从孤独到街头:限制性住房对累犯的影响

Valerie A. Clark, G. Duwe
{"title":"从孤独到街头:限制性住房对累犯的影响","authors":"Valerie A. Clark, G. Duwe","doi":"10.1080/23774657.2017.1416318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Restrictive housing is sometimes required for the sake of safety and institutional order. However, many observers have argued that this practice is inhumane and leaves inmates at a greater risk of recidivism. This study empirically examined the effect of restrictive housing on recidivism using a cohort of released state prisoners. The results revealed that time spent in restrictive housing increased the risk of supervision revocations up to two years after release, but did not significantly increase the likelihood of rearrest or re-conviction. Thus, rule-breaking behaviors appear to continue into the community, but not necessarily continued criminal offending.","PeriodicalId":91861,"journal":{"name":"Corrections : policy, practice and research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23774657.2017.1416318","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Solitary to the Streets: The Effect of Restrictive Housing on Recidivism\",\"authors\":\"Valerie A. Clark, G. Duwe\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23774657.2017.1416318\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Restrictive housing is sometimes required for the sake of safety and institutional order. However, many observers have argued that this practice is inhumane and leaves inmates at a greater risk of recidivism. This study empirically examined the effect of restrictive housing on recidivism using a cohort of released state prisoners. The results revealed that time spent in restrictive housing increased the risk of supervision revocations up to two years after release, but did not significantly increase the likelihood of rearrest or re-conviction. Thus, rule-breaking behaviors appear to continue into the community, but not necessarily continued criminal offending.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corrections : policy, practice and research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23774657.2017.1416318\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corrections : policy, practice and research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23774657.2017.1416318\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corrections : policy, practice and research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23774657.2017.1416318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

摘要

为了安全和制度秩序,有时需要限制性住房。然而,许多观察人士认为,这种做法不人道,使囚犯有更大的再犯风险。本研究以一组释放的州囚犯为研究对象,实证检验了限制性住房对累犯的影响。结果显示,在限制性住房中度过的时间增加了释放后两年监管撤销的风险,但没有显著增加再次被捕或再次定罪的可能性。因此,违反规则的行为似乎继续进入社区,但不一定继续犯罪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
From Solitary to the Streets: The Effect of Restrictive Housing on Recidivism
ABSTRACT Restrictive housing is sometimes required for the sake of safety and institutional order. However, many observers have argued that this practice is inhumane and leaves inmates at a greater risk of recidivism. This study empirically examined the effect of restrictive housing on recidivism using a cohort of released state prisoners. The results revealed that time spent in restrictive housing increased the risk of supervision revocations up to two years after release, but did not significantly increase the likelihood of rearrest or re-conviction. Thus, rule-breaking behaviors appear to continue into the community, but not necessarily continued criminal offending.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hands-Off or Hands-On? Examining the Effect of Court Orders on Inmate Misconduct Gender-Responsive Programming for Women in the Community Corrections Context: A Scoping Review Receptivity to Jail-based medication for opioid use disorder among rural detention Administrators The Interplay Between Physical Activity and Psychological, Social, and Perceived Health in Juvenile Corrections Facilities Gender and the Release from Jail: Predicting the Likelihood of a Probation Violation versus a New Offense
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1