黑暗在回响:探索爱尔兰的饥荒、死亡和叛乱之地。作者:Gillian O'Brien。第373页。都柏林:爱尔兰双日。2020.平装本21欧元。

IF 0.3 1区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY IRISH HISTORICAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2021-11-01 DOI:10.1017/ihs.2021.49
Sinéad McCoole
{"title":"黑暗在回响:探索爱尔兰的饥荒、死亡和叛乱之地。作者:Gillian O'Brien。第373页。都柏林:爱尔兰双日。2020.平装本21欧元。","authors":"Sinéad McCoole","doi":"10.1017/ihs.2021.49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"action on health reform could be viewed as radical, progressive and independent. Ireland in consequence was ahead of Britain and much of Europe in the enactment of childhood immunisation schemes. Despite this stance, it took years for a successful immunisation scheme in Ireland to be implemented. Dwyer chronicles the initiatives undertaken and reveals the many factors which helped or held back the development of immunisation in Ireland. These included obstruction by some from the wider medical community. He explores the different experiences of the major cities of Cork and Dublin and the different levels of success in implementing an immunisation programme. Explaining howmuch relied on the actions and motivation of the supervising medical officer as to whether there was successful uptake of the programme. Other problems had significant impacts such as the ill-fated Ring College incident, during which twenty-four children reportedly contracted tuberculosis and one twelve-year-old girl died following routine anti-diphtheria immunisation. Dwyer provides new evidencewhich suggests that liability lay with the local attending doctor and his advisors rather than with BurroughsWellcomewhere previous historiography has assigned the blame. Dwyer spends some time discussing the Burroughs Wellcome vaccine trials in Ireland held during the mid twentieth century. He reveals the more problematic aspects of the push to find and introduce an effective anti-diphtheria immunisation. He discloses how the rights of vulnerable children in institutional care were clearly side-lined. The scandal first came to light during the 1990s, but this study by Dwyer reveals the much wider prevalence of the practice by the company than previously thought. Furthermore, the available evidence suggests parents and guardians of children involved in trials were kept in the dark about the potentially lethal nature of the vaccines administered to the children. Dwyer points out that while the religious congregations behind these institutions have received considerable attention much less has been focused on the scientific andmedical communities behind the trials. In his opinion further investigation should focus on these communities and their actions. Dwyer also raises important questions around the ethical practices of those involved, who chose to carry out the trials on Irish children as British legislation prevented them from doing so on children in Britain. He queries why those involved deemed the children in Irish institutions as lesser beings and not offered the same protections as their British counterparts. His work fits more widely into the growing interest in recent years in uncovering institutional abuse of children in Ireland. Various reports have been published in recent years ― such as Ryan (2009), Ferns (2005) and Murphy (2009) ― which have revealed the wide extent of child abuse historically within Irish institutions. Dwyer’s book provides a well-written, thorough and thoughtful history of diphtheria immunisation in Ireland. His workmakes a significant contribution to the history of medicine in Ireland and more generally. Furthermore, the difficulties around the roll-out of immunisation schemes mirrors many difficulties experienced today, where a significant anti-vaccine movement exists. In consequence, this book provides useful and thought-provoking context to the current debate around vaccination and to the investigations into historic institutional abuse in Ireland.","PeriodicalId":44187,"journal":{"name":"IRISH HISTORICAL STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The darkness echoing: exploring Ireland's places of famine, death and rebellion. By Gillian O'Brien. Pp 373. Dublin: Doubleday Ireland. 2020. €21 paperback.