{"title":"紧缩时代的社会投资:欧洲四国家庭政策改革比较","authors":"S. Blum, S. Correia, Mikael Nygård, Tatjana Rakar, K. Wall","doi":"10.3935/RSP.V27I3.1563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The focus of this article is on family policy reforms in four European countries – Austria, Finland, Portugal, and Slovenia – between 2008 and 2015 These years were marked by the ‘Great Recession’, and by the rise of the so-cial-investment perspective Social investment is an umbrella concept, though, and it is also somewhat ambiguous This article distinguishes between different social-investment variants, which emerge from a focus on its interaction with alternative social-policy perspectives, namely social protection and austeri-ty We identify different variants along the degree of social-investment: from comprehensive, over crowding out, towards lean forms While the empirical analysis highlights variation, it also shows how there is a specific crisis context, which may lead to ‘crowding out’ of other policy approaches and ‘leaner’ forms of social investment This has led to strong cutbacks in family cash benefits, while public childcare and parental leaves have proved more resilient in the investigated countries Those findings are revelatory in the current Covid-19 pandemic, where countries are entering a next, possibly larger economic crisis © 2020, University of Zagreb, Faculty of Political Sciences All rights reserved","PeriodicalId":53979,"journal":{"name":"Revija Za Socijalnu Politiku","volume":"27 1","pages":"249-267"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Investment in an Age of Austerity: A Comparison of Family Policy Reforms in Four European Countries\",\"authors\":\"S. Blum, S. Correia, Mikael Nygård, Tatjana Rakar, K. Wall\",\"doi\":\"10.3935/RSP.V27I3.1563\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The focus of this article is on family policy reforms in four European countries – Austria, Finland, Portugal, and Slovenia – between 2008 and 2015 These years were marked by the ‘Great Recession’, and by the rise of the so-cial-investment perspective Social investment is an umbrella concept, though, and it is also somewhat ambiguous This article distinguishes between different social-investment variants, which emerge from a focus on its interaction with alternative social-policy perspectives, namely social protection and austeri-ty We identify different variants along the degree of social-investment: from comprehensive, over crowding out, towards lean forms While the empirical analysis highlights variation, it also shows how there is a specific crisis context, which may lead to ‘crowding out’ of other policy approaches and ‘leaner’ forms of social investment This has led to strong cutbacks in family cash benefits, while public childcare and parental leaves have proved more resilient in the investigated countries Those findings are revelatory in the current Covid-19 pandemic, where countries are entering a next, possibly larger economic crisis © 2020, University of Zagreb, Faculty of Political Sciences All rights reserved\",\"PeriodicalId\":53979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revija Za Socijalnu Politiku\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"249-267\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revija Za Socijalnu Politiku\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3935/RSP.V27I3.1563\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL ISSUES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revija Za Socijalnu Politiku","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3935/RSP.V27I3.1563","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Social Investment in an Age of Austerity: A Comparison of Family Policy Reforms in Four European Countries
The focus of this article is on family policy reforms in four European countries – Austria, Finland, Portugal, and Slovenia – between 2008 and 2015 These years were marked by the ‘Great Recession’, and by the rise of the so-cial-investment perspective Social investment is an umbrella concept, though, and it is also somewhat ambiguous This article distinguishes between different social-investment variants, which emerge from a focus on its interaction with alternative social-policy perspectives, namely social protection and austeri-ty We identify different variants along the degree of social-investment: from comprehensive, over crowding out, towards lean forms While the empirical analysis highlights variation, it also shows how there is a specific crisis context, which may lead to ‘crowding out’ of other policy approaches and ‘leaner’ forms of social investment This has led to strong cutbacks in family cash benefits, while public childcare and parental leaves have proved more resilient in the investigated countries Those findings are revelatory in the current Covid-19 pandemic, where countries are entering a next, possibly larger economic crisis © 2020, University of Zagreb, Faculty of Political Sciences All rights reserved