S. Hou, E. Santis, Anna V. Eskamani, Khristen Holmes
{"title":"乡村邻里社会凝聚力与生活质量的混合评价方法","authors":"S. Hou, E. Santis, Anna V. Eskamani, Khristen Holmes","doi":"10.1108/qaoa-05-2021-0044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe “Village” model has become an emerging, community-based, social initiative to help older adults age in place. This study aims to examine neighborhood social cohesion (NSC), or social connectedness and quality of life, from the perspective of village members.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA mixed-method evaluation was used to examine two Florida villages, a master-planned village (FV1) and a diverse neighborhood village (FV2). Both are full members of the National Village to Village Network.\n\n\nFindings\nThe quantitative and qualitative data provided complementary and deeper understanding. Quantitative findings showed that FV1 members scored higher at NSC, and qualitative findings further confirmed that village program social activities were critical to building connections, especially for those who have lost loved ones and were single.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nFindings should be interpreted considering the predominantly white racial makeup and affluence of village participants.\n\n\nPractical implications\nFindings point to the importance of NSC as older adults age and suggest that programs should prioritize activities that strengthen social connectiveness.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis is one of the first mixed-methods evaluations examining NSC and quality of life among village participants.\n","PeriodicalId":44916,"journal":{"name":"Quality in Ageing and Older Adults","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mixed methods evaluation on village neighborhood social cohesiveness and quality of life\",\"authors\":\"S. Hou, E. Santis, Anna V. Eskamani, Khristen Holmes\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/qaoa-05-2021-0044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThe “Village” model has become an emerging, community-based, social initiative to help older adults age in place. This study aims to examine neighborhood social cohesion (NSC), or social connectedness and quality of life, from the perspective of village members.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nA mixed-method evaluation was used to examine two Florida villages, a master-planned village (FV1) and a diverse neighborhood village (FV2). Both are full members of the National Village to Village Network.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe quantitative and qualitative data provided complementary and deeper understanding. Quantitative findings showed that FV1 members scored higher at NSC, and qualitative findings further confirmed that village program social activities were critical to building connections, especially for those who have lost loved ones and were single.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nFindings should be interpreted considering the predominantly white racial makeup and affluence of village participants.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nFindings point to the importance of NSC as older adults age and suggest that programs should prioritize activities that strengthen social connectiveness.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis is one of the first mixed-methods evaluations examining NSC and quality of life among village participants.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":44916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quality in Ageing and Older Adults\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quality in Ageing and Older Adults\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/qaoa-05-2021-0044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality in Ageing and Older Adults","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/qaoa-05-2021-0044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mixed methods evaluation on village neighborhood social cohesiveness and quality of life
Purpose
The “Village” model has become an emerging, community-based, social initiative to help older adults age in place. This study aims to examine neighborhood social cohesion (NSC), or social connectedness and quality of life, from the perspective of village members.
Design/methodology/approach
A mixed-method evaluation was used to examine two Florida villages, a master-planned village (FV1) and a diverse neighborhood village (FV2). Both are full members of the National Village to Village Network.
Findings
The quantitative and qualitative data provided complementary and deeper understanding. Quantitative findings showed that FV1 members scored higher at NSC, and qualitative findings further confirmed that village program social activities were critical to building connections, especially for those who have lost loved ones and were single.
Research limitations/implications
Findings should be interpreted considering the predominantly white racial makeup and affluence of village participants.
Practical implications
Findings point to the importance of NSC as older adults age and suggest that programs should prioritize activities that strengthen social connectiveness.
Originality/value
This is one of the first mixed-methods evaluations examining NSC and quality of life among village participants.