Yan Liu, Chanmin Kim, Amery Wu, P. Gustafson, Edward Kroc, B. Zumbo
{"title":"差异项目功能分析中倾向得分方法的性能研究","authors":"Yan Liu, Chanmin Kim, Amery Wu, P. Gustafson, Edward Kroc, B. Zumbo","doi":"10.22237/jmasm/1556669280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To evaluate the performance of propensity score approaches for differential item functioning analysis, this simulation study was conducted to assess bias, mean square error, Type I error, and power under different levels of effect size and a variety of model misspecification conditions, including different types and missing patterns of covariates.","PeriodicalId":47201,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods","volume":"18 1","pages":"18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the Performance of Propensity Score Approaches for Differential Item Functioning Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Yan Liu, Chanmin Kim, Amery Wu, P. Gustafson, Edward Kroc, B. Zumbo\",\"doi\":\"10.22237/jmasm/1556669280\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To evaluate the performance of propensity score approaches for differential item functioning analysis, this simulation study was conducted to assess bias, mean square error, Type I error, and power under different levels of effect size and a variety of model misspecification conditions, including different types and missing patterns of covariates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1556669280\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1556669280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
Investigating the Performance of Propensity Score Approaches for Differential Item Functioning Analysis
To evaluate the performance of propensity score approaches for differential item functioning analysis, this simulation study was conducted to assess bias, mean square error, Type I error, and power under different levels of effect size and a variety of model misspecification conditions, including different types and missing patterns of covariates.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods is an independent, peer-reviewed, open access journal designed to provide an outlet for the scholarly works of applied nonparametric or parametric statisticians, data analysts, researchers, classical or modern psychometricians, and quantitative or qualitative methodologists/evaluators.