静脉注射N-乙酰半胱氨酸治疗对乙酰氨基酚毒性的费用

A. Dalabih, C. Cox, Jordan Anderson
{"title":"静脉注射N-乙酰半胱氨酸治疗对乙酰氨基酚毒性的费用","authors":"A. Dalabih, C. Cox, Jordan Anderson","doi":"10.21037/JHMHP-20-87","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"study Background: Intravenous (IV) N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is the treatment of choice for acetaminophen (APAP) toxicity. The initiation of NAC should be based on specific criteria depicted by the Rumack-Matthew Nomogram. The treatment requires hospital admission and frequent laboratory tests, making it a costly treatment. The purpose of this analysis is to determine the financial impact of inappropriate IV NAC use for APAP toxicity. Methods: This single-center, retrospective chart review included adult and pediatric subjects who received at least one dose of IV NAC at a tertiary academic medical center for acute and chronic APAP toxicity. Primary objective; determine the financial impact of inappropriate use of IV-NAC concerning compliance with the nomogram when initiating the treatment. Secondary objectives; missed cost-saving opportunities resulting from non-compliance with treatment regimen recommendations for maximum doses, and the number of dosing cycles. Cost analysis was completed by the hospital billing department and utilized true cost charges. Total cost of hospitalization was calculated, and total medication charges were evaluated separately using the hospital’s group purchasing organization (GPO) pricing. Results: Ninety-six subjects were included in the final analysis. A potential savings of $253,891.85 United States Dollars (USD) could have been realized if the administration guidelines were followed. NAC was inappropriately initiated in 20 of the 56 subjects (35.7%) with an acute, known time of APAP ingestion. Of the 346 total doses of IV NAC administered throughout the study (n=47, 13.6%) exceeded manufacturer maximum suggested recommendations. The higher doses were all related to subjects with body weight higher than 100 kg. Conclusions: The results from this study show a high financial cost on the healthcare system when providers inappropriately initiate IV NAC for acute APAP toxicity. Healthcare systems should follow the administration guidelines of IV NAC to decrease overall expenses and potential adverse effects. Utilizing order sets to guide appropriate therapy initiation and/or discontinuation is advisable. A careful review of pertinent laboratory values and collaboration with regional Poison Control Centers to determine treatment duration may also be warranted.","PeriodicalId":92075,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital management and health policy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost of inappropriate use of intravenous N-acetylcysteine for acetaminophen toxicity\",\"authors\":\"A. Dalabih, C. Cox, Jordan Anderson\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/JHMHP-20-87\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"study Background: Intravenous (IV) N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is the treatment of choice for acetaminophen (APAP) toxicity. The initiation of NAC should be based on specific criteria depicted by the Rumack-Matthew Nomogram. The treatment requires hospital admission and frequent laboratory tests, making it a costly treatment. The purpose of this analysis is to determine the financial impact of inappropriate IV NAC use for APAP toxicity. Methods: This single-center, retrospective chart review included adult and pediatric subjects who received at least one dose of IV NAC at a tertiary academic medical center for acute and chronic APAP toxicity. Primary objective; determine the financial impact of inappropriate use of IV-NAC concerning compliance with the nomogram when initiating the treatment. Secondary objectives; missed cost-saving opportunities resulting from non-compliance with treatment regimen recommendations for maximum doses, and the number of dosing cycles. Cost analysis was completed by the hospital billing department and utilized true cost charges. Total cost of hospitalization was calculated, and total medication charges were evaluated separately using the hospital’s group purchasing organization (GPO) pricing. Results: Ninety-six subjects were included in the final analysis. A potential savings of $253,891.85 United States Dollars (USD) could have been realized if the administration guidelines were followed. NAC was inappropriately initiated in 20 of the 56 subjects (35.7%) with an acute, known time of APAP ingestion. Of the 346 total doses of IV NAC administered throughout the study (n=47, 13.6%) exceeded manufacturer maximum suggested recommendations. The higher doses were all related to subjects with body weight