\",\"authors\":\"Sinéad McCoole\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/ihs.2021.49\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"action on health reform could be viewed as radical, progressive and independent. Ireland in consequence was ahead of Britain and much of Europe in the enactment of childhood immunisation schemes. Despite this stance, it took years for a successful immunisation scheme in Ireland to be implemented. Dwyer chronicles the initiatives undertaken and reveals the many factors which helped or held back the development of immunisation in Ireland. These included obstruction by some from the wider medical community. He explores the different experiences of the major cities of Cork and Dublin and the different levels of success in implementing an immunisation programme. Explaining howmuch relied on the actions and motivation of the supervising medical officer as to whether there was successful uptake of the programme. Other problems had significant impacts such as the ill-fated Ring College incident, during which twenty-four children reportedly contracted tuberculosis and one twelve-year-old girl died following routine anti-diphtheria immunisation. Dwyer provides new evidencewhich suggests that liability lay with the local attending doctor and his advisors rather than with BurroughsWellcomewhere previous historiography has assigned the blame. Dwyer spends some time discussing the Burroughs Wellcome vaccine trials in Ireland held during the mid twentieth century. He reveals the more problematic aspects of the push to find and introduce an effective anti-diphtheria immunisation. He discloses how the rights of vulnerable children in institutional care were clearly side-lined. The scandal first came to light during the 1990s, but this study by Dwyer reveals the much wider prevalence of the practice by the company than previously thought. Furthermore, the available evidence suggests parents and guardians of children involved in trials were kept in the dark about the potentially lethal nature of the vaccines administered to the children. Dwyer points out that while the religious congregations behind these institutions have received considerable attention much less has been focused on the scientific andmedical communities behind the trials. In his opinion further investigation should focus on these communities and their actions. Dwyer also raises important questions around the ethical practices of those involved, who chose to carry out the trials on Irish children as British legislation prevented them from doing so on children in Britain. He queries why those involved deemed the children in Irish institutions as lesser beings and not offered the same protections as their British counterparts. His work fits more widely into the growing interest in recent years in uncovering institutional abuse of children in Ireland. Various reports have been published in recent years ― such as Ryan (2009), Ferns (2005) and Murphy (2009) ― which have revealed the wide extent of child abuse historically within Irish institutions. Dwyer’s book provides a well-written, thorough and thoughtful history of diphtheria immunisation in Ireland. His workmakes a significant contribution to the history of medicine in Ireland and more generally. Furthermore, the difficulties around the roll-out of immunisation schemes mirrors many difficulties experienced today, where a significant anti-vaccine movement exists. In consequence, this book provides useful and thought-provoking context to the current debate around vaccination and to the investigations into historic institutional abuse in Ireland.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IRISH HISTORICAL STUDIES\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IRISH HISTORICAL STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/ihs.2021.49\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRISH HISTORICAL STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ihs.2021.49","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

医疗改革的行动可以被视为激进的、进步的和独立的。因此,爱尔兰在制定儿童免疫计划方面走在了英国和欧洲大部分国家的前面。尽管持这种立场,但爱尔兰花了数年时间才成功实施了免疫计划。德怀尔记录了所采取的举措,并揭示了帮助或阻碍爱尔兰免疫发展的许多因素。其中包括来自更广泛的医学界的一些人的阻挠。他探讨了主要城市科克和都柏林的不同经历,以及实施免疫计划的不同成功程度。解释方案能否成功实施,在多大程度上取决于医务督导官的行动和动机。其他问题产生了重大影响,例如不幸的Ring学院事件,据报道,24名儿童感染了结核病,一名12岁的女孩在常规的抗白喉免疫接种后死亡。德怀尔提供了新的证据,表明责任在于当地的主治医生和他的顾问,而不是以前的史学所认定的责任在于burroughswellcome.com。Dwyer花了一些时间讨论20世纪中期在爱尔兰进行的Burroughs Wellcome疫苗试验。他揭示了寻找和引入有效的抗白喉免疫接种的努力中更有问题的方面。他披露了机构照料中弱势儿童的权利是如何被明显边缘化的。这一丑闻首次曝光是在上世纪90年代,但德怀尔的这项研究显示,该公司这种做法的普遍程度远比之前想象的要高。此外,现有证据表明,参与试验的儿童的父母和监护人被蒙在鼓里,不知道给儿童接种的疫苗可能具有致命性。德怀尔指出,虽然这些机构背后的宗教团体受到了相当多的关注,但对这些试验背后的科学和医学界的关注却很少。他认为,进一步的调查应集中在这些社区及其行动上。德怀尔还对相关人员的道德行为提出了重要质疑,他们选择在爱尔兰儿童身上进行试验,因为英国的法律禁止他们在英国的儿童身上进行试验。他质疑为什么这些人认为爱尔兰机构里的孩子是低人一等的人,而不像英国机构里的孩子那样提供同样的保护。近年来,人们对揭露爱尔兰机构虐待儿童的行为越来越感兴趣,而他的工作更符合这一趋势。近年来发表了各种各样的报告,如Ryan (2009), Ferns(2005)和Murphy(2009),这些报告揭示了爱尔兰机构历史上虐待儿童的广泛程度。德怀尔的书提供了一个写得很好,彻底和深思熟虑的历史白喉免疫在爱尔兰。他的作品对爱尔兰乃至更广泛的医学史做出了重大贡献。此外,围绕推出免疫计划的困难反映了今天经历的许多困难,在那里存在着重大的反疫苗运动。因此,这本书提供了有用的和发人深省的背景,目前围绕疫苗接种的辩论和调查历史机构滥用在爱尔兰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The darkness echoing: exploring Ireland's places of famine, death and rebellion. By Gillian O'Brien. Pp 373. Dublin: Doubleday Ireland. 2020. €21 paperback.
