跆拳道训练动作中运动强度的对比分析

Pub Date : 2022-10-26 DOI:10.31083/j.jomh1810209
Suzuki Jin, Wilson. So, Dong‐il Seo
{"title":"跆拳道训练动作中运动强度的对比分析","authors":"Suzuki Jin, Wilson. So, Dong‐il Seo","doi":"10.31083/j.jomh1810209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : Taekkyeon is designated as Korea’s Important Intangible Cultural Property No. 76 and listed as a UNESCO intangible cultural heritage. This study aimed to analyze the exercise intensity of Taekkyeon, with a focus on Honjayikhigi (“the movements for practice on their own while moving or in place; the basic movements of Taekkyeon”), Bondaeboegi (“the method of practicing movements that harmoniously connect Taekkyeon’s offense and defense movements”), and Majumegigi (“the method of practicing hand and kick movements for offense”) training movements, which are components of Taekkyeon. Methods : Eleven Taekkyeon instructors were included in this study. The performance of Taekkyeon movements was assessed at Dongguk University in March 2022. During Honjayikhigi, Bondaeboegi, and Majumegigi training movements, heart rates were measured using a polar monitor. For all variables, the means and standard deviations were calculated using descriptive statistics, and a paired sample t -test was used to compare the heart rates among Honjayikhigi, Bondaeboegi, and Majumegigi training movements. Statistical significance was set at α = 0.05. Results : The average heart rates during Honjayikhigi, Bondaeboegi, and Majumegigi training movements were 131.42 ± 8.85, 128.53 ± 8.43, and 126.34 ± 9.26 beats/min, respectively. The exercise intensity of Honjayikhigi was significantly higher than that of Majumegigi ( p = 0.200). In Honjayikhigi, the exercise intensities of Naagamyoegigi ( p = 0.007) and Mannajungikhigi ( p = 0.017) were significantly higher than that of Seoseoikhigi. In Bondaeboegi, the exercise intensities of Apaugery Yeodulmadang and Diaugery Nemadang were not significantly different. In Majumegigi, the exercise intensities of Ikhimsu ( p < 0.001) and Majuchagi ( p < 0.001) were higher than that of Majugeori, whereas those of Ikhimsu ( p = 0.003) and Majuchagi ( p < 0.001) were higher than that of Maguemgil. The exercise intensities of Ikhimsu ( p = 0.001) and Majuchagi ( p < 0.001) were higher than that of Allermegigi. Conclusions : Adjusting the training sequence and duration according to Taekkyeon level must be considered when establishing a training program because of the apparent differences in exercise intensity among the training movements. Our findings suggest that a greater training efficacy can be achieved if training levels in each Taekkyeon movement are properly classified and customized for beginners.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Exercise Intensity in Taekkyeon Training Movements\",\"authors\":\"Suzuki Jin, Wilson. So, Dong‐il Seo\",\"doi\":\"10.31083/j.jomh1810209\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background : Taekkyeon is designated as Korea’s Important Intangible Cultural Property No. 76 and listed as a UNESCO intangible cultural heritage. This study aimed to analyze the exercise intensity of Taekkyeon, with a focus on Honjayikhigi (“the movements for practice on their own while moving or in place; the basic movements of Taekkyeon”), Bondaeboegi (“the method of practicing movements that harmoniously connect Taekkyeon’s offense and defense movements”), and Majumegigi (“the method of practicing hand and kick movements for offense”) training movements, which are components of Taekkyeon. Methods : Eleven Taekkyeon instructors were included in this study. The performance of Taekkyeon movements was assessed at Dongguk University in March 2022. During Honjayikhigi, Bondaeboegi, and Majumegigi training movements, heart rates were measured using a polar monitor. For all variables, the means and standard deviations were calculated using descriptive statistics, and a paired sample t -test was used to compare the heart rates among Honjayikhigi, Bondaeboegi, and Majumegigi training movements. Statistical significance was set at α = 0.05. Results : The average heart rates during Honjayikhigi, Bondaeboegi, and Majumegigi training movements were 131.42 ± 8.85, 128.53 ± 8.43, and 126.34 ± 9.26 beats/min, respectively. The exercise intensity of Honjayikhigi was significantly higher than that of Majumegigi ( p = 0.200). In Honjayikhigi, the exercise intensities of Naagamyoegigi ( p = 0.007) and Mannajungikhigi ( p = 0.017) were significantly higher than that of Seoseoikhigi. In Bondaeboegi, the exercise intensities of Apaugery