黑色浅滩:近海形成的黑人和本土研究

IF 0.5 Q4 ETHNIC STUDIES BLACK SCHOLAR Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/00064246.2022.2007441
M. Kennedy
{"title":"黑色浅滩:近海形成的黑人和本土研究","authors":"M. Kennedy","doi":"10.1080/00064246.2022.2007441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A multivocal, wide-ranging, inter-disciplinary project, Tiffany Lethabo King’s The Black Shoals is a conversation that entwines the traditions and discourse of Black abolition and Native decolonization, confronting the genocide and dispossession endemic to European epistemologies and ontologies that continue to subtend academic study writ large and every facet of the West’s socio-economic infrastructure. Both a methodology and a metaphorical neologism playing off of the polysemic nature of the word, the shoal for King, “interrupts and slows themomentum of long-standing...modes and itineraries for theorizing New World violence, social relations, Indigeneity, and Blackness in the Western hemisphere” (2). The shoal acts as a verb and a noun to obstruct the inertia of European epistemology (noun) and reroute (verb) the flows of thought (posthumanism, new materialism, neo-Marxism) currently having a moment across academia and “the studies” (Black studies, queer studies, disability studies, women’s and gender studies). Geologically, the shoal is defined as a naturally forming and partially submerged sandbar near the shores of any other body of water. It is, as King describes, “an accumulation of granular materials (sand, rock, and other materials) that through sedimentation create a... barrier that is difficult to pass” (2). It has also historically been understood, dating back to the eighteenth century, as a verb to “describe how a ship or vessel slows down to navigate a rocky or rough seabed” (3). King’s thesis is that Black and Indigenous thought function as the shoals to “disrupt the movement of modern thought” (11) premised on Enlightenment ideology. She argues that the Western intellectual tradition was constituted by and constitutive of slavery and genocide, and in order to “enable something else to form” (11), that is, divergent ways of being, moving, and speaking that make visible European theory and grammar’s disavowal of its genocidal origin, a transversal re-engagement with Black and Indigenous thought is necessary. In particular, she places Black and Indigenous literary traditions next to each other, noting where novel, disruptive discursive spaces open up—spaces that not only interrupt but reinvent the mytho-poetics of the Enlightenment. Across an introduction, five chapters, and an epilogue, King puts the works of Sylvia Wynter, Frank Wilderson, C. L. R. James, Leslie Silko, and many others into conversation to argue that “conquistador humanism”—the name King gives to the system of thought coming out of Christopher Columbus’ massacre of Indigenous peoples and the inception of the Transatlantic Slave Trade—established the “white, European male” as the human par excellence and all remaining bodies as “Other” and “animalistic.” Such conceptions of the human still influence contemporary modes of thinking, to the detriment of both Black studies and","PeriodicalId":45369,"journal":{"name":"BLACK SCHOLAR","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Black Shoals: Offshore Formations of Black and Native Studies\",\"authors\":\"M. Kennedy\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00064246.2022.2007441\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A multivocal, wide-ranging, inter-disciplinary project, Tiffany Lethabo King’s The Black Shoals is a conversation that entwines the traditions and discourse of Black abolition and Native decolonization, confronting the genocide and dispossession endemic to European epistemologies and ontologies that continue to subtend academic study writ large and every facet of the West’s socio-economic infrastructure. Both a methodology and a metaphorical neologism playing off of the polysemic nature of the word, the shoal for King, “interrupts and slows themomentum of long-standing...modes and itineraries for theorizing New World violence, social relations, Indigeneity, and Blackness in the Western hemisphere” (2). The shoal acts as a verb and a noun to obstruct the inertia of European epistemology (noun) and reroute (verb) the flows of thought (posthumanism, new materialism, neo-Marxism) currently having a moment across academia and “the studies” (Black studies, queer studies, disability studies, women’s and gender studies). Geologically, the shoal is defined as a naturally forming and partially submerged sandbar near the shores of any other body of water. It is, as King describes, “an accumulation of granular materials (sand, rock, and other materials) that through sedimentation create a... barrier that is difficult to pass” (2). It has also historically been understood, dating back to the eighteenth century, as a verb to “describe how a ship or vessel slows down to navigate a rocky or rough seabed” (3). King’s thesis is that Black and Indigenous thought function as the shoals to “disrupt the movement of modern thought” (11) premised on Enlightenment ideology. She argues that the Western intellectual tradition was constituted by and constitutive of slavery and genocide, and in order to “enable something else to form” (11), that is, divergent ways of being, moving, and speaking that make visible European theory and grammar’s disavowal of its genocidal origin, a transversal re-engagement with Black and Indigenous thought is necessary. In particular, she places Black and Indigenous literary traditions next to each other, noting where novel, disruptive discursive spaces open up—spaces that not only interrupt but reinvent the mytho-poetics of the Enlightenment. Across an