内镜逆行胰胆管造影患者胆总管结石临床、生化和放射学预测因素的敏感性和特异性:二元逻辑回归分析

Electronic Physician Pub Date : 2019-12-01 DOI:10.19082/7610
Hanan M. Alrammah, Hajar Ibrahim Alshmas, M. Abdelwahab, Arwa Ghaith Mahfouz, Malak O. Almulla, Basmah S. Alzahrani, Hind Kefah Alfaddagh, Mohamad Anas Hussam Eddin
{"title":"内镜逆行胰胆管造影患者胆总管结石临床、生化和放射学预测因素的敏感性和特异性:二元逻辑回归分析","authors":"Hanan M. Alrammah, Hajar Ibrahim Alshmas, M. Abdelwahab, Arwa Ghaith Mahfouz, Malak O. Almulla, Basmah S. Alzahrani, Hind Kefah Alfaddagh, Mohamad Anas Hussam Eddin","doi":"10.19082/7610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Gallbladder stones are one of the most common of today's health-related problems. Prediction of Common Bile Duct Stones (CBDS) permits better management of those patients. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of various predictors of CBDS. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on patients who underwent Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for suspected CBDS at King Fahd Hospital of the University (Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia from 2006 to 2018. Based on the presence or absence of specific predictive features as per the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) guidelines, we stratified the patients into high, intermediate, and low-risk of harboring CBDS. Data were analyzed by IBM© SPSS© version 21, using Chisquare test, Mann–Whitney U test, Wilcoxon signed rank test, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Also, binary logistic regression was performed to determine the independent predictors, and p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated for potential predictors of CBD stones. Results: One hundred forty-two patients were included in the study, 76 patients (53.5%) had choledocholithiasis [64.4% males, 45.8% females (p=0.028)] and 66 patients (46.5%) had normal CBD on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. In the choledocholithiasis group, the proportion of jaundice was significantly higher 61% (p=0.037), abdominal pain was reported in 54.7% of the patients (p=0.126), itching in 75% (p=0.119), change in the color of stool and urine was reported in 57.1% (p=0.718), 61.4% (p=0.209) of the patients, respectively. Positive Murphy's sign was seen in 37.4% of the patients who had CBDS (p=0.234). Visualization of CBD stones on trans-abdominal ultrasonography was the best predictor for the presence of CBDS (adjusted OR: 4.744, sensitivity: 34%, specificity: 92%, p<0.0001), followed by CBD diameter (adjusted OR: 1.350, sensitivity: 82%, specificity: 49%, p=0.000). Among Liver function tests (LFTs), total bilirubin >1.8 mg/dl, direct bilirubin >2 mg/dl, GGTP >281 U/L, and ALP >149 U/L are considered reliable predictors for choledocholithiasis. Conclusion: Visualization of CBD stones on trans-abdominal ultrasonography was the best predictor for the presence of CBDS followed by CBD diameter. CBD diameter ≥7 mm on ultrasonography in cases that the patient did not undergo cholecystectomy and more than 1 cm in cases that the patient underwent cholecystectomy are suggestive of CBDS. In presence of either conditions, we suggest proceeding to more invasive and therapeutic procedures such as ERCP.","PeriodicalId":11603,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Physician","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sensitivity and specificity of clinical, biochemical, and radiological predictors of common bile duct stones in patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a binary logistic regression analysis\",\"authors\":\"Hanan M. Alrammah, Hajar Ibrahim Alshmas, M. Abdelwahab, Arwa Ghaith Mahfouz, Malak O. Almulla, Basmah S. Alzahrani, Hind Kefah Alfaddagh, Mohamad Anas Hussam Eddin\",\"doi\":\"10.19082/7610\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Gallbladder stones are one of the most common of today's health-related problems. Prediction of Common Bile Duct Stones (CBDS) permits better management of those patients. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of various predictors of CBDS. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on patients who underwent Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for suspected CBDS at King Fahd Hospital of the University (Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia from 2006 to 2018. Based on the presence or absence of specific predictive features as per the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) guidelines, we stratified the patients into high, intermediate, and low-risk of harboring CBDS. Data were analyzed by IBM© SPSS© version 21, using Chisquare test, Mann–Whitney U test, Wilcoxon signed rank test, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Also, binary logistic regression was performed to determine the independent predictors, and p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated for potential predictors of CBD stones. Results: One hundred forty-two patients were included in the study, 76 patients (53.5%) had choledocholithiasis [64.4% males, 45.8% females (p=0.028)] and 66 patients (46.5%) had normal CBD on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. In the choledocholithiasis group, the proportion of jaundice was significantly higher 61% (p=0.037), abdominal pain was reported in 54.7% of the patients (p=0.126), itching in 75% (p=0.119), change in the color of stool and urine was reported in 57.1% (p=0.718), 61.4% (p=0.209) of the patients, respectively. Positive Murphy's sign was seen in 37.4% of the patients who