无人机-激光雷达在植被地形中的精度

IF 1.3 Q3 REMOTE SENSING Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems Pub Date : 2018-08-03 DOI:10.1139/JUVS-2017-0030
Maja Kucharczyk, C. Hugenholtz, Xueyang Zou
{"title":"无人机-激光雷达在植被地形中的精度","authors":"Maja Kucharczyk, C. Hugenholtz, Xueyang Zou","doi":"10.1139/JUVS-2017-0030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examined the horizontal and vertical accuracy of LiDAR data acquired from an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) at a field site with six vegetation types: coniferous trees, deciduous trees, short grass (0–0.3 m height), tall grass (>0.3 m height), short shrubs (0–1 m height), and tall shrubs (>1 m height). The objective was to assess positional accuracy of the ground surface in the context of digital mapping standards, and to determine how different vegetation types affect vertical accuracy. The data were acquired from a single-rotor vertical takeoff and landing UAV equipped with a Riegl VUX-1UAV laser scanner, KVH Industries 1750 IMU, and dual NovAtel GNSS receivers. Reference measurements of ground surface elevation were acquired with conventional field surveying techniques. Accuracy was evaluated using methods in the 2015 American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ASPRS) Positional Accuracy Standards for Digital Geospatial Data. Results show that horizontal accuracy and vegetated vertical accuracy at the 95% confidence level were 0.05 and 0.24 m, respectively. Median vertical errors significantly differed among 10 of 15 vegetation type pairs, highlighting the need to account for variations of vegetation structure. According to the 2015 ASPRS standards, the reported errors fulfill the requirements for mapping at the 2 and 8 cm horizontal and vertical class levels, respectively.","PeriodicalId":45619,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1139/JUVS-2017-0030","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"UAV–LiDAR accuracy in vegetated terrain\",\"authors\":\"Maja Kucharczyk, C. Hugenholtz, Xueyang Zou\",\"doi\":\"10.1139/JUVS-2017-0030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We examined the horizontal and vertical accuracy of LiDAR data acquired from an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) at a field site with six vegetation types: coniferous trees, deciduous trees, short grass (0–0.3 m height), tall grass (>0.3 m height), short shrubs (0–1 m height), and tall shrubs (>1 m height). The objective was to assess positional accuracy of the ground surface in the context of digital mapping standards, and to determine how different vegetation types affect vertical accuracy. The data were acquired from a single-rotor vertical takeoff and landing UAV equipped with a Riegl VUX-1UAV laser scanner, KVH Industries 1750 IMU, and dual NovAtel GNSS receivers. Reference measurements of ground surface elevation were acquired with conventional field surveying techniques. Accuracy was evaluated using methods in the 2015 American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ASPRS) Positional Accuracy Standards for Digital Geospatial Data. Results show that horizontal accuracy and vegetated vertical accuracy at the 95% confidence level were 0.05 and 0.24 m, respectively. Median vertical errors significantly differed among 10 of 15 vegetation type pairs, highlighting the need to account for variations of vegetation structure. According to the 2015 ASPRS standards, the reported errors fulfill the requirements for mapping at the 2 and 8 cm horizontal and vertical class levels, respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45619,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1139/JUVS-2017-0030\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1139/JUVS-2017-0030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REMOTE SENSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/JUVS-2017-0030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REMOTE SENSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

利用无人机对6种植被类型(针叶树、落叶树、矮草(0 ~ 0.3 m高度)、高草(> ~ 0.3 m高度)、矮灌木(0 ~ 1 m高度)和高灌木(> ~ 1 m高度)的LiDAR数据进行水平和垂直精度分析。目的是在数字制图标准的背景下评估地面的定位精度,并确定不同植被类型如何影响垂直精度。数据是从配备Riegl vux -1无人机激光扫描仪、KVH Industries 1750 IMU和双NovAtel GNSS接收器的单旋翼垂直起降无人机获得的。地面高程参考测量采用常规野外测量技术。使用2015年美国摄影测量与遥感学会(ASPRS)数字地理空间数据定位精度标准中的方法对精度进行了评估。结果表明,在95%置信水平下,水平精度为0.05 m,垂直精度为0.24 m。在15个植被类型对中,有10个的垂直误差中位数存在显著差异,这凸显了考虑植被结构变化的必要性。根据2015年ASPRS标准,报告的误差分别满足2 cm和8 cm水平和垂直类水平的制图要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
UAV–LiDAR accuracy in vegetated terrain
We examined the horizontal and vertical accuracy of LiDAR data acquired from an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) at a field site with six vegetation types: coniferous trees, deciduous trees, short grass (0–0.3 m height), tall grass (>0.3 m height), short shrubs (0–1 m height), and tall shrubs (>1 m height). The objective was to assess positional accuracy of the ground surface in the context of digital mapping standards, and to determine how different vegetation types affect vertical accuracy. The data were acquired from a single-rotor vertical takeoff and landing UAV equipped with a Riegl VUX-1UAV laser scanner, KVH Industries 1750 IMU, and dual NovAtel GNSS receivers. Reference measurements of ground surface elevation were acquired with conventional field surveying techniques. Accuracy was evaluated using methods in the 2015 American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ASPRS) Positional Accuracy Standards for Digital Geospatial Data. Results show that horizontal accuracy and vegetated vertical accuracy at the 95% confidence level were 0.05 and 0.24 m, respectively. Median vertical errors significantly differed among 10 of 15 vegetation type pairs, highlighting the need to account for variations of vegetation structure. According to the 2015 ASPRS standards, the reported errors fulfill the requirements for mapping at the 2 and 8 cm horizontal and vertical class levels, respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊最新文献
An examination of trends in the growing scientific literature on approaching wildlife with drones The utility of drones for studying polar bear behaviour in the Canadian Arctic: opportunities and recommendations Detection and tracking of belugas, kayaks and motorized boats in drone video using deep learning Potential Cyber Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Protections of Unmanned Vehicles Pilots’ Willingness to Operate in Urban Air Mobility Integrated Airspace: A Moderated Mediation Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1