action on health reform could be viewed as radical, progressive and independent. Ireland in consequence was ahead of Britain and much of Europe in the enactment of childhood immunisation schemes. Despite this stance, it took years for a successful immunisation scheme in Ireland to be implemented. Dwyer chronicles the initiatives undertaken and reveals the many factors which helped or held back the development of immunisation in Ireland. These included obstruction by some from the wider medical community. He explores the different experiences of the major cities of Cork and Dublin and the different levels of success in implementing an immunisation programme. Explaining howmuch relied on the actions and motivation of the supervising medical officer as to whether there was successful uptake of the programme. Other problems had significant impacts such as the ill-fated Ring College incident, during which twenty-four children reportedly contracted tuberculosis and one twelve-year-old girl died following routine anti-diphtheria immunisation. Dwyer provides new evidencewhich suggests that liability lay with the local attending doctor and his advisors rather than with BurroughsWellcomewhere previous historiography has assigned the blame. Dwyer spends some time discussing the Burroughs Wellcome vaccine trials in Ireland held during the mid twentieth century. He reveals the more problematic aspects of the push to find and introduce an effective anti-diphtheria immunisation. He discloses how the rights of vulnerable children in institutional care were clearly side-lined. The scandal first came to light during the 1990s, but this study by Dwyer reveals the much wider prevalence of the practice by the company than previously thought. Furthermore, the available evidence suggests parents and guardians of children involved in trials were kept in the dark about the potentially lethal nature of the vaccines administered to the children. Dwyer points out that while the religious congregations behind these institutions have received considerable attention much less has been focused on the scientific andmedical communities behind the trials. In his opinion further investigation should focus on these communities and their actions. Dwyer also raises important questions around the ethical practices of those involved, who chose to carry out the trials on Irish children as British legislation prevented them from doing so on children in Britain. He queries why those involved deemed the children in Irish institutions as lesser beings and not offered the same protections as their British counterparts. His work fits more widely into the growing interest in recent years in uncovering institutional abuse of children in Ireland. Various reports have been published in recent years ― such as Ryan (2009), Ferns (2005) and Murphy (2009) ― which have revealed the wide extent of child abuse historically within Irish institutions. Dwyer’s book provides a well-written, thorough and thoughtful history of diphtheria immunisation in Ireland. His workmakes a significant contribution to the history of medicine in Ireland and more generally. Furthermore, the difficulties around the roll-out of immunisation schemes mirrors many difficulties experienced today, where a significant anti-vaccine movement exists. In consequence, this book provides useful and thought-provoking context to the current debate around vaccination and to the investigations into historic institutional abuse in Ireland.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: This journal is published jointly by the Irish Historical Society and the Ulster Society for Irish Historical Studies. Published twice a year, Irish Historical Studies covers all areas of Irish history, including the medieval period. We thank William E. Vaughn of the management committee of Irish Historical Studies for his permission to republish the following two articles.
期刊最新文献
The impact of military demobilisation on rising Irish migration to London, c.1750–1850 The pope, a knight and a bishop on the edge of Christendom: the politics of exclusion in thirteenth-century Ireland Colonialist intervention in a metropolitan revolution: reconsidering A remonstrance of divers remarkeable passages Ethnographic collections in Northern Ireland and the Solomon Islands tomako (canoe) at the Ulster Museum, 1898–2023 The Weaver Street bombing in Belfast 1922: violence, politics and memory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1