测量自闭症成年人的生活质量:世界卫生组织生活质量量表简本的可靠性和有效性

David Mason, J. Rodgers, Deborah Garland, Colin Wilson, J. Parr, H. McConachie
{"title":"测量自闭症成年人的生活质量:世界卫生组织生活质量量表简本的可靠性和有效性","authors":"David Mason, J. Rodgers, Deborah Garland, Colin Wilson, J. Parr, H. McConachie","doi":"10.12688/amrcopenres.13030.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Measurement of the Quality of Life (QoL) of autistic adults is receiving increasing empirical attention. The World Health Organisation (WHO) QoL measure (WHOQoL-BREF) has been utilised in several studies. Autistic adults report significantly lower QoL compared to neurotypical adults across several domains. However, no studies have investigated the suitability of WHOQoL-BREF as a tool to measure the QoL of autistic adults. Methods: This study explored the validity and reliability of WHOQoL-BREF with a mixed methods approach. Quantitatively, structural validity was explored by an exploratory factor analysis of WHOQoL-BREF data from 352 autistic adults aged 18-80 years. Qualitatively, four discussion groups (n=20 autistic people) were conducted to explore the face validity of the items of WHOQoL-BREF. Results: The five factor structure was conceptually similar to the WHO formulation of QoL, with adequate to good internal consistency of domains; however, some items loaded in an unexpected way. The reasons for these unexpected loadings were explored in the transcripts from the discussion groups. Conclusions: The findings suggest that the WHOQoL-BREF has acceptable validity and reliability for use with autistic adults; however caution is needed when interpreting data from the social domain and some other items","PeriodicalId":72183,"journal":{"name":"AMRC open research","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring quality of life in autistic adults: the reliability and validity of the Brief Version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life scale\",\"authors\":\"David Mason, J. Rodgers, Deborah Garland, Colin Wilson, J. Parr, H. McConachie\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/amrcopenres.13030.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Measurement of the Quality of Life (QoL) of autistic adults is receiving increasing empirical attention. The World Health Organisation (WHO) QoL measure (WHOQoL-BREF) has been utilised in several studies. Autistic adults report significantly lower QoL compared to neurotypical adults across several domains. However, no studies have investigated the suitability of WHOQoL-BREF as a tool to measure the QoL of autistic adults. Methods: This study explored the validity and reliability of WHOQoL-BREF with a mixed methods approach. Quantitatively, structural validity was explored by an exploratory factor analysis of WHOQoL-BREF data from 352 autistic adults aged 18-80 years. Qualitatively, four discussion groups (n=20 autistic people) were conducted to explore the face validity of the items of WHOQoL-BREF. Results: The five factor structure was conceptually similar to the WHO formulation of QoL, with adequate to good internal consistency of domains; however, some items loaded in an unexpected way. The reasons for these unexpected loadings were explored in the transcripts from the discussion groups. Conclusions: The findings suggest that the WHOQoL-BREF has acceptable validity and reliability for use with autistic adults; however caution is needed when interpreting data from the social domain and some other items\",\"PeriodicalId\":72183,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AMRC open research\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AMRC open research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/amrcopenres.13030.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMRC open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/amrcopenres.13030.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:自闭症成年人生活质量(QoL)的测量正受到越来越多的实证关注。世界卫生组织(世界卫生组织)生活质量测量(WHOQoL-BREF)已用于多项研究。在几个领域,自闭症成年人的生活质量明显低于神经正常成年人。然而,没有研究调查WHOQoL BREF作为衡量自闭症成年人生活质量的工具的适用性。方法:采用混合方法探讨WHOQoL BREF的有效性和可靠性。从数量上讲,通过对352名18-80岁自闭症成年人的WHOQoL BREF数据进行探索性因素分析,探讨了结构有效性。定性地,我们进行了四个讨论小组(n=20名自闭症患者)来探索WHOQoL BREF项目的面孔有效性。结果:五因素结构在概念上与世界卫生组织的QoL配方相似,具有足够的内部一致性;但是,有些项目以意外的方式加载。讨论小组的记录中探讨了这些意外负载的原因。结论:研究结果表明,WHOQoL BREF对自闭症成年人的使用具有可接受的有效性和可靠性;然而,在解释来自社交领域和其他项目的数据时需要谨慎
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Measuring quality of life in autistic adults: the reliability and validity of the Brief Version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life scale
Background: Measurement of the Quality of Life (QoL) of autistic adults is receiving increasing empirical attention. The World Health Organisation (WHO) QoL measure (WHOQoL-BREF) has been utilised in several studies. Autistic adults report significantly lower QoL compared to neurotypical adults across several domains. However, no studies have investigated the suitability of WHOQoL-BREF as a tool to measure the QoL of autistic adults. Methods: This study explored the validity and reliability of WHOQoL-BREF with a mixed methods approach. Quantitatively, structural validity was explored by an exploratory factor analysis of WHOQoL-BREF data from 352 autistic adults aged 18-80 years. Qualitatively, four discussion groups (n=20 autistic people) were conducted to explore the face validity of the items of WHOQoL-BREF. Results: The five factor structure was conceptually similar to the WHO formulation of QoL, with adequate to good internal consistency of domains; however, some items loaded in an unexpected way. The reasons for these unexpected loadings were explored in the transcripts from the discussion groups. Conclusions: The findings suggest that the WHOQoL-BREF has acceptable validity and reliability for use with autistic adults; however caution is needed when interpreting data from the social domain and some other items
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Creating connections: developing an online space for cross-regional mentorship and network building in the dementia research field. Inclusion of palliative and end of life care in health strategies aimed at integrated care: a documentary analysis [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. The impact of Covid-19 pandemic on hospices: A systematic integrated review and synthesis of recommendations for policy and practice. Inclusion of palliative and end of life care in health strategies aimed at integrated care: a documentary analysis [version 2; peer review: 2 approved] The dementia research career pipeline: Gender disparities in publication authorships and grant funding outcomes at different career stages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1