当观测结果不是独立且相同分布时,会出现什么问题:关于计算不同实验或条件下组合数据集相关性的注意事项

E. Saccenti
{"title":"当观测结果不是独立且相同分布时,会出现什么问题:关于计算不同实验或条件下组合数据集相关性的注意事项","authors":"E. Saccenti","doi":"10.3389/fsysb.2023.1042156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the scientific literature data analysis results are often presented when samples from different experiments or different conditions, technical replicates or times series are merged to increase the sample size before calculating the correlation coefficient. This way of proceeding violates two basic assumptions underlying the use of the correlation coefficient: sampling from one population and independence of the observations (independence of errors). Since correlations are used to measure and infer associations between biological entities, this has tremendous implications on the reliability of scientific results, as the violation of these assumption leads to wrong and biased results. In this technical note, I review some basic properties of the Pearson’s correlation coefficient and illustrate some exemplary problems with simulated and experimental data, taking a didactic approach with the use of supporting graphical examples.","PeriodicalId":73109,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in systems biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What can go wrong when observations are not independently and identically distributed: A cautionary note on calculating correlations on combined data sets from different experiments or conditions\",\"authors\":\"E. Saccenti\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fsysb.2023.1042156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the scientific literature data analysis results are often presented when samples from different experiments or different conditions, technical replicates or times series are merged to increase the sample size before calculating the correlation coefficient. This way of proceeding violates two basic assumptions underlying the use of the correlation coefficient: sampling from one population and independence of the observations (independence of errors). Since correlations are used to measure and infer associations between biological entities, this has tremendous implications on the reliability of scientific results, as the violation of these assumption leads to wrong and biased results. In this technical note, I review some basic properties of the Pearson’s correlation coefficient and illustrate some exemplary problems with simulated and experimental data, taking a didactic approach with the use of supporting graphical examples.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in systems biology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in systems biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsysb.2023.1042156\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in systems biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsysb.2023.1042156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在科学文献中,数据分析结果往往是通过合并不同实验或不同条件下的样本、技术重复或时间序列来增加样本量,然后再计算相关系数。这种处理方式违反了使用相关系数的两个基本假设:从一个总体中抽样和观察结果的独立性(误差的独立性)。由于相关性是用来衡量和推断生物实体之间的关联的,这对科学结果的可靠性有着巨大的影响,因为违反这些假设会导致错误和有偏差的结果。在这篇技术笔记中,我回顾了皮尔逊相关系数的一些基本性质,并用模拟和实验数据说明了一些示例性问题,采用教学方法使用支持图形示例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What can go wrong when observations are not independently and identically distributed: A cautionary note on calculating correlations on combined data sets from different experiments or conditions
In the scientific literature data analysis results are often presented when samples from different experiments or different conditions, technical replicates or times series are merged to increase the sample size before calculating the correlation coefficient. This way of proceeding violates two basic assumptions underlying the use of the correlation coefficient: sampling from one population and independence of the observations (independence of errors). Since correlations are used to measure and infer associations between biological entities, this has tremendous implications on the reliability of scientific results, as the violation of these assumption leads to wrong and biased results. In this technical note, I review some basic properties of the Pearson’s correlation coefficient and illustrate some exemplary problems with simulated and experimental data, taking a didactic approach with the use of supporting graphical examples.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Transporter annotations are holding up progress in metabolic modeling Life’s building blocks: the modular path to multiscale complexity Coupling quantitative systems pharmacology modelling to machine learning and artificial intelligence for drug development: its pAIns and gAIns Predicting chronic responses to calcium channel blockade with a virtual population of African Americans with hypertensive chronic kidney disease Building an Adverse Outcome Pathway network for COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1