印度学术界的合作程度如何?排名前三的机构的案例研究

IF 0.4 Q4 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Annals of Library and Information Studies Pub Date : 2022-03-28 DOI:10.56042/alis.v69i1.58175
Bhaskar Mukherjee, Ankit Singh
{"title":"印度学术界的合作程度如何?排名前三的机构的案例研究","authors":"Bhaskar Mukherjee, Ankit Singh","doi":"10.56042/alis.v69i1.58175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study employs bibliometric methods to examine the pattern of existing collaboration in India’s top three ranked academic institutes using publications indexed in the Web of Science for the period 2000 to 2020. The results show although the number of collaborations and the degree of collaboration have increased over time, however, the collaboration coefficient remains almost the same in the three institutes. The lesser negative Pearson correlation between authors and articles with a higher positive Pearson correlation between articles and citations for JNU publications suggests that collaboration with a smaller group is more successful than a larger group for gaining citations. Collaborative publications of Banaras Hindu University (36%) and Indian Institute of Science (33%) are more inclined towards authors of the same department, while for Jawaharlal Nehru University, it is with other authors from different universities (41%). The foreign collaboration for all three institutes is almost the same. The network visualization of collaboration in three institutes suggests that the collaborative research in IISc is more diverse than JNU or BHU and in national collaboration, distance between two national organizations also play an important role for strong collaboration. Overall, theoretical aspects of physics lead in collaborative publications followed by chemical sciences. Agricultural biotechnology, clinical medicine, polymer sciences and nanoscience are some emerging disciplines where organizations are increasing their participation through collaborative research.","PeriodicalId":42973,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Library and Information Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How collaborative is Indian academia? A case study of top three ranked institutions\",\"authors\":\"Bhaskar Mukherjee, Ankit Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.56042/alis.v69i1.58175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present study employs bibliometric methods to examine the pattern of existing collaboration in India’s top three ranked academic institutes using publications indexed in the Web of Science for the period 2000 to 2020. The results show although the number of collaborations and the degree of collaboration have increased over time, however, the collaboration coefficient remains almost the same in the three institutes. The lesser negative Pearson correlation between authors and articles with a higher positive Pearson correlation between articles and citations for JNU publications suggests that collaboration with a smaller group is more successful than a larger group for gaining citations. Collaborative publications of Banaras Hindu University (36%) and Indian Institute of Science (33%) are more inclined towards authors of the same department, while for Jawaharlal Nehru University, it is with other authors from different universities (41%). The foreign collaboration for all three institutes is almost the same. The network visualization of collaboration in three institutes suggests that the collaborative research in IISc is more diverse than JNU or BHU and in national collaboration, distance between two national organizations also play an important role for strong collaboration. Overall, theoretical aspects of physics lead in collaborative publications followed by chemical sciences. Agricultural biotechnology, clinical medicine, polymer sciences and nanoscience are some emerging disciplines where organizations are increasing their participation through collaborative research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Library and Information Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Library and Information Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56042/alis.v69i1.58175\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Library and Information Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56042/alis.v69i1.58175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究采用文献计量学方法,利用2000年至2020年期间被Web of Science索引的出版物,检查了印度排名前三的学术机构现有的合作模式。结果表明,虽然合作次数和合作程度随着时间的推移而增加,但合作系数在三所研究所中几乎保持不变。作者和文章之间的负Pearson相关性较小,JNU出版物的文章和引用之间的正Pearson相关性较高,这表明在获得引用方面,与较小群体的合作比与较大群体的合作更成功。巴纳拉斯印度教大学(36%)和印度科学研究所(33%)的合作出版物更倾向于来自同一院系的作者,而贾瓦哈拉尔尼赫鲁大学的合作出版物更倾向于来自不同大学的其他作者(41%)。这三家研究所的对外合作几乎是一样的。三个研究所合作的网络可视化表明,IISc的合作研究比JNU或BHU更多样化,在国家合作中,两个国家组织之间的距离对强合作也起着重要作用。总的来说,物理学的理论方面在合作出版物中占主导地位,其次是化学科学。农业生物技术、临床医学、聚合物科学和纳米科学是一些新兴学科,组织正在通过合作研究增加他们的参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How collaborative is Indian academia? A case study of top three ranked institutions
The present study employs bibliometric methods to examine the pattern of existing collaboration in India’s top three ranked academic institutes using publications indexed in the Web of Science for the period 2000 to 2020. The results show although the number of collaborations and the degree of collaboration have increased over time, however, the collaboration coefficient remains almost the same in the three institutes. The lesser negative Pearson correlation between authors and articles with a higher positive Pearson correlation between articles and citations for JNU publications suggests that collaboration with a smaller group is more successful than a larger group for gaining citations. Collaborative publications of Banaras Hindu University (36%) and Indian Institute of Science (33%) are more inclined towards authors of the same department, while for Jawaharlal Nehru University, it is with other authors from different universities (41%). The foreign collaboration for all three institutes is almost the same. The network visualization of collaboration in three institutes suggests that the collaborative research in IISc is more diverse than JNU or BHU and in national collaboration, distance between two national organizations also play an important role for strong collaboration. Overall, theoretical aspects of physics lead in collaborative publications followed by chemical sciences. Agricultural biotechnology, clinical medicine, polymer sciences and nanoscience are some emerging disciplines where organizations are increasing their participation through collaborative research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Library and Information Studies
Annals of Library and Information Studies INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
3
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Library and Information Studies is a leading quarterly journal in library and information studies publishing original papers, survey reports, reviews, short communications, and letters pertaining to library science, information science and computer applications in these fields.
期刊最新文献
Annals of Library and Information Studies: Some reflections and future directions A study of ‘calf-path’ in file naming in institutional repositories in India The scope of open peer review in the scholarly publishing ecosystem Collaborative authorship patterns in computer science publications Automatic extraction of significant terms from the title and abstract of scientific papers using the machine learning algorithm: A multiple module approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1