Karen Wong , Stephanie Gill , Phil Murphy , Joan Crane
{"title":"妊娠期体重增加和妊娠前糖尿病对围产期结局的相对重要性:一项回顾性队列研究","authors":"Karen Wong , Stephanie Gill , Phil Murphy , Joan Crane","doi":"10.1016/j.deman.2022.100095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>The objective of this study is to determine the risks of macrosomia, LGA, and Caesarean section associated with a diagnosis of pre-gestational diabetes or gestational weight gain.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This is a retrospective cohort study utilizing data from the Perinatal Surveillance Database of Newfoundland & Labrador from 2001 – 2020. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine odds ratios (OR) associated with GWG and pre-gestational diabetes for the outcomes macrosomia, LGA, and CS, while controlling for other known risk factors.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were 234 pregnancies complicated by pre-gestational diabetes and 22,048 without diabetes included. There was no significant difference in absolute GWG between groups (15.2 kg vs. 15.5 kg, <em>p</em> = 0.12), however more women with pre-gestational diabetes had excessive GWG (85.1% vs. 78.5%, <em>p</em> = 0.04). Pre-gestational diabetes was a significant predictor of LGA (OR 5.21, 95% CI 3.96 – 6.87), macrosomia (OR 2.63 95% CI 1.98 – 3.48), and Caesarean section (OR 3.44, 95% CI 2.60 – 4.56). The OR associated with excessive GWG were lower for these same outcomes (LGA OR 2.73, 95% CI 2.40 – 3.11; macrosomia 2.38, 95% CI 2.12 – 2.69; Caesarean section OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.19 – 1.39).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We have identified that pre-gestational diabetes is the most significant risk factor for poor outcomes such as LGA, macrosomia, and Caesarean section, although excessive GWG also plays a role.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72796,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes epidemiology and management","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100095"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666970622000452/pdfft?md5=7dec95b2b88ab6c4751a552549a55b97&pid=1-s2.0-S2666970622000452-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The relative importance of gestational weight gain and pre-gestational diabetes on perinatal outcomes: A retrospective cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Karen Wong , Stephanie Gill , Phil Murphy , Joan Crane\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.deman.2022.100095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>The objective of this study is to determine the risks of macrosomia, LGA, and Caesarean section associated with a diagnosis of pre-gestational diabetes or gestational weight gain.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This is a retrospective cohort study utilizing data from the Perinatal Surveillance Database of Newfoundland & Labrador from 2001 – 2020. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine odds ratios (OR) associated with GWG and pre-gestational diabetes for the outcomes macrosomia, LGA, and CS, while controlling for other known risk factors.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were 234 pregnancies complicated by pre-gestational diabetes and 22,048 without diabetes included. There was no significant difference in absolute GWG between groups (15.2 kg vs. 15.5 kg, <em>p</em> = 0.12), however more women with pre-gestational diabetes had excessive GWG (85.1% vs. 78.5%, <em>p</em> = 0.04). Pre-gestational diabetes was a significant predictor of LGA (OR 5.21, 95% CI 3.96 – 6.87), macrosomia (OR 2.63 95% CI 1.98 – 3.48), and Caesarean section (OR 3.44, 95% CI 2.60 – 4.56). The OR associated with excessive GWG were lower for these same outcomes (LGA OR 2.73, 95% CI 2.40 – 3.11; macrosomia 2.38, 95% CI 2.12 – 2.69; Caesarean section OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.19 – 1.39).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We have identified that pre-gestational diabetes is the most significant risk factor for poor outcomes such as LGA, macrosomia, and Caesarean section, although excessive GWG also plays a role.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes epidemiology and management\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100095\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666970622000452/pdfft?md5=7dec95b2b88ab6c4751a552549a55b97&pid=1-s2.0-S2666970622000452-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes epidemiology and management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666970622000452\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes epidemiology and management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666970622000452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的本研究的目的是确定巨大儿、LGA和剖腹产的风险与孕前糖尿病或妊娠期体重增加的诊断相关。方法回顾性队列研究利用纽芬兰围产期监测数据库的数据;2001 - 2020年的拉布拉多。在控制其他已知危险因素的同时,采用多因素logistic回归分析确定与GWG和孕前糖尿病相关的巨大儿、LGA和CS的比值比(OR)。结果234例妊娠合并妊娠前糖尿病,22048例未合并妊娠糖尿病。绝对GWG在两组间无显著差异(15.2 kg对15.5 kg, p = 0.12),但更多的妊娠前糖尿病妇女GWG过高(85.1%对78.5%,p = 0.04)。妊娠前糖尿病是LGA (OR 5.21, 95% CI 3.96 - 6.87)、巨大儿(OR 2.63, 95% CI 1.98 - 3.48)和剖宫产(OR 3.44, 95% CI 2.60 - 4.56)的重要预测因子。在这些相同的结果中,与过量GWG相关的OR较低(LGA OR 2.73, 95% CI 2.40 - 3.11;巨大儿2.38,95% CI 2.12 - 2.69;剖宫产(OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.19 - 1.39)。结论妊娠前期糖尿病是LGA、巨大儿和剖宫产等不良结局的最重要危险因素,尽管GWG过高也起一定作用。
The relative importance of gestational weight gain and pre-gestational diabetes on perinatal outcomes: A retrospective cohort study
Aims
The objective of this study is to determine the risks of macrosomia, LGA, and Caesarean section associated with a diagnosis of pre-gestational diabetes or gestational weight gain.
Methods
This is a retrospective cohort study utilizing data from the Perinatal Surveillance Database of Newfoundland & Labrador from 2001 – 2020. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine odds ratios (OR) associated with GWG and pre-gestational diabetes for the outcomes macrosomia, LGA, and CS, while controlling for other known risk factors.
Results
There were 234 pregnancies complicated by pre-gestational diabetes and 22,048 without diabetes included. There was no significant difference in absolute GWG between groups (15.2 kg vs. 15.5 kg, p = 0.12), however more women with pre-gestational diabetes had excessive GWG (85.1% vs. 78.5%, p = 0.04). Pre-gestational diabetes was a significant predictor of LGA (OR 5.21, 95% CI 3.96 – 6.87), macrosomia (OR 2.63 95% CI 1.98 – 3.48), and Caesarean section (OR 3.44, 95% CI 2.60 – 4.56). The OR associated with excessive GWG were lower for these same outcomes (LGA OR 2.73, 95% CI 2.40 – 3.11; macrosomia 2.38, 95% CI 2.12 – 2.69; Caesarean section OR 1.29, 95% CI 1.19 – 1.39).
Conclusions
We have identified that pre-gestational diabetes is the most significant risk factor for poor outcomes such as LGA, macrosomia, and Caesarean section, although excessive GWG also plays a role.