函数数据协方差结构差异的稳健非参数假设检验

IF 0.8 4区 数学 Q3 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY Canadian Journal of Statistics-Revue Canadienne De Statistique Pub Date : 2023-03-25 DOI:10.1002/cjs.11767
Kelly Ramsay, Shoja'eddin Chenouri
{"title":"函数数据协方差结构差异的稳健非参数假设检验","authors":"Kelly Ramsay,&nbsp;Shoja'eddin Chenouri","doi":"10.1002/cjs.11767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We develop a group of robust, nonparametric hypothesis tests that detect differences between the covariance operators of several populations of functional data. These tests, called functional Kruskal–Wallis tests for covariance, or FKWC tests, are based on functional data depth ranks. FKWC tests work well even when the data are heavy-tailed, which is shown both in simulation and theory. FKWC tests offer several other benefits: they have a simple asymptotic distribution under the null hypothesis, they are computationally cheap, and they possess transformation-invariance properties. We show that under general alternative hypotheses, these tests are consistent under mild, nonparametric assumptions. As a result, we introduce a new functional depth function called <math>\n <msup>\n <mrow>\n <mi>L</mi>\n </mrow>\n <mrow>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </mrow>\n </msup></math>-root depth that works well for the purposes of detecting differences in magnitude between covariance kernels. We present an analysis of the FKWC test based on <math>\n <msup>\n <mrow>\n <mi>L</mi>\n </mrow>\n <mrow>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </mrow>\n </msup></math>-root depth under local alternatives. Through simulations, when the true covariance kernels have an infinite number of positive eigenvalues, we show that these tests have higher power than their competitors while maintaining their nominal size. We also provide a method for computing sample size and performing multiple comparisons.</p>","PeriodicalId":55281,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Statistics-Revue Canadienne De Statistique","volume":"52 1","pages":"43-78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robust nonparametric hypothesis tests for differences in the covariance structure of functional data\",\"authors\":\"Kelly Ramsay,&nbsp;Shoja'eddin Chenouri\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cjs.11767\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We develop a group of robust, nonparametric hypothesis tests that detect differences between the covariance operators of several populations of functional data. These tests, called functional Kruskal–Wallis tests for covariance, or FKWC tests, are based on functional data depth ranks. FKWC tests work well even when the data are heavy-tailed, which is shown both in simulation and theory. FKWC tests offer several other benefits: they have a simple asymptotic distribution under the null hypothesis, they are computationally cheap, and they possess transformation-invariance properties. We show that under general alternative hypotheses, these tests are consistent under mild, nonparametric assumptions. As a result, we introduce a new functional depth function called <math>\\n <msup>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>L</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>2</mn>\\n </mrow>\\n </msup></math>-root depth that works well for the purposes of detecting differences in magnitude between covariance kernels. We present an analysis of the FKWC test based on <math>\\n <msup>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>L</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>2</mn>\\n </mrow>\\n </msup></math>-root depth under local alternatives. Through simulations, when the true covariance kernels have an infinite number of positive eigenvalues, we show that these tests have higher power than their competitors while maintaining their nominal size. We also provide a method for computing sample size and performing multiple comparisons.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Statistics-Revue Canadienne De Statistique\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"43-78\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Statistics-Revue Canadienne De Statistique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cjs.11767\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Statistics-Revue Canadienne De Statistique","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cjs.11767","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们开发了一组鲁棒的非参数假设检验,用于检测几个功能数据总体的协方差算子之间的差异。这些测试称为FKWC测试,基于功能数据深度排名。这些测试即使在数据是重尾的情况下也能很好地工作,这在模拟和理论上都得到了证明。这些测试还提供了其他一些好处,它们在零假设下有一个简单的分布,它们的计算成本很低,并且它们具有变换不变性。我们表明,在一般替代假设下,这些检验在温和的非参数假设下是一致的。作为这项工作的结果,我们引入了一个新的功能深度函数,称为l2 -根深度,它可以很好地用于检测协方差核之间的幅度差异。我们提出了在局部替代方案下使用l2根深度的FKWC测试的分析。在模拟中,当真正的协方差核具有严格的正特征值时,我们表明这些测试比它们的竞争对手具有更高的功率,同时仍然保持其标称大小。我们还提供了一种计算样本大小和执行多重比较的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Robust nonparametric hypothesis tests for differences in the covariance structure of functional data

We develop a group of robust, nonparametric hypothesis tests that detect differences between the covariance operators of several populations of functional data. These tests, called functional Kruskal–Wallis tests for covariance, or FKWC tests, are based on functional data depth ranks. FKWC tests work well even when the data are heavy-tailed, which is shown both in simulation and theory. FKWC tests offer several other benefits: they have a simple asymptotic distribution under the null hypothesis, they are computationally cheap, and they possess transformation-invariance properties. We show that under general alternative hypotheses, these tests are consistent under mild, nonparametric assumptions. As a result, we introduce a new functional depth function called L 2 -root depth that works well for the purposes of detecting differences in magnitude between covariance kernels. We present an analysis of the FKWC test based on L 2 -root depth under local alternatives. Through simulations, when the true covariance kernels have an infinite number of positive eigenvalues, we show that these tests have higher power than their competitors while maintaining their nominal size. We also provide a method for computing sample size and performing multiple comparisons.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Statistics is the official journal of the Statistical Society of Canada. It has a reputation internationally as an excellent journal. The editorial board is comprised of statistical scientists with applied, computational, methodological, theoretical and probabilistic interests. Their role is to ensure that the journal continues to provide an international forum for the discipline of Statistics. The journal seeks papers making broad points of interest to many readers, whereas papers making important points of more specific interest are better placed in more specialized journals. The levels of innovation and impact are key in the evaluation of submitted manuscripts.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information True and false discoveries with independent and sequential e-values Issue Information Multiple change-point detection for regression curves Robust estimation of loss-based measures of model performance under covariate shift
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1