ACCESS‐S2中南半球多周热带气旋预测:保持操作技巧和服务连续性

IF 3 3区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society Pub Date : 2023-08-21 DOI:10.1002/qj.4563
J. Camp, P. Gregory, A. Marshall, J. Greenslade, M. Wheeler
{"title":"ACCESS‐S2中南半球多周热带气旋预测:保持操作技巧和服务连续性","authors":"J. Camp, P. Gregory, A. Marshall, J. Greenslade, M. Wheeler","doi":"10.1002/qj.4563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The skill of subseasonal (multi‐week) forecasts of tropical cyclone (TC) occurrence over the Southern Hemisphere is examined in the Australian Bureau of Meteorology's (BoM) multi‐week to seasonal prediction system, ACCESS‐S2. Relative to its predecessor, ACCESS‐S1, ACCESS‐S2 shows improved biases in spatial TC frequency in the South Pacific and southwest Indian Ocean. However, there is no improvement to the known negative bias in TC frequency off the coast of NW Australia. The ability of ACCESS‐S2 to provide probabilistic forecasts of TC occurrence for the Southern Hemisphere on multi‐week timescales is examined using reliability measures and Brier Skill scores. For the period November–February 1990–2012, both ACCESS‐S1 and ACCESS‐S2 show positive skill relative to climatology for calibrated forecasts out to week 5. However, the skill of ACCESS‐S2 is slightly reduced compared to ACCESS‐S1 at all lead times, which may be due to the fewer number of ensemble members available. For the full ACCESS‐S2 hindcast period, November–April 1981–2018, ACCESS‐S2 again shows positive skill of calibrated forecasts over climatology out to week 5. For weeks 1–2, skill is reduced compared to the shorter 1990–2012 period; whereas it is marginally improved for longer lead times (weeks 3–5). Use of lagged ensembles, an alternative linear regression calibration, as well as removing weaker model TCs were examined to potentially improve the skill of ACCESS‐S2 forecasts; however, none of these methods were able to significantly increase skill at all lead times. Continued use of the original calibration method is therefore recommended in order to retain skill and continuity of service of the BoM operational and public multi‐week TC forecasts.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":49646,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi‐week tropical cyclone prediction for the Southern Hemisphere in ACCESS‐S2: maintaining operational skill and continuity of service\",\"authors\":\"J. Camp, P. Gregory, A. Marshall, J. Greenslade, M. Wheeler\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/qj.4563\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The skill of subseasonal (multi‐week) forecasts of tropical cyclone (TC) occurrence over the Southern Hemisphere is examined in the Australian Bureau of Meteorology's (BoM) multi‐week to seasonal prediction system, ACCESS‐S2. Relative to its predecessor, ACCESS‐S1, ACCESS‐S2 shows improved biases in spatial TC frequency in the South Pacific and southwest Indian Ocean. However, there is no improvement to the known negative bias in TC frequency off the coast of NW Australia. The ability of ACCESS‐S2 to provide probabilistic forecasts of TC occurrence for the Southern Hemisphere on multi‐week timescales is examined using reliability measures and Brier Skill scores. For the period November–February 1990–2012, both ACCESS‐S1 and ACCESS‐S2 show positive skill relative to climatology for calibrated forecasts out to week 5. However, the skill of ACCESS‐S2 is slightly reduced compared to ACCESS‐S1 at all lead times, which may be due to the fewer number of ensemble members available. For the full ACCESS‐S2 hindcast period, November–April 1981–2018, ACCESS‐S2 again shows positive skill of calibrated forecasts over climatology out to week 5. For weeks 1–2, skill is reduced compared to the shorter 1990–2012 period; whereas it is marginally improved for longer lead times (weeks 3–5). Use of lagged ensembles, an alternative linear regression calibration, as well as removing weaker model TCs were examined to potentially improve the skill of ACCESS‐S2 forecasts; however, none of these methods were able to significantly increase skill at all lead times. Continued use of the original calibration method is therefore recommended in order to retain skill and continuity of service of the BoM operational and public multi‐week TC forecasts.