介绍

Giuseppe Franco, A. Habisch
{"title":"介绍","authors":"Giuseppe Franco, A. Habisch","doi":"10.2478/jome-2018-0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The published, public book or paper is no longer the only material of interest to historians of science and medicine. Correspondence, diaries, laboratory notebooks, clinical records and a range of other sources are now appreciated as providing valuable insights into the production, dissemination and use of scientific and medical knowledge. Several large correspondence projects testify to the place that letters occupy in contemporary historical thinking. For the Victorian era, the correspondences of Charles Darwin and Michael Faraday are the most visible examples, and those of Henry Oldenburg and Isaac Newton have illuminated the period of the early Royal Society. Victorians used letters like we use the telephone and emails: to communicate whenever they needed to. The postal service was more efficient then, with several deliveries each day, and after the railways were in full swing, often a speedier transport between cities. Consequently, individuals wrote notes and letters to communicate mundane matters, like luncheon times, greetings to the family, or the possibility of meeting. Victorians also used the postal service to talk about more serious matters, such as the books they were writing, politics, or what decisions they ought to take about substantial issues. Darwin is a particularly good example of the enabling function of a decent postal system, since he rarely left Down House and used his extensive network of correspondents as a lifeline to the wider scientific world. Thomas Henry Huxley and Michael Foster also participated in this epistolary way of life, and the correspondence reproduced here records their friendship lasting more than three decades. Despite a few obvious gaps, the surviving correspondence has a wonderful dynamic, as the two colleagues age and mature, their interests change and their relationship develops. Read straight through, the letters offer a window into the Victorian values of two major life scientists of the period.","PeriodicalId":74144,"journal":{"name":"Medical history. Supplement","volume":"1 1","pages":"xi - xix"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction\",\"authors\":\"Giuseppe Franco, A. Habisch\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/jome-2018-0020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The published, public book or paper is no longer the only material of interest to historians of science and medicine. Correspondence, diaries, laboratory notebooks, clinical records and a range of other sources are now appreciated as providing valuable insights into the production, dissemination and use of scientific and medical knowledge. Several large correspondence projects testify to the place that letters occupy in contemporary historical thinking. For the Victorian era, the correspondences of Charles Darwin and Michael Faraday are the most visible examples, and those of Henry Oldenburg and Isaac Newton have illuminated the period of the early Royal Society. Victorians used letters like we use the telephone and emails: to communicate whenever they needed to. The postal service was more efficient then, with several deliveries each day, and after the railways were in full swing, often a speedier transport between cities. Consequently, individuals wrote notes and letters to communicate mundane matters, like luncheon times, greetings to the family, or the possibility of meeting. Victorians also used the postal service to talk about more serious matters, such as the books they were writing, politics, or what decisions they ought to take about substantial issues. Darwin is a particularly good example of the enabling function of a decent postal system, since he rarely left Down House and used his extensive network of correspondents as a lifeline to the wider scientific world. Thomas Henry Huxley and Michael Foster also participated in this epistolary way of life, and the correspondence reproduced here records their friendship lasting more than three decades. Despite a few obvious gaps, the surviving correspondence has a wonderful dynamic, as the two colleagues age and mature, their interests change and their relationship develops. Read straight through, the letters offer a window into the Victorian values of two major life scientists of the period.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74144,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical history. Supplement\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"xi - xix\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical history. Supplement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/jome-2018-0020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical history. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jome-2018-0020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

出版的、公开的书籍或论文不再是科学和医学历史学家感兴趣的唯一材料。信函、日记、实验室笔记、临床记录和一系列其他来源现在被认为对科学和医学知识的生产、传播和使用提供了宝贵的见解。几个大型通信项目证明了信件在当代历史思想中所占的地位。在维多利亚时代,查尔斯·达尔文和迈克尔·法拉第的通信是最明显的例子,亨利·奥尔登堡和艾萨克·牛顿的通信照亮了早期皇家学会的时代。维多利亚时代的人使用信件,就像我们使用电话和电子邮件一样,在需要的时候进行交流。当时的邮政服务效率更高,每天都有几次投递,而在铁路全面发展之后,城市之间的运输通常更快。因此,人们写便条和信件来交流日常事务,如午餐时间,问候家人,或会面的可能性。维多利亚时代的人还利用邮政服务来谈论更严肃的事情,比如他们正在写的书、政治,或者他们应该对重大问题做出什么决定。达尔文是一个特别好的例子,说明了一个体面的邮政系统的推动作用,因为他很少离开唐斯,把他广泛的通讯员网络作为与更广泛的科学世界联系的生命线。托马斯·亨利·赫胥黎和迈克尔·福斯特也参与了这种书信式的生活方式,这里复制的信件记录了他们长达三十多年的友谊。尽管有一些明显的差距,但幸存下来的通信有一种奇妙的动态,随着两位同事年龄的增长和成熟,他们的兴趣改变了,他们的关系发展了。通读这些信件,你就能了解维多利亚时代两位重要生命科学家的价值观。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Introduction
The published, public book or paper is no longer the only material of interest to historians of science and medicine. Correspondence, diaries, laboratory notebooks, clinical records and a range of other sources are now appreciated as providing valuable insights into the production, dissemination and use of scientific and medical knowledge. Several large correspondence projects testify to the place that letters occupy in contemporary historical thinking. For the Victorian era, the correspondences of Charles Darwin and Michael Faraday are the most visible examples, and those of Henry Oldenburg and Isaac Newton have illuminated the period of the early Royal Society. Victorians used letters like we use the telephone and emails: to communicate whenever they needed to. The postal service was more efficient then, with several deliveries each day, and after the railways were in full swing, often a speedier transport between cities. Consequently, individuals wrote notes and letters to communicate mundane matters, like luncheon times, greetings to the family, or the possibility of meeting. Victorians also used the postal service to talk about more serious matters, such as the books they were writing, politics, or what decisions they ought to take about substantial issues. Darwin is a particularly good example of the enabling function of a decent postal system, since he rarely left Down House and used his extensive network of correspondents as a lifeline to the wider scientific world. Thomas Henry Huxley and Michael Foster also participated in this epistolary way of life, and the correspondence reproduced here records their friendship lasting more than three decades. Despite a few obvious gaps, the surviving correspondence has a wonderful dynamic, as the two colleagues age and mature, their interests change and their relationship develops. Read straight through, the letters offer a window into the Victorian values of two major life scientists of the period.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preface Appendix II 3. Bibliography Appendix B Appendix V
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1