David Bilchitz的“企业的基本权利和法律义务”

Q1 Arts and Humanities Australian Journal of Human Rights Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/1323238X.2022.2124503
Selwyn Coles
{"title":"David Bilchitz的“企业的基本权利和法律义务”","authors":"Selwyn Coles","doi":"10.1080/1323238X.2022.2124503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT It is now widely acknowledged that corporations significantly impact the fundamental rights of individuals; and so they should carry (negative, and possibly also positive) obligations with respect to those fundamental rights. Yet the literature has largely neglected the critical follow-up question: how do we determine the content of those obligations in particular situations? Bilchitz takes up that challenge in his magisterial new work, Fundamental Rights and the Legal Obligations of Business, which is the subject of this review essay. His key contribution is providing a structured process of reasoning to guide decision-makers in concrete contexts. This reasoning process involves the identification of various normative factors to guide the determination of corporate obligations which then must be balanced according to two structured tests for positive and negative obligations respectively. This paper summarises Bilchitz’s core arguments in some detail, attempts to distil the ‘heart’ of his strategic project, and then concludes by raising several critical points for discussion.","PeriodicalId":37430,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Human Rights","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"David Bilchitz’s ‘Fundamental Rights and the Legal Obligations of Business’\",\"authors\":\"Selwyn Coles\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1323238X.2022.2124503\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT It is now widely acknowledged that corporations significantly impact the fundamental rights of individuals; and so they should carry (negative, and possibly also positive) obligations with respect to those fundamental rights. Yet the literature has largely neglected the critical follow-up question: how do we determine the content of those obligations in particular situations? Bilchitz takes up that challenge in his magisterial new work, Fundamental Rights and the Legal Obligations of Business, which is the subject of this review essay. His key contribution is providing a structured process of reasoning to guide decision-makers in concrete contexts. This reasoning process involves the identification of various normative factors to guide the determination of corporate obligations which then must be balanced according to two structured tests for positive and negative obligations respectively. This paper summarises Bilchitz’s core arguments in some detail, attempts to distil the ‘heart’ of his strategic project, and then concludes by raising several critical points for discussion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Human Rights\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Human Rights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1323238X.2022.2124503\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Human Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1323238X.2022.2124503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要现在人们普遍认为,公司对个人的基本权利产生了重大影响;因此,他们应该对这些基本权利承担(消极的,也可能是积极的)义务。然而,文献在很大程度上忽略了关键的后续问题:我们如何在特定情况下确定这些义务的内容?Bilchitz在他的权威新作《企业的基本权利和法律义务》中接受了这一挑战,这也是本文的主题。他的主要贡献是提供一个结构化的推理过程,在具体情况下指导决策者。这个推理过程涉及识别各种规范性因素,以指导公司义务的确定,然后必须根据分别对积极义务和消极义务的两个结构化测试来平衡这些因素。本文详细总结了Bilchitz的核心论点,试图提炼出他的战略项目的“核心”,然后提出了几个关键点进行讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
David Bilchitz’s ‘Fundamental Rights and the Legal Obligations of Business’
ABSTRACT It is now widely acknowledged that corporations significantly impact the fundamental rights of individuals; and so they should carry (negative, and possibly also positive) obligations with respect to those fundamental rights. Yet the literature has largely neglected the critical follow-up question: how do we determine the content of those obligations in particular situations? Bilchitz takes up that challenge in his magisterial new work, Fundamental Rights and the Legal Obligations of Business, which is the subject of this review essay. His key contribution is providing a structured process of reasoning to guide decision-makers in concrete contexts. This reasoning process involves the identification of various normative factors to guide the determination of corporate obligations which then must be balanced according to two structured tests for positive and negative obligations respectively. This paper summarises Bilchitz’s core arguments in some detail, attempts to distil the ‘heart’ of his strategic project, and then concludes by raising several critical points for discussion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Journal of Human Rights
Australian Journal of Human Rights Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of Human Rights (AJHR) is Australia’s first peer reviewed journal devoted exclusively to human rights development in Australia, the Asia-Pacific region and internationally. The journal aims to raise awareness of human rights issues in Australia and the Asia-Pacific region by providing a forum for scholarship and discussion. The AJHR examines legal aspects of human rights, along with associated philosophical, historical, economic and political considerations, across a range of issues, including aboriginal ownership of land, racial discrimination and vilification, human rights in the criminal justice system, children’s rights, homelessness, immigration, asylum and detention, corporate accountability, disability standards and free speech.
期刊最新文献
An end to the patchwork quilt? The guarded potential of the PJCHR’s inquiry into Australia’s human rights framework The challenge of 21st-century populism Populism and Human Rights in a Turbulent Era , edited by Alison Brysk, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2023, 206 pp., $212.10 (hardback), ISBN 9781802209532 Human rights in Palestine: from self-determination to governance Contested rights, unequal citizens: how the Constitution presents paradoxes and hopes of equality for India’s Muslim minority Refracting rights from the margins: re-shifting, re-scripting, re-inventing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1