热处理镍钛锉系统治疗单次牙髓病术后疼痛的比较——一项随机临床试验

Q3 Dentistry Endodontology Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.4103/endo.endo_202_21
Priyanka Unnikrishnan, Lalitagauri P. Mandke, L. Padhye
{"title":"热处理镍钛锉系统治疗单次牙髓病术后疼痛的比较——一项随机临床试验","authors":"Priyanka Unnikrishnan, Lalitagauri P. Mandke, L. Padhye","doi":"10.4103/endo.endo_202_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The aim of the present study was to compare postoperative pain in single visit endodontics using heat-treated nickel − titanium file systems (ProTaper Gold, HyFlex EDM, V Taper 2H). Methods: Sixty patients requiring endodontic treatment in vital permanent lower molars with irreversible pulpitis were included in the study. Patients were divided into three groups each containing 20 patients: Group 1 teeth prepared with ProTaper Gold (Dentsply), Group 2 HyFlex EDM (Coltene), and Group 3-V Taper 2H (SS WHITE). Treatment was performed in a single visit. The severity of the postoperative pain was assessed by the Visual Analog Scale after 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis tests. Results: There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative pain among the three groups. There was significant reduction in pain from preoperative till the end of 2 days, irrespective of the file systems used. When compared between the three groups. There was no significant difference in pain scores at different time intervals. When change in pain from preoperative to different time intervals was compared, there was no significant difference between all three groups. V Taper 2H files showed increased pain scores from 4 to 12 h, however, the pain reduced thereafter till 48 h with no significant statistical difference. Conclusion: Results of this in vivo study showed that there was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative pain among the three groups.","PeriodicalId":11607,"journal":{"name":"Endodontology","volume":"35 1","pages":"94 - 99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of postoperative pain in single visit endodontics using heat-treated nickel − titanium file systems – A randomized clinical trial\",\"authors\":\"Priyanka Unnikrishnan, Lalitagauri P. Mandke, L. Padhye\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/endo.endo_202_21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: The aim of the present study was to compare postoperative pain in single visit endodontics using heat-treated nickel − titanium file systems (ProTaper Gold, HyFlex EDM, V Taper 2H). Methods: Sixty patients requiring endodontic treatment in vital permanent lower molars with irreversible pulpitis were included in the study. Patients were divided into three groups each containing 20 patients: Group 1 teeth prepared with ProTaper Gold (Dentsply), Group 2 HyFlex EDM (Coltene), and Group 3-V Taper 2H (SS WHITE). Treatment was performed in a single visit. The severity of the postoperative pain was assessed by the Visual Analog Scale after 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis tests. Results: There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative pain among the three groups. There was significant reduction in pain from preoperative till the end of 2 days, irrespective of the file systems used. When compared between the three groups. There was no significant difference in pain scores at different time intervals. When change in pain from preoperative to different time intervals was compared, there was no significant difference between all three groups. V Taper 2H files showed increased pain scores from 4 to 12 h, however, the pain reduced thereafter till 48 h with no significant statistical difference. Conclusion: Results of this in vivo study showed that there was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative pain among the three groups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11607,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endodontology\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"94 - 99\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endodontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/endo.endo_202_21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endodontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/endo.endo_202_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是比较使用热处理镍钛锉系统(ProTaper Gold、HyFlex EDM、V Taper 2H)进行单次根管治疗的术后疼痛。方法:对60例患有不可逆牙髓炎的重要恒下磨牙患者进行牙髓治疗。患者被分为三组,每组20名患者:第1组用ProTaper Gold(Dentsply)制备的牙齿,第2组HyFlex EDM(Coltene)和第3-V组Taper 2H(SS WHITE)。治疗在一次就诊中进行。术后疼痛的严重程度在2、4、8、12、24和48小时后通过视觉模拟量表进行评估。数据使用Kruskal–Wallis测试进行分析。结果:三组患者术后疼痛发生率差异无统计学意义。从术前到2天结束,无论使用何种文件系统,疼痛都显著减轻。当在三组之间进行比较时。不同时间间隔的疼痛评分没有显著差异。当比较从术前到不同时间间隔的疼痛变化时,三组之间没有显著差异。V Taper 2H文件显示,从4到12小时疼痛评分增加,但此后疼痛减轻,直到48小时,没有显著的统计学差异。结论:这项体内研究的结果表明,三组患者术后疼痛的发生率没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of postoperative pain in single visit endodontics using heat-treated nickel − titanium file systems – A randomized clinical trial
Aim: The aim of the present study was to compare postoperative pain in single visit endodontics using heat-treated nickel − titanium file systems (ProTaper Gold, HyFlex EDM, V Taper 2H). Methods: Sixty patients requiring endodontic treatment in vital permanent lower molars with irreversible pulpitis were included in the study. Patients were divided into three groups each containing 20 patients: Group 1 teeth prepared with ProTaper Gold (Dentsply), Group 2 HyFlex EDM (Coltene), and Group 3-V Taper 2H (SS WHITE). Treatment was performed in a single visit. The severity of the postoperative pain was assessed by the Visual Analog Scale after 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 h. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis tests. Results: There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative pain among the three groups. There was significant reduction in pain from preoperative till the end of 2 days, irrespective of the file systems used. When compared between the three groups. There was no significant difference in pain scores at different time intervals. When change in pain from preoperative to different time intervals was compared, there was no significant difference between all three groups. V Taper 2H files showed increased pain scores from 4 to 12 h, however, the pain reduced thereafter till 48 h with no significant statistical difference. Conclusion: Results of this in vivo study showed that there was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative pain among the three groups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Endodontology
Endodontology Medicine-Anatomy
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparative evaluation of the clinical and radiographic success of regenerative endodontic procedures in immature versus mature permanent incisors with apical periodontitis: A prospective observational study Sealing efficacy of various rubber dam barrier materials used for isolation procedures: A randomized controlled trial Evaluation of fracture resistance of radicular dentin treated with nanochitosan-loaded calcium hydroxide and nanographene-loaded calcium hydroxide, when used as intracanal medicament: An in vitro study Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars using indirect and direct composite onlays: A comparative study Effect of bonding pericervical dentin with reinforcing materials on strength of root-filled mandibular single-canal premolars: An in vitro study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1