{"title":"评价美国法规——评夏皮罗的《污染趋势与美国环境政策:半个世纪以来的教训》","authors":"K. Segerson","doi":"10.1086/721099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is a comment on Shapiro’s “Pollution Trends and US Environmental Policy: Lessons from the Past Half Century.” It first provides some historical perspective by comparing Shapiro’s analysis and conclusions to an article published 20 years ago by A. Myrick Freeman III. It then discusses (and slightly reframes) Shapiro’s four hypotheses and highlights the importance of understanding the counterfactuals implied by each hypothesis. Finally, it suggests at least one key lesson that emerges from Shapiro’s analysis and its implications for future work—namely, the need not only to improve methods and data for analyzing existing regulations but also to increase efforts to reduce currently unregulated sources of pollution, such as agricultural pollution and greenhouse gas emissions.","PeriodicalId":47676,"journal":{"name":"Review of Environmental Economics and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating US Regulations: A Comment on Joseph S. Shapiro’s “Pollution Trends and US Environmental Policy: Lessons from the Past Half Century”\",\"authors\":\"K. Segerson\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/721099\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article is a comment on Shapiro’s “Pollution Trends and US Environmental Policy: Lessons from the Past Half Century.” It first provides some historical perspective by comparing Shapiro’s analysis and conclusions to an article published 20 years ago by A. Myrick Freeman III. It then discusses (and slightly reframes) Shapiro’s four hypotheses and highlights the importance of understanding the counterfactuals implied by each hypothesis. Finally, it suggests at least one key lesson that emerges from Shapiro’s analysis and its implications for future work—namely, the need not only to improve methods and data for analyzing existing regulations but also to increase efforts to reduce currently unregulated sources of pollution, such as agricultural pollution and greenhouse gas emissions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Environmental Economics and Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Environmental Economics and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/721099\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Environmental Economics and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/721099","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating US Regulations: A Comment on Joseph S. Shapiro’s “Pollution Trends and US Environmental Policy: Lessons from the Past Half Century”
This article is a comment on Shapiro’s “Pollution Trends and US Environmental Policy: Lessons from the Past Half Century.” It first provides some historical perspective by comparing Shapiro’s analysis and conclusions to an article published 20 years ago by A. Myrick Freeman III. It then discusses (and slightly reframes) Shapiro’s four hypotheses and highlights the importance of understanding the counterfactuals implied by each hypothesis. Finally, it suggests at least one key lesson that emerges from Shapiro’s analysis and its implications for future work—namely, the need not only to improve methods and data for analyzing existing regulations but also to increase efforts to reduce currently unregulated sources of pollution, such as agricultural pollution and greenhouse gas emissions.
期刊介绍:
The Review of Environmental Economics and Policy fills the gap between traditional academic journals and the general interest press by providing a widely accessible yet scholarly source for the latest thinking on environmental economics and related policy. The Review publishes symposia, articles, and regular features that contribute to one or more of the following goals: •to identify and synthesize lessons learned from recent and ongoing environmental economics research; •to provide economic analysis of environmental policy issues; •to promote the sharing of ideas and perspectives among the various sub-fields of environmental economics;