康德早期哲学中自然规律的优先性

IF 0.4 3区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY Res Philosophica Pub Date : 2021-06-25 DOI:10.11612/resphil.2029
Aaron Wells
{"title":"康德早期哲学中自然规律的优先性","authors":"Aaron Wells","doi":"10.11612/resphil.2029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": It is widely held that, in his pre-Critical works, Kant endorsed a necessitation account of laws of nature, where laws are grounded in essences or causal powers. Against this, I argue that the early Kant endorsed the priority of laws in explaining and unifying the natural world, as well as their irreducible role in in grounding natural necessity. Laws are a key constituent of Kant’s explanatory naturalism, rather than undermining it. By laying out neglected distinctions Kant draws among types of natural law, grounding relations, and ontological levels, I show that his early works present a coherent and sophisticated laws-first account of the natural order.","PeriodicalId":44475,"journal":{"name":"Res Philosophica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Priority of Natural Laws in Kant's Early Philosophy\",\"authors\":\"Aaron Wells\",\"doi\":\"10.11612/resphil.2029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": It is widely held that, in his pre-Critical works, Kant endorsed a necessitation account of laws of nature, where laws are grounded in essences or causal powers. Against this, I argue that the early Kant endorsed the priority of laws in explaining and unifying the natural world, as well as their irreducible role in in grounding natural necessity. Laws are a key constituent of Kant’s explanatory naturalism, rather than undermining it. By laying out neglected distinctions Kant draws among types of natural law, grounding relations, and ontological levels, I show that his early works present a coherent and sophisticated laws-first account of the natural order.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Res Philosophica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Res Philosophica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11612/resphil.2029\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Res Philosophica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11612/resphil.2029","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们普遍认为,在康德前批判时期的著作中,他赞同自然法则的必然解释,认为法则是建立在本质或因果力量的基础上的。与此相反,我认为早期的康德赞同法则在解释和统一自然世界中的优先地位,以及它们在奠定自然必然性方面不可简化的作用。法律是康德解释性自然主义的关键组成部分,而不是破坏它。通过列出康德在自然法则类型、基础关系和本体论层面中所描绘的被忽视的区别,我表明,他的早期作品呈现了一种连贯而复杂的自然秩序的法则优先描述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Priority of Natural Laws in Kant's Early Philosophy
: It is widely held that, in his pre-Critical works, Kant endorsed a necessitation account of laws of nature, where laws are grounded in essences or causal powers. Against this, I argue that the early Kant endorsed the priority of laws in explaining and unifying the natural world, as well as their irreducible role in in grounding natural necessity. Laws are a key constituent of Kant’s explanatory naturalism, rather than undermining it. By laying out neglected distinctions Kant draws among types of natural law, grounding relations, and ontological levels, I show that his early works present a coherent and sophisticated laws-first account of the natural order.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Res Philosophica
Res Philosophica PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Sosa on the New Evil Demon Problem A Neuro-Yogācāra Manifesto Holistic Cognitive Style, Chinese Culture, and the Sinification of Buddhism Why Variation Matters to Philosophy ``See You in Your Next Life'': Creativity, the Zhuangzi, and Grief
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1