单头或双头胶囊用于调查疑似小肠出血:两个头比一个好吗

E. McCarthy, S. Sihag, C. Deane, C. Walker, S. Semenov, B. Ryan, N. Breslin, A. O’Connor, S. O’Donnell, D. McNamara
{"title":"单头或双头胶囊用于调查疑似小肠出血:两个头比一个好吗","authors":"E. McCarthy, S. Sihag, C. Deane, C. Walker, S. Semenov, B. Ryan, N. Breslin, A. O’Connor, S. O’Donnell, D. McNamara","doi":"10.3389/fgstr.2022.1071797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Capsule endoscopy is now the accepted first line investigation for suspected small bowel (SB) bleeding. Recent evidence suggests the diagnostic yield for SB pathology may be higher for tailored double headed (DH) SB capsules. Whether other forms of bidirectional capsules offer a similar advantage is less clear. Aim To compare the efficacy of single headed versus bidirectional capsules in detecting pathology in patients with suspected small bowel bleeding. Methods A single centre prospective comparison study was conducted over an 8 month period in a tertiary care hospital. Patients referred with overt or suspected SB bleeding were assigned to either SB3 Medtronic SB capsule (SH) during the initial four months or PillCam Colon 2 Medtronic capsule (DH) during the subsequent four months. Studies were analysed by trained Capsule Endoscopists and approved by our institutions capsule review board. Findings were compared between SH and DH capsules using a chi2 or t-test as appropriate. A p value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results 201 subjects were included, mean age 61.8 years, 90 (45%) male. Majority referred with occult bleeding, 153 (76%). DH and SH capsule used in 100 and 101 cases, respectively. 90% (n=181) capsules were complete and overall diagnostic yield was 57% (n=114). Diagnostic yield was similar between both groups - DH 53% (n=53), SH 60% (n=61). Positive finding in overt bleeding; SH 85% (n=22) versus DH 50% (n=11), p<0.02. SH capsules more frequently detected SB inflammation, 27 (27%) versus 9 (9%), p<0.002. More patients had another diagnosis in the DH (19) than the SH (9), p<0.04, the majority were type 1a vascular lesions, “red spots” or diminutive colonic polyps. Conclusion Single head and double head capsules perform similary in terms of diagnostic yield overall. This supports the continued use of standard small bowel capsules for investigation of the small bowel.","PeriodicalId":73085,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single or double headed capsules for the investigation of suspected small bowel bleeding: Are two heads better than one\",\"authors\":\"E. McCarthy, S. Sihag, C. Deane, C. Walker, S. Semenov, B. Ryan, N. Breslin, A. O’Connor, S. O’Donnell, D. McNamara\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fgstr.2022.1071797\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Capsule endoscopy is now the accepted first line investigation for suspected small bowel (SB) bleeding. Recent evidence suggests the diagnostic yield for SB pathology may be higher for tailored double headed (DH) SB capsules. Whether other forms of bidirectional capsules offer a similar advantage is less clear. Aim To compare the efficacy of single headed versus bidirectional capsules in detecting pathology in patients with suspected small bowel bleeding. Methods A single centre prospective comparison study was conducted over an 8 month period in a tertiary care hospital. Patients referred with overt or suspected SB bleeding were assigned to either SB3 Medtronic SB capsule (SH) during the initial four months or PillCam Colon 2 Medtronic capsule (DH) during the subsequent four months. Studies were analysed by trained Capsule Endoscopists and approved by our institutions capsule review board. Findings were compared between SH and DH capsules using a chi2 or t-test as appropriate. A p value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results 201 subjects were included, mean age 61.8 years, 90 (45%) male. Majority referred with occult bleeding, 153 (76%). DH and SH capsule used in 100 and 101 cases, respectively. 