昆士兰数据对固结系数的评估

IF 0.3 Q4 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Australian Geomechanics Journal Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.56295/agj5825
B. Look
{"title":"昆士兰数据对固结系数的评估","authors":"B. Look","doi":"10.56295/agj5825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Established relationships between the coefficient of consolidation (cv) and index tests are used during both preliminary design and as a cross check during detailed design. The laboratory oedometer test provides compressibility parameters and a lower bound of cv, while the coefficients of consolidation are preferred from the field dissipation tests. However, cv is dependent on the method used to determine its value, stress level, and over-consolidation ratio. In practice, the coefficient of consolidation values obtained from dissipation tests are used to predict settlement time, while oedometer tests are useful in obtaining the parameter required to predict the magnitude of settlement. However, dissipation tests measure the horizontal coefficient of consolidation (ch) which needs to be related back to the vertical value. These standard approaches are discussed using test data from Queensland sites. Inconsistencies in correlations are used to show that design should consider the wide variability in interpretations that can occur, and correlations of cv with index tests should not be used in detailed design. Additionally, the cv values obtained from oedometer testing is a poor predictor of time for consolidation. This could also be due to the size of samples being not large enough for the soil structure. Monitoring data from construction sites are used to assess a “moderately” conservative design value from dissipation and lab tests.","PeriodicalId":43619,"journal":{"name":"Australian Geomechanics Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of the coefficient of consolidation with Queensland data\",\"authors\":\"B. Look\",\"doi\":\"10.56295/agj5825\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Established relationships between the coefficient of consolidation (cv) and index tests are used during both preliminary design and as a cross check during detailed design. The laboratory oedometer test provides compressibility parameters and a lower bound of cv, while the coefficients of consolidation are preferred from the field dissipation tests. However, cv is dependent on the method used to determine its value, stress level, and over-consolidation ratio. In practice, the coefficient of consolidation values obtained from dissipation tests are used to predict settlement time, while oedometer tests are useful in obtaining the parameter required to predict the magnitude of settlement. However, dissipation tests measure the horizontal coefficient of consolidation (ch) which needs to be related back to the vertical value. These standard approaches are discussed using test data from Queensland sites. Inconsistencies in correlations are used to show that design should consider the wide variability in interpretations that can occur, and correlations of cv with index tests should not be used in detailed design. Additionally, the cv values obtained from oedometer testing is a poor predictor of time for consolidation. This could also be due to the size of samples being not large enough for the soil structure. Monitoring data from construction sites are used to assess a “moderately” conservative design value from dissipation and lab tests.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43619,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Geomechanics Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Geomechanics Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56295/agj5825\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Geomechanics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56295/agj5825","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

固结系数(cv)和指标试验之间建立的关系在初步设计和详细设计期间用作交叉检查。室内测压计试验提供了压缩性参数和cv的下界,而固结系数优选来自现场耗散试验。然而,cv取决于用于确定其值、应力水平和超固结比的方法。在实践中,从耗散试验中得到的固结系数值用于预测沉降时间,而里程表试验用于获得预测沉降幅度所需的参数。然而,耗散试验测量的水平固结系数(ch)需要与垂直值相关联。这些标准方法是用昆士兰站点的测试数据来讨论的。相关性的不一致性用于表明设计应考虑可能发生的解释的广泛可变性,cv与指数检验的相关性不应用于详细设计。此外,从里程表测试中获得的cv值不能很好地预测固结时间。这也可能是由于样品的大小不足以满足土壤结构。来自建筑工地的监测数据用于评估耗散和实验室测试的“适度”保守设计值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of the coefficient of consolidation with Queensland data
Established relationships between the coefficient of consolidation (cv) and index tests are used during both preliminary design and as a cross check during detailed design. The laboratory oedometer test provides compressibility parameters and a lower bound of cv, while the coefficients of consolidation are preferred from the field dissipation tests. However, cv is dependent on the method used to determine its value, stress level, and over-consolidation ratio. In practice, the coefficient of consolidation values obtained from dissipation tests are used to predict settlement time, while oedometer tests are useful in obtaining the parameter required to predict the magnitude of settlement. However, dissipation tests measure the horizontal coefficient of consolidation (ch) which needs to be related back to the vertical value. These standard approaches are discussed using test data from Queensland sites. Inconsistencies in correlations are used to show that design should consider the wide variability in interpretations that can occur, and correlations of cv with index tests should not be used in detailed design. Additionally, the cv values obtained from oedometer testing is a poor predictor of time for consolidation. This could also be due to the size of samples being not large enough for the soil structure. Monitoring data from construction sites are used to assess a “moderately” conservative design value from dissipation and lab tests.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Geomechanics Journal
Australian Geomechanics Journal ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
Can the shrink-swell index be predicted in the Wagga Wagga region based on Atterberg limits? The Queensland geotechnical database Simplified excavation-induced lateral displacement assessment in Sydney area Australian Geomechanics – State of the Journal Assessing the geometry of defect waviness from borehole data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1