introduction, five chapters, and an epilogue, King puts the works of Sylvia Wynter, Frank Wilderson, C. L. R. James, Leslie Silko, and many others into conversation to argue that “conquistador humanism”—the name King gives to the system of thought coming out of Christopher Columbus’ massacre of Indigenous peoples and the inception of the Transatlantic Slave Trade—established the “white, European male” as the human par excellence and all remaining bodies as “Other” and “animalistic.” Such conceptions of the human still influence contemporary modes of thinking, to the detriment of both Black studies and\",\"PeriodicalId\":45369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BLACK SCHOLAR\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BLACK SCHOLAR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00064246.2022.2007441\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHNIC STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BLACK SCHOLAR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00064246.2022.2007441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

蒂芬妮·莱塔博·金的《黑浅滩》是一个多声音、广泛、跨学科的项目,是一场将废除黑人和原住民非殖民化的传统和话语交织在一起的对话,面对欧洲认识论和本体论特有的种族灭绝和剥夺,这些认识论和个体论继续在西方社会经济基础设施的各个方面进行学术研究。一种方法论和隐喻性新词都利用了“国王的浅滩”一词的多义性,“打断并减缓了长期以来……新世界暴力、社会关系、愤怒和西半球黑人理论化的模式和路线”(2)。浅滩作为一个动词和一个名词,阻碍了欧洲认识论(名词)的惯性,并改变了(动词)目前在学术界和“研究”(黑人研究、酷儿研究、残疾研究、妇女和性别研究)中流行的思想流(后人道主义、新唯物主义、新马克思主义)。从地质学上讲,该浅滩是指在任何其他水体的海岸附近自然形成并部分淹没的沙洲。正如金所描述的,它是“颗粒物质(沙子、岩石和其他物质)的堆积,通过沉积形成了一道难以通过的屏障”(2)。历史上,它也被理解为一个动词,可以追溯到18世纪,用来“描述船只如何在岩石或粗糙的海床上减速航行”(3)。金的论点是,黑人和土著思想充当了以启蒙思想为前提的“扰乱现代思想运动”(11)的浅滩。她认为,西方的知识传统是由奴隶制和种族灭绝构成的,为了“使其他东西形成”(11),即不同的存在、行动和说话方式,使欧洲理论和语法对其种族灭绝起源的否认显而易见,有必要与黑人和土著思想进行横向的重新接触。特别是,她将黑人和土著文学传统放在一起,指出了小说、颠覆性的话语空间在哪里打开——这些空间不仅打断了启蒙运动的神话诗学,而且重塑了启蒙运动。金在引言、五章和结语中介绍了西尔维娅·温特、弗兰克·维尔德森、C.L.R.James、莱斯利·西尔科、,以及许多其他人在谈话中辩称,“征服者人道主义”——金对克里斯托弗·哥伦布屠杀土著人民和跨大西洋奴隶贸易开始后产生的思想体系的称呼——将“欧洲白人男性”确立为人类的卓越,将所有剩余的身体都确立为“其他”和“兽性”。“这种人的概念仍然影响着当代的思维模式,这对黑人研究和
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Black Shoals: Offshore Formations of Black and Native Studies
A multivocal, wide-ranging, inter-disciplinary project, Tiffany Lethabo King’s The Black Shoals is a conversation that entwines the traditions and discourse of Black abolition and Native decolonization, confronting the genocide and dispossession endemic to European epistemologies and ontologies that continue to subtend academic study writ large and every facet of the West’s socio-economic infrastructure. Both a methodology and a metaphorical neologism playing off of the polysemic nature of the word, the shoal for King, “interrupts and slows themomentum of long-standing...modes and itineraries for theorizing New World violence, social relations, Indigeneity, and Blackness in the Western hemisphere” (2). The shoal acts as a verb and a noun to obstruct the inertia of European epistemology (noun) and reroute (verb) the flows of thought (posthumanism, new materialism, neo-Marxism) currently having a moment across academia and “the studies” (Black studies, queer studies, disability studies, women’s and gender studies). Geologically, the shoal is defined as a naturally forming and partially submerged sandbar near the shores of any other body of water. It is, as King describes, “an accumulation of granular materials (sand, rock, and other materials) that through sedimentation create a... barrier that is difficult to pass” (2). It has also historically been understood, dating back to the eighteenth century, as a verb to “describe how a ship or vessel slows down to navigate a rocky or rough seabed” (3). King’s thesis is that Black and Indigenous thought function as the shoals to “disrupt the movement of modern thought” (11) premised on Enlightenment ideology. She argues that the Western intellectual tradition was constituted by and constitutive of slavery and genocide, and in order to “enable something else to form” (11), that is, divergent ways of being, moving, and speaking that make visible European theory and grammar’s disavowal of its genocidal origin, a transversal re-engagement with Black and Indigenous thought is necessary. In particular, she places Black and Indigenous literary traditions next to each other, noting where novel, disruptive discursive spaces open up—spaces that not only interrupt but reinvent the mytho-poetics of the Enlightenment. Across an introduction, five chapters, and an epilogue, King puts the works of Sylvia Wynter, Frank Wilderson, C. L. R. James, Leslie Silko, and many others into conversation to argue that “conquistador humanism”—the name King gives to the system of thought coming out of Christopher Columbus’ massacre of Indigenous peoples and the inception of the Transatlantic Slave Trade—established the “white, European male” as the human par excellence and all remaining bodies as “Other” and “animalistic.” Such conceptions of the human still influence contemporary modes of thinking, to the detriment of both Black studies and
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BLACK SCHOLAR
BLACK SCHOLAR ETHNIC STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Founded in 1969 and hailed by The New York Times as "a journal in which the writings of many of today"s finest black thinkers may be viewed," THE BLACK SCHOLAR has firmly established itself as the leading journal of black cultural and political thought in the United States. In its pages African American studies intellectuals, community activists, and national and international political leaders come to grips with basic issues confronting black America and Africa.
期刊最新文献
How to Go Mad Without Losing Your Mind: Madness and Black Radical Creativity Black Muslims and the Angels of Afrofuturism Envisioning Africana Futures in 2045 Knotting the Note to the Tone On Demon Time
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1