had CBDS (p=0.234). Visualization of CBD stones on trans-abdominal ultrasonography was the best predictor for the presence of CBDS (adjusted OR: 4.744, sensitivity: 34%, specificity: 92%, p<0.0001), followed by CBD diameter (adjusted OR: 1.350, sensitivity: 82%, specificity: 49%, p=0.000). Among Liver function tests (LFTs), total bilirubin >1.8 mg/dl, direct bilirubin >2 mg/dl, GGTP >281 U/L, and ALP >149 U/L are considered reliable predictors for choledocholithiasis. Conclusion: Visualization of CBD stones on trans-abdominal ultrasonography was the best predictor for the presence of CBDS followed by CBD diameter. CBD diameter ≥7 mm on ultrasonography in cases that the patient did not undergo cholecystectomy and more than 1 cm in cases that the patient underwent cholecystectomy are suggestive of CBDS. In presence of either conditions, we suggest proceeding to more invasive and therapeutic procedures such as ERCP.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11603,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electronic Physician\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electronic Physician\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19082/7610\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Physician","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19082/7610","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胆囊结石是当今最常见的健康问题之一。预测胆总管结石(CBDS)可以更好地治疗这些患者。目的:本研究的目的是确定CBDS各种预测因素的敏感性和特异性。方法:这项横断面研究是对2006年至2018年在沙特阿拉伯Al Khobar大学法赫德国王医院接受内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)治疗疑似CBDS的患者进行的。根据美国胃肠道内窥镜学会(ASGE)指南,根据是否存在特定的预测特征,我们将患者分为携带CBDS的高风险、中风险和低风险。数据由IBM©SPSS©21版使用Chisquare检验、Mann-Whitney U检验、Wilcoxon符号秩检验和受试者操作特征曲线分析进行分析。此外,还进行了二元逻辑回归来确定独立的预测因素,p值1.8 mg/dl、直接胆红素>2 mg/dl、GGTP>281 U/L和ALP>149 U/L被认为是胆总管结石的可靠预测因素。结论:经腹部超声显示CBD结石是判断是否存在CBDS的最佳预测指标,其次是CBD直径。在患者未进行胆囊切除术的情况下,超声检查中CBD直径≥7mm,在患者进行胆囊切除手术的情况下超过1cm,提示CBDS。在存在任何一种情况的情况下,我们建议进行更具侵入性和治疗性的手术,如ERCP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sensitivity and specificity of clinical, biochemical, and radiological predictors of common bile duct stones in patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a binary logistic regression analysis
Background: Gallbladder stones are one of the most common of today's health-related problems. Prediction of Common Bile Duct Stones (CBDS) permits better management of those patients. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of various predictors of CBDS. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on patients who underwent Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for suspected CBDS at King Fahd Hospital of the University (Al-Khobar, Saudi Arabia from 2006 to 2018. Based on the presence or absence of specific predictive features as per the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) guidelines, we stratified the patients into high, intermediate, and low-risk of harboring CBDS. Data were analyzed by IBM© SPSS© version 21, using Chisquare test, Mann–Whitney U test, Wilcoxon signed rank test, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Also, binary logistic regression was performed to determine the independent predictors, and p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated for potential predictors of CBD stones. Results: One hundred forty-two patients were included in the study, 76 patients (53.5%) had choledocholithiasis [64.4% males, 45.8% females (p=0.028)] and 66 patients (46.5%) had normal CBD on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. In the choledocholithiasis group, the proportion of jaundice was significantly higher 61% (p=0.037), abdominal pain was reported in 54.7% of the patients (p=0.126), itching in 75% (p=0.119), change in the color of stool and urine was reported in 57.1% (p=0.718), 61.4% (p=0.209) of the patients, respectively. Positive Murphy's sign was seen in 37.4% of the patients who had CBDS (p=0.234). Visualization of CBD stones on trans-abdominal ultrasonography was the best predictor for the presence of CBDS (adjusted OR: 4.744, sensitivity: 34%, specificity: 92%, p<0.0001), followed by CBD diameter (adjusted OR: 1.350, sensitivity: 82%, specificity: 49%, p=0.000). Among Liver function tests (LFTs), total bilirubin >1.8 mg/dl, direct bilirubin >2 mg/dl, GGTP >281 U/L, and ALP >149 U/L are considered reliable predictors for choledocholithiasis. Conclusion: Visualization of CBD stones on trans-abdominal ultrasonography was the best predictor for the presence of CBDS followed by CBD diameter. CBD diameter ≥7 mm on ultrasonography in cases that the patient did not undergo cholecystectomy and more than 1 cm in cases that the patient underwent cholecystectomy are suggestive of CBDS. In presence of either conditions, we suggest proceeding to more invasive and therapeutic procedures such as ERCP.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Effect of an Educational Leaflet on Parents' Knowledge, Performance, and Self-Assessment Scores Regarding Oral Health Elements, with a Special Focus on Fluoride A Case of Posterior Scleritis with Negative Rheumatoid Factor and Positive Anti-Cyclic Citrullinated Peptide Antibody Status: Case Report Health risks from desalinated seawater used for human consumption: The case of Honaine Plant (Northwest Algeria) Analyzing the Concepts of “Good Death” from the Perspective of Nursing: A systematic review and concept analysis E-Health Literacy and Factors Affecting it in Patients Admitted to a University Hospital in Iran
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1