乡村邻里社会凝聚力与生活质量的混合评价方法

IF 0.8 Q4 GERONTOLOGY Quality in Ageing and Older Adults Pub Date : 2022-06-09 DOI:10.1108/qaoa-05-2021-0044
S. Hou, E. Santis, Anna V. Eskamani, Khristen Holmes
{"title":"乡村邻里社会凝聚力与生活质量的混合评价方法","authors":"S. Hou, E. Santis, Anna V. Eskamani, Khristen Holmes","doi":"10.1108/qaoa-05-2021-0044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe “Village” model has become an emerging, community-based, social initiative to help older adults age in place. This study aims to examine neighborhood social cohesion (NSC), or social connectedness and quality of life, from the perspective of village members.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA mixed-method evaluation was used to examine two Florida villages, a master-planned village (FV1) and a diverse neighborhood village (FV2). Both are full members of the National Village to Village Network.\n\n\nFindings\nThe quantitative and qualitative data provided complementary and deeper understanding. Quantitative findings showed that FV1 members scored higher at NSC, and qualitative findings further confirmed that village program social activities were critical to building connections, especially for those who have lost loved ones and were single.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nFindings should be interpreted considering the predominantly white racial makeup and affluence of village participants.\n\n\nPractical implications\nFindings point to the importance of NSC as older adults age and suggest that programs should prioritize activities that strengthen social connectiveness.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis is one of the first mixed-methods evaluations examining NSC and quality of life among village participants.\n","PeriodicalId":44916,"journal":{"name":"Quality in Ageing and Older Adults","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mixed methods evaluation on village neighborhood social cohesiveness and quality of life\",\"authors\":\"S. Hou, E. Santis, Anna V. Eskamani, Khristen Holmes\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/qaoa-05-2021-0044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThe “Village” model has become an emerging, community-based, social initiative to help older adults age in place. This study aims to examine neighborhood social cohesion (NSC), or social connectedness and quality of life, from the perspective of village members.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nA mixed-method evaluation was used to examine two Florida villages, a master-planned village (FV1) and a diverse neighborhood village (FV2). Both are full members of the National Village to Village Network.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe quantitative and qualitative data provided complementary and deeper understanding. Quantitative findings showed that FV1 members scored higher at NSC, and qualitative findings further confirmed that village program social activities were critical to building connections, especially for those who have lost loved ones and were single.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nFindings should be interpreted considering the predominantly white racial makeup and affluence of village participants.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nFindings point to the importance of NSC as older adults age and suggest that programs should prioritize activities that strengthen social connectiveness.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis is one of the first mixed-methods evaluations examining NSC and quality of life among village participants.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":44916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quality in Ageing and Older Adults\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quality in Ageing and Older Adults\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/qaoa-05-2021-0044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality in Ageing and Older Adults","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/qaoa-05-2021-0044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的“乡村”模式已成为一种新兴的、以社区为基础的社会倡议,旨在帮助老年人就地养老。本研究旨在从村庄成员的角度考察社区社会凝聚力(NSC),即社会联系和生活质量。设计/方法/方法采用混合方法评估佛罗里达州的两个村庄,一个总体规划村庄(FV1)和一个多样化的社区村庄(FV2)。两人都是国家村村网络的正式成员。芬丁定量和定性数据提供了互补和更深入的理解。定量研究结果显示,FV1成员在NSC中得分更高,定性研究结果进一步证实,乡村项目的社会活动对建立联系至关重要,尤其是对于那些失去亲人和单身的人。研究局限性/含义应考虑到以白人为主的种族构成和村庄参与者的富裕程度来解释研究结果。实际意义研究结果指出,随着老年人年龄的增长,NSC的重要性,并建议项目应优先考虑加强社会联系的活动。独创性/价值这是第一批在村庄参与者中检查NSC和生活质量的混合方法评估之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mixed methods evaluation on village neighborhood social cohesiveness and quality of life
Purpose The “Village” model has become an emerging, community-based, social initiative to help older adults age in place. This study aims to examine neighborhood social cohesion (NSC), or social connectedness and quality of life, from the perspective of village members. Design/methodology/approach A mixed-method evaluation was used to examine two Florida villages, a master-planned village (FV1) and a diverse neighborhood village (FV2). Both are full members of the National Village to Village Network. Findings The quantitative and qualitative data provided complementary and deeper understanding. Quantitative findings showed that FV1 members scored higher at NSC, and qualitative findings further confirmed that village program social activities were critical to building connections, especially for those who have lost loved ones and were single. Research limitations/implications Findings should be interpreted considering the predominantly white racial makeup and affluence of village participants. Practical implications Findings point to the importance of NSC as older adults age and suggest that programs should prioritize activities that strengthen social connectiveness. Originality/value This is one of the first mixed-methods evaluations examining NSC and quality of life among village participants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Involving older adults and unpaid carers in the research cycle: reflections on implementing the UK national standards for public involvement into practice The relationship between older adults’ perceptions of ageing and depression: a systematic review Participatory action research and empowerment of nursing home residents Cognitive functioning and life satisfaction as predictors of subjective health complaints in elderly people Editorial: Recognising new partners and activities in older peoples’ care but also potential burdens in new forms of care and research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1