中国人为什么要申请破产:经验证据与政策分析

IF 1.2 4区 社会学 Q1 LAW Journal of Corporate Law Studies Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/14735970.2022.2093889
X. Zhang
{"title":"中国人为什么要申请破产:经验证据与政策分析","authors":"X. Zhang","doi":"10.1080/14735970.2022.2093889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article provides empirical evidence and policy analysis to investigate the rising caseloads of bankruptcy insolvency in China in recent years and the law's efficacy. It shows that creditors have more significant incentives to file for insolvency to invalidate possible fraudulent transactions, overcome limitations of judicial execution and hold relevant insiders accountable for the failure of liquidation. In addition, the state promoted bankruptcy to serve the Supply-Side Structural Reform and Cases about Transformation from Execution to Bankruptcy after 2015. Nonetheless, China's bankruptcy system failed the functions of eliminating inefficient firms and preserving insolvent assets. That people viewed bankruptcy as a last resort meant the lack of remaining distributable assets in bankruptcy enterprises, which might disenchant the perceived efficacy of bankruptcy in the long run. The effect of the liquidation duty was also limited because of legal ambiguities and the inability to prevent debtors from making unreasonable decisions.","PeriodicalId":44517,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Corporate Law Studies","volume":"22 1","pages":"431 - 467"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why do people apply for bankruptcy insolvency in China: empirical evidence and policy analysis\",\"authors\":\"X. Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14735970.2022.2093889\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article provides empirical evidence and policy analysis to investigate the rising caseloads of bankruptcy insolvency in China in recent years and the law's efficacy. It shows that creditors have more significant incentives to file for insolvency to invalidate possible fraudulent transactions, overcome limitations of judicial execution and hold relevant insiders accountable for the failure of liquidation. In addition, the state promoted bankruptcy to serve the Supply-Side Structural Reform and Cases about Transformation from Execution to Bankruptcy after 2015. Nonetheless, China's bankruptcy system failed the functions of eliminating inefficient firms and preserving insolvent assets. That people viewed bankruptcy as a last resort meant the lack of remaining distributable assets in bankruptcy enterprises, which might disenchant the perceived efficacy of bankruptcy in the long run. The effect of the liquidation duty was also limited because of legal ambiguities and the inability to prevent debtors from making unreasonable decisions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Corporate Law Studies\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"431 - 467\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Corporate Law Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14735970.2022.2093889\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Corporate Law Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14735970.2022.2093889","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文通过实证和政策分析,探讨了近年来中国破产案件数量的上升及其法律效力。这表明,债权人有更大的动机申请破产,以使可能存在的欺诈交易无效,克服司法执行的限制,并对清算失败追究相关内部人员的责任。此外,国家推动破产服务于供给侧结构性改革和2015年后执行向破产转型案例。尽管如此,中国的破产制度未能起到淘汰低效企业和保护资不抵债资产的作用。人们认为破产是最后的手段,这意味着破产企业缺乏剩余的可分配资产,从长远来看,这可能会使人们对破产的有效性感到失望。由于法律含糊不清和无法防止债务人作出不合理的决定,清算义务的效力也受到限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Why do people apply for bankruptcy insolvency in China: empirical evidence and policy analysis
ABSTRACT This article provides empirical evidence and policy analysis to investigate the rising caseloads of bankruptcy insolvency in China in recent years and the law's efficacy. It shows that creditors have more significant incentives to file for insolvency to invalidate possible fraudulent transactions, overcome limitations of judicial execution and hold relevant insiders accountable for the failure of liquidation. In addition, the state promoted bankruptcy to serve the Supply-Side Structural Reform and Cases about Transformation from Execution to Bankruptcy after 2015. Nonetheless, China's bankruptcy system failed the functions of eliminating inefficient firms and preserving insolvent assets. That people viewed bankruptcy as a last resort meant the lack of remaining distributable assets in bankruptcy enterprises, which might disenchant the perceived efficacy of bankruptcy in the long run. The effect of the liquidation duty was also limited because of legal ambiguities and the inability to prevent debtors from making unreasonable decisions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
The extension of vicarious liability in corporate groups Investor personhood: the case against paternalism and welfarism in corporate law Separate legal personality – an explanation and a defence Directors’ positive duty to act in the interests of the entity: shareholders’ interests bounded by corporate purpose Private credit: a renaissance in corporate finance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1