玉米、棉花和花生对行距、播种量和灌溉系统的响应

IF 1 Q3 AGRONOMY Journal of Crop Improvement Pub Date : 2022-07-04 DOI:10.1080/15427528.2022.2093809
R. Sorensen, M. Lamb, C. Butts
{"title":"玉米、棉花和花生对行距、播种量和灌溉系统的响应","authors":"R. Sorensen, M. Lamb, C. Butts","doi":"10.1080/15427528.2022.2093809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Planting crop rows closer to a drip line water source should result in increased seed development, greater crop yield, and possible water savings and may reduce seeding rate without affecting yield, resulting in lower seed costs. This research documents the yield response of corn, cotton, and peanut planted in two crop row spacings (0.76 and 0.91 m), at two seeding rates (1× and 0.5×), at four locations, and two irrigation systems (sprinkler and drip). Crops were managed using best management practices for maximum yield. Irrigation events were scheduled to minimize soil water stress. There was no yield response across all crops, locations, or irrigation systems for 0.76 versus 0.91-m crop row spacing. The 0.5× seeding rate in drip irrigation and across all sites reduced corn yield and revenue by an average 1572 kg/ha and $-94/ha, respectively. The 0.5× seeding rate in drip irrigation did not decrease yield in cotton or peanut and revenue above seed cost averaged $16 and $95/ha, respectively. It should be noted that in cotton and peanut, the 0.5× seeding rate may impose a greater risk for yield loss due to low germination due to drought (cotton) and increased disease (peanut). In conclusion, moving the seed row closer to a drip lateral had no effect on yield and using 0.5× seeding rates for these crops may not always be economical.","PeriodicalId":15468,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Crop Improvement","volume":"37 1","pages":"323 - 340"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corn, cotton, and peanut response to row spacing, seeding rate, and irrigation system\",\"authors\":\"R. Sorensen, M. Lamb, C. Butts\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15427528.2022.2093809\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Planting crop rows closer to a drip line water source should result in increased seed development, greater crop yield, and possible water savings and may reduce seeding rate without affecting yield, resulting in lower seed costs. This research documents the yield response of corn, cotton, and peanut planted in two crop row spacings (0.76 and 0.91 m), at two seeding rates (1× and 0.5×), at four locations, and two irrigation systems (sprinkler and drip). Crops were managed using best management practices for maximum yield. Irrigation events were scheduled to minimize soil water stress. There was no yield response across all crops, locations, or irrigation systems for 0.76 versus 0.91-m crop row spacing. The 0.5× seeding rate in drip irrigation and across all sites reduced corn yield and revenue by an average 1572 kg/ha and $-94/ha, respectively. The 0.5× seeding rate in drip irrigation did not decrease yield in cotton or peanut and revenue above seed cost averaged $16 and $95/ha, respectively. It should be noted that in cotton and peanut, the 0.5× seeding rate may impose a greater risk for yield loss due to low germination due to drought (cotton) and increased disease (peanut). In conclusion, moving the seed row closer to a drip lateral had no effect on yield and using 0.5× seeding rates for these crops may not always be economical.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15468,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Crop Improvement\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"323 - 340\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Crop Improvement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15427528.2022.2093809\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Crop Improvement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15427528.2022.2093809","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在靠近滴灌水源的地方种植作物行可以促进种子发育,提高作物产量,并可能节约用水,在不影响产量的情况下降低播种率,从而降低种子成本。本研究记录了玉米、棉花和花生在2种作物行距(0.76和0.91 m)、2种播种率(1倍和0.5倍)、4个地点、2种灌溉系统(洒水和滴灌)下的产量响应。作物采用最佳管理方法进行管理,以获得最大产量。灌溉活动的安排是为了尽量减少土壤水分压力。当作物行距为0.76 m与0.91 m时,所有作物、地点或灌溉系统均无产量响应。在滴灌和所有地点,0.5倍的播种率平均使玉米产量和收入分别减少1572公斤/公顷和-94美元/公顷。0.5倍播种量的滴灌对棉花和花生的产量没有影响,高于种子成本的收益平均分别为16美元和95美元/公顷。需要注意的是,在棉花和花生中,0.5倍的播种率可能会造成更大的产量损失风险,因为干旱(棉花)导致发芽率低,而病害(花生)增加。综上所述,将种子行移近滴灌横向对产量没有影响,对这些作物使用0.5倍的播种率可能并不总是经济的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Corn, cotton, and peanut response to row spacing, seeding rate, and irrigation system
ABSTRACT Planting crop rows closer to a drip line water source should result in increased seed development, greater crop yield, and possible water savings and may reduce seeding rate without affecting yield, resulting in lower seed costs. This research documents the yield response of corn, cotton, and peanut planted in two crop row spacings (0.76 and 0.91 m), at two seeding rates (1× and 0.5×), at four locations, and two irrigation systems (sprinkler and drip). Crops were managed using best management practices for maximum yield. Irrigation events were scheduled to minimize soil water stress. There was no yield response across all crops, locations, or irrigation systems for 0.76 versus 0.91-m crop row spacing. The 0.5× seeding rate in drip irrigation and across all sites reduced corn yield and revenue by an average 1572 kg/ha and $-94/ha, respectively. The 0.5× seeding rate in drip irrigation did not decrease yield in cotton or peanut and revenue above seed cost averaged $16 and $95/ha, respectively. It should be noted that in cotton and peanut, the 0.5× seeding rate may impose a greater risk for yield loss due to low germination due to drought (cotton) and increased disease (peanut). In conclusion, moving the seed row closer to a drip lateral had no effect on yield and using 0.5× seeding rates for these crops may not always be economical.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology (JCSB) is a peer-reviewed international journal published four times a year. JCSB publishes novel and advanced original research articles on topics related to the production science of field crops and resource plants, including cropping systems, sustainable agriculture, environmental change, post-harvest management, biodiversity, crop improvement, and recent advances in physiology and molecular biology. Also covered are related subjects in a wide range of sciences such as the ecological and physiological aspects of crop production and genetic, breeding, and biotechnological approaches for crop improvement.
期刊最新文献
Potato disease prediction using machine learning, image processing and IoT – a systematic literature survey Determining morphological and biochemical indices to select for smut-resistant sugarcane varieties Characterization and morphological diversity of sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum ) genotypes based on descriptor traits Time to treat the climate and nature crisis as one indivisible global health emergency Successful fertility restoration in male-sterile barnase line by optimal expression of barstar gene for hybrid-rice seed production
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1