Yeodulmadang and Diaugery Nemadang were not significantly different. In Majumegigi, the exercise intensities of Ikhimsu ( p < 0.001) and Majuchagi ( p < 0.001) were higher than that of Majugeori, whereas those of Ikhimsu ( p = 0.003) and Majuchagi ( p < 0.001) were higher than that of Maguemgil. The exercise intensities of Ikhimsu ( p = 0.001) and Majuchagi ( p < 0.001) were higher than that of Allermegigi. Conclusions : Adjusting the training sequence and duration according to Taekkyeon level must be considered when establishing a training program because of the apparent differences in exercise intensity among the training movements. Our findings suggest that a greater training efficacy can be achieved if training levels in each Taekkyeon movement are properly classified and customized for beginners.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.jomh1810209\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.jomh1810209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:跆拳道被指定为韩国重要非物质文化遗产第76号,被列入联合国教科文组织非物质文化遗产名录。本研究旨在分析跆拳道的运动强度,重点是跆拳道的组成部分“Honjayikhigi”(“在移动或原地进行自己练习的动作;跆拳道的基本动作”),“Bondaeboegi”(“将跆拳道的进攻和防守动作和谐地联系起来的练习动作的方法”)和“Majumegigi”(“练习进攻的手和脚动作的方法”)训练动作。方法:以11名跆拳道教练为研究对象。2022年3月在东国大学对跆拳道动作进行了评价。在“Honjayikhigi”、“Bondaeboegi”和“Majumegigi”训练运动中,使用极地监测器测量心率。对于所有变量,使用描述性统计计算均值和标准差,并使用配对样本t检验比较Honjayikhigi, Bondaeboegi和Majumegigi训练动作的心率。统计学意义设为α = 0.05。结果:Honjayikhigi、Bondaeboegi和Majumegigi训练动作时的平均心率分别为131.42±8.85、128.53±8.43和126.34±9.26次/分。Honjayikhigi的运动强度显著高于Majumegigi (p = 0.200)。在Honjayikhigi中,Naagamyoegigi (p = 0.007)和Mannajungikhigi (p = 0.017)的运动强度显著高于Seoseoikhigi。在Bondaeboegi, Apaugery yeduulmadang和Diaugery Nemadang的运动强度无显著差异。在Majumegigi中,Ikhimsu (p < 0.001)和Majuchagi (p < 0.001)的运动强度高于majugei,而Ikhimsu (p = 0.003)和Majuchagi (p < 0.001)的运动强度高于Maguemgil。Ikhimsu (p = 0.001)和Majuchagi (p < 0.001)的运动强度高于Allermegigi (p < 0.001)。结论:由于各训练动作的运动强度存在明显差异,在制定训练计划时应考虑根据跆拳道水平调整训练顺序和时间。我们的研究结果表明,如果对每个跆拳道动作的训练水平进行适当的分类和定制,可以达到更大的训练效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
Comparative Analysis of Exercise Intensity in Taekkyeon Training Movements
Background : Taekkyeon is designated as Korea’s Important Intangible Cultural Property No. 76 and listed as a UNESCO intangible cultural heritage. This study aimed to analyze the exercise intensity of Taekkyeon, with a focus on Honjayikhigi (“the movements for practice on their own while moving or in place; the basic movements of Taekkyeon”), Bondaeboegi (“the method of practicing movements that harmoniously connect Taekkyeon’s offense and defense movements”), and Majumegigi (“the method of practicing hand and kick movements for offense”) training movements, which are components of Taekkyeon. Methods : Eleven Taekkyeon instructors were included in this study. The performance of Taekkyeon movements was assessed at Dongguk University in March 2022. During Honjayikhigi, Bondaeboegi, and Majumegigi training movements, heart rates were measured using a polar monitor. For all variables, the means and standard deviations were calculated using descriptive statistics, and a paired sample t -test was used to compare the heart rates among Honjayikhigi, Bondaeboegi, and Majumegigi training movements. Statistical significance was set at α = 0.05. Results : The average heart rates during Honjayikhigi, Bondaeboegi, and Majumegigi training movements were 131.42 ± 8.85, 128.53 ± 8.43, and 126.34 ± 9.26 beats/min, respectively. The exercise intensity of Honjayikhigi was significantly higher than that of Majumegigi ( p = 0.200). In Honjayikhigi, the exercise intensities of Naagamyoegigi ( p = 0.007) and Mannajungikhigi ( p = 0.017) were significantly higher than that of Seoseoikhigi. In Bondaeboegi, the exercise intensities of Apaugery Yeodulmadang and Diaugery Nemadang were not significantly different. In Majumegigi, the exercise intensities of Ikhimsu ( p < 0.001) and Majuchagi ( p < 0.001) were higher than that of Majugeori, whereas those of Ikhimsu ( p = 0.003) and Majuchagi ( p < 0.001) were higher than that of Maguemgil. The exercise intensities of Ikhimsu ( p = 0.001) and Majuchagi ( p < 0.001) were higher than that of Allermegigi. Conclusions : Adjusting the training sequence and duration according to Taekkyeon level must be considered when establishing a training program because of the apparent differences in exercise intensity among the training movements. Our findings suggest that a greater training efficacy can be achieved if training levels in each Taekkyeon movement are properly classified and customized for beginners.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1