higher than 100 kg. Conclusions: The results from this study show a high financial cost on the healthcare system when providers inappropriately initiate IV NAC for acute APAP toxicity. Healthcare systems should follow the administration guidelines of IV NAC to decrease overall expenses and potential adverse effects. Utilizing order sets to guide appropriate therapy initiation and/or discontinuation is advisable. A careful review of pertinent laboratory values and collaboration with regional Poison Control Centers to determine treatment duration may also be warranted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of hospital management and health policy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of hospital management and health policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/JHMHP-20-87\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hospital management and health policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/JHMHP-20-87","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

研究背景:静脉注射n -乙酰半胱氨酸(NAC)是治疗对乙酰氨基酚(APAP)毒性的首选方法。NAC的启动应该基于Rumack-Matthew Nomogram所描述的特定标准。治疗需要住院和频繁的实验室检查,使其成为一种昂贵的治疗方法。本分析的目的是确定不适当IV NAC用于APAP毒性的财务影响。方法:这项单中心、回顾性图表综述包括在三级学术医疗中心接受至少一剂静脉NAC治疗急性和慢性APAP毒性的成人和儿童受试者。主要目标;确定在开始治疗时不适当使用IV-NAC对依从性的财务影响。次要目标;由于不遵守治疗方案建议的最大剂量和给药周期数,错过了节省成本的机会。成本分析由医院计费部门完成,采用真实成本收费。计算住院总费用,采用医院团购组织(GPO)定价分别评估总用药费用。结果:96名受试者纳入最终分析。如果执行行政指导方针,可能节省253,891.85美元。56例受试者中有20例(35.7%)出现急性、已知APAP摄入时间的NAC不适当启动。在整个研究过程中,静脉注射NAC的346个总剂量(n=47, 13.6%)超过了制造商建议的最大剂量。较高的剂量均与体重高于100公斤的受试者有关。结论:本研究的结果表明,当提供者不适当地开始静脉NAC治疗急性APAP毒性时,医疗保健系统的财务成本很高。医疗保健系统应遵循静脉NAC的管理指南,以减少总费用和潜在的不良反应。建议使用指令集来指导适当的治疗开始和/或停止。仔细审查相关的实验室值,并与区域毒物控制中心合作,以确定治疗时间也是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cost of inappropriate use of intravenous N-acetylcysteine for acetaminophen toxicity
study Background: Intravenous (IV) N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is the treatment of choice for acetaminophen (APAP) toxicity. The initiation of NAC should be based on specific criteria depicted by the Rumack-Matthew Nomogram. The treatment requires hospital admission and frequent laboratory tests, making it a costly treatment. The purpose of this analysis is to determine the financial impact of inappropriate IV NAC use for APAP toxicity. Methods: This single-center, retrospective chart review included adult and pediatric subjects who received at least one dose of IV NAC at a tertiary academic medical center for acute and chronic APAP toxicity. Primary objective; determine the financial impact of inappropriate use of IV-NAC concerning compliance with the nomogram when initiating the treatment. Secondary objectives; missed cost-saving opportunities resulting from non-compliance with treatment regimen recommendations for maximum doses, and the number of dosing cycles. Cost analysis was completed by the hospital billing department and utilized true cost charges. Total cost of hospitalization was calculated, and total medication charges were evaluated separately using the hospital’s group purchasing organization (GPO) pricing. Results: Ninety-six subjects were included in the final analysis. A potential savings of $253,891.85 United States Dollars (USD) could have been realized if the administration guidelines were followed. NAC was inappropriately initiated in 20 of the 56 subjects (35.7%) with an acute, known time of APAP ingestion. Of the 346 total doses of IV NAC administered throughout the study (n=47, 13.6%) exceeded manufacturer maximum suggested recommendations. The higher doses were all related to subjects with body weight higher than 100 kg. Conclusions: The results from this study show a high financial cost on the healthcare system when providers inappropriately initiate IV NAC for acute APAP toxicity. Healthcare systems should follow the administration guidelines of IV NAC to decrease overall expenses and potential adverse effects. Utilizing order sets to guide appropriate therapy initiation and/or discontinuation is advisable. A careful review of pertinent laboratory values and collaboration with regional Poison Control Centers to determine treatment duration may also be warranted.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Recent trends in hospital market concentration and profitability: the case of New Jersey COVID-19 outbreak and integration of social media in public health crisis communication: a case study of UMMC, Kuala Lumpur Spatial disparities in flood vulnerability in New York City Spatial and visual comparison analysis of health disparities in London neighbourhoods: the case of Southwark and Lambeth Impact of COVID-19 on operation room utilization efficiency and cardiac surgery care pathway: single centre experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1