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4563\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4563","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在澳大利亚气象局(BoM)的多周到季节预报系统ACCESS‐S2中,对南半球热带气旋(TC)发生的亚季节(多周)预报技术进行了检验。与之前的ACCESS‐S1相比,ACCESS‐S2在南太平洋和西南印度洋的空间TC频率偏差有所改善。然而,在澳大利亚西北海岸外,已知的TC频率负偏置没有改善。ACCESS‐S2在多周时间尺度上提供南半球TC发生概率预测的能力通过可靠性测量和Brier技能分数进行了检验。在1990年11月至2012年2月期间,ACCESS‐S1和ACCESS‐S2在第5周的校准预报中显示出与气气学相关的正技能。然而,与ACCESS‐S1相比,ACCESS‐S2的技能在所有提前期都略有下降,这可能是由于可用的团队成员数量较少。对于1981-2018年11月至4月的整个ACCESS‐S2预测期,ACCESS‐S2再次显示出对第5周气候的校准预测的积极技能。与较短的1990-2012年相比,1-2周的技能水平有所下降;然而,如果交货期较长(3-5周),则略有改善。使用滞后集合,替代线性回归校准,以及去除较弱的模型tc进行了检查,以潜在地提高ACCESS‐S2预测的技能;然而,这些方法都不能在所有的交货期显著提高技能。因此,建议继续使用原来的校准方法,以保持BoM操作和公众多周温度预测服务的技能和连续性。这篇文章受版权保护。版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multi‐week tropical cyclone prediction for the Southern Hemisphere in ACCESS‐S2: maintaining operational skill and continuity of service
The skill of subseasonal (multi‐week) forecasts of tropical cyclone (TC) occurrence over the Southern Hemisphere is examined in the Australian Bureau of Meteorology's (BoM) multi‐week to seasonal prediction system, ACCESS‐S2. Relative to its predecessor, ACCESS‐S1, ACCESS‐S2 shows improved biases in spatial TC frequency in the South Pacific and southwest Indian Ocean. However, there is no improvement to the known negative bias in TC frequency off the coast of NW Australia. The ability of ACCESS‐S2 to provide probabilistic forecasts of TC occurrence for the Southern Hemisphere on multi‐week timescales is examined using reliability measures and Brier Skill scores. For the period November–February 1990–2012, both ACCESS‐S1 and ACCESS‐S2 show positive skill relative to climatology for calibrated forecasts out to week 5. However, the skill of ACCESS‐S2 is slightly reduced compared to ACCESS‐S1 at all lead times, which may be due to the fewer number of ensemble members available. For the full ACCESS‐S2 hindcast period, November–April 1981–2018, ACCESS‐S2 again shows positive skill of calibrated forecasts over climatology out to week 5. For weeks 1–2, skill is reduced compared to the shorter 1990–2012 period; whereas it is marginally improved for longer lead times (weeks 3–5). Use of lagged ensembles, an alternative linear regression calibration, as well as removing weaker model TCs were examined to potentially improve the skill of ACCESS‐S2 forecasts; however, none of these methods were able to significantly increase skill at all lead times. Continued use of the original calibration method is therefore recommended in order to retain skill and continuity of service of the BoM operational and public multi‐week TC forecasts.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.80
自引率
4.50%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society is a journal published by the Royal Meteorological Society. It aims to communicate and document new research in the atmospheric sciences and related fields. The journal is considered one of the leading publications in meteorology worldwide. It accepts articles, comprehensive review articles, and comments on published papers. It is published eight times a year, with additional special issues. The Quarterly Journal has a wide readership of scientists in the atmospheric and related fields. It is indexed and abstracted in various databases, including Advanced Polymers Abstracts, Agricultural Engineering Abstracts, CAB Abstracts, CABDirect, COMPENDEX, CSA Civil Engineering Abstracts, Earthquake Engineering Abstracts, Engineered Materials Abstracts, Science Citation Index, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and more.
期刊最新文献
Multivariate post‐processing of probabilistic sub‐seasonal weather regime forecasts Relationship between vertical variation of cloud microphysical properties and thickness of the entrainment interfacial layer in Physics of Stratocumulus Top stratocumulus clouds Characteristics and trends of Atlantic tropical cyclones that do and do not develop from African easterly waves Teleconnection and the Antarctic response to the Indian Ocean Dipole in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models First trial for the assimilation of radiance data from MTVZA‐GY on board the new Russian satellite meteor‐M N2‐2 in the CMA‐GFS 4D‐VAR system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1