and case studies •Methodological advances - including those from theses
期刊最新文献
Applying a person-oriented approach to workplace aggression: Implications for employee emotional well-being Psychological need satisfaction, frustration, and unfulfillment profiles in the workplace: Their nature, predictors, and outcomes Communicate or not: Exploring the different effects of instrumental and expressive networks on thriving at work Firm performance feedback and organizational impression management: The moderating role of CEO overconfidence Escaping the organization: Examining the influence of supervisor bottom-line mentality on employee withdrawal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1