90% (n=181) capsules were complete and overall diagnostic yield was 57% (n=114). Diagnostic yield was similar between both groups - DH 53% (n=53), SH 60% (n=61). Positive finding in overt bleeding; SH 85% (n=22) versus DH 50% (n=11), p<0.02. SH capsules more frequently detected SB inflammation, 27 (27%) versus 9 (9%), p<0.002. More patients had another diagnosis in the DH (19) than the SH (9), p<0.04, the majority were type 1a vascular lesions, “red spots” or diminutive colonic polyps. Conclusion Single head and double head capsules perform similary in terms of diagnostic yield overall. This supports the continued use of standard small bowel capsules for investigation of the small bowel.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73085,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgstr.2022.1071797\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgstr.2022.1071797","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景胶囊内窥镜检查是目前公认的疑似小肠出血的一线调查。最近的证据表明,定制的双头(DH)SB胶囊对SB病理的诊断率可能更高。其他形式的双向胶囊是否具有类似的优势尚不清楚。目的比较单头胶囊和双向胶囊在可疑小肠出血患者中检测病理的疗效。方法在一家三级护理医院进行为期8个月的单中心前瞻性比较研究。转诊为明显或疑似SB出血的患者在最初四个月内被分配到SB3美敦力SB胶囊(SH),或在随后四个月分配到PillCam Colon 2美敦力胶囊(DH)。研究由经过培训的胶囊内窥镜医生进行分析,并经我们机构的胶囊审查委员会批准。使用chi2或t检验(视情况而定)比较SH和DH胶囊之间的结果。p值<0.05被认为是显著的。结果201例受试者,平均年龄61.8岁,男性90例(45%)。多数为隐匿性出血,153例(76%)。DH和SH胶囊分别用于100例和101例。90%(n=181)的胶囊是完整的,总诊断率为57%(n=114)。两组的诊断率相似——DH 53%(n=53),SH 60%(n=61)。明显出血的阳性发现;SH 85%(n=22)与DH 50%(n=11),p<0.02。SH胶囊更频繁地检测到SB炎症,分别为27(27%)和9(9%),p<0.002。DH(19)中有其他诊断的患者比SH(9)中有更多,p<0.04,大多数是1a型血管病变、“红点”或小型结肠息肉。结论单头胶囊和双头胶囊在总的诊断率方面具有相似性。这支持继续使用标准小肠胶囊进行小肠研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Single or double headed capsules for the investigation of suspected small bowel bleeding: Are two heads better than one
Background Capsule endoscopy is now the accepted first line investigation for suspected small bowel (SB) bleeding. Recent evidence suggests the diagnostic yield for SB pathology may be higher for tailored double headed (DH) SB capsules. Whether other forms of bidirectional capsules offer a similar advantage is less clear. Aim To compare the efficacy of single headed versus bidirectional capsules in detecting pathology in patients with suspected small bowel bleeding. Methods A single centre prospective comparison study was conducted over an 8 month period in a tertiary care hospital. Patients referred with overt or suspected SB bleeding were assigned to either SB3 Medtronic SB capsule (SH) during the initial four months or PillCam Colon 2 Medtronic capsule (DH) during the subsequent four months. Studies were analysed by trained Capsule Endoscopists and approved by our institutions capsule review board. Findings were compared between SH and DH capsules using a chi2 or t-test as appropriate. A p value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results 201 subjects were included, mean age 61.8 years, 90 (45%) male. Majority referred with occult bleeding, 153 (76%). DH and SH capsule used in 100 and 101 cases, respectively. 90% (n=181) capsules were complete and overall diagnostic yield was 57% (n=114). Diagnostic yield was similar between both groups - DH 53% (n=53), SH 60% (n=61). Positive finding in overt bleeding; SH 85% (n=22) versus DH 50% (n=11), p<0.02. SH capsules more frequently detected SB inflammation, 27 (27%) versus 9 (9%), p<0.002. More patients had another diagnosis in the DH (19) than the SH (9), p<0.04, the majority were type 1a vascular lesions, “red spots” or diminutive colonic polyps. Conclusion Single head and double head capsules perform similary in terms of diagnostic yield overall. This supports the continued use of standard small bowel capsules for investigation of the small bowel.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Current status and clinical applications of tissue engineering of the gastrointestinal tract: a systematized narrative review Fecal microbiota transplantation—could stool donors’ and receptors’ diet be the key to future success? X-ray phase-contrast 3D virtual histology characterises complex tissue architecture in colorectal cancer Adalimumab biosimilar ABP 501 is equally effective and safe in long-term management of inflammatory bowel diseases patients when used as first biologic treatment or as replace of the ADA originator for a non-medical reason A blood-based transcriptomic signature stratifies severe Crohn’s disease and defines potentially targetable therapeutic pathways
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1