民族文化和经济自由会影响银行的冒险行为吗?来自海湾合作委员会国家的证据

Tanzina Akhter, Zairihan Abdul Halim, Saima Mehzabin, A. Shahriar, M. Azad
{"title":"民族文化和经济自由会影响银行的冒险行为吗?来自海湾合作委员会国家的证据","authors":"Tanzina Akhter, Zairihan Abdul Halim, Saima Mehzabin, A. Shahriar, M. Azad","doi":"10.1108/imefm-07-2022-0283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe global financial crisis of 2008 has put greater doubt on the bank risk-management effectiveness around the world. As a part of the response to such doubt, the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) region is formulating some feasible approaches to manage bank risk. In this regard, an understanding of the role of the region’s culture and economic freedom will provide immense input into this risk management approach. This study examines the impact of national culture and economic freedom on bank risk-taking behavior.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nData on bank risk measures, culture and economic freedom are obtained from the FitchConnect, World Bank database, Hofstede’s insights and Heritage Foundation. Generalized least squares and two step-system generalized method of moments are then used to examine the risk-taking behavior of the region.\n\n\nFindings\nBanks of the GCC region operating in the low power distance, high collectivism, masculine and low uncertainty avoidance cultures are susceptible to assuming more operational and insolvency risks. Furthermore, banks’ overall risk-taking inclination is positively increased once the region has considerable business and monetary freedom.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe governments and bank regulatory bodies may benefit from the study findings by developing the best economic freedom index and national culture that enriches risk management practices and curves excessive risk-taking inclination.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first attempt to address the interplay among culture, economic freedom and bank risk to ensure constructive risk-taking behavior for the GCC banking industry.\n","PeriodicalId":47091,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do national culture and economic freedom affect bank risk-taking behavior? Evidence from GCC countries\",\"authors\":\"Tanzina Akhter, Zairihan Abdul Halim, Saima Mehzabin, A. Shahriar, M. Azad\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/imefm-07-2022-0283\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThe global financial crisis of 2008 has put greater doubt on the bank risk-management effectiveness around the world. As a part of the response to such doubt, the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) region is formulating some feasible approaches to manage bank risk. In this regard, an understanding of the role of the region’s culture and economic freedom will provide immense input into this risk management approach. This study examines the impact of national culture and economic freedom on bank risk-taking behavior.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nData on bank risk measures, culture and economic freedom are obtained from the FitchConnect, World Bank database, Hofstede’s insights and Heritage Foundation. Generalized least squares and two step-system generalized method of moments are then used to examine the risk-taking behavior of the region.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nBanks of the GCC region operating in the low power distance, high collectivism, masculine and low uncertainty avoidance cultures are susceptible to assuming more operational and insolvency risks. Furthermore, banks’ overall risk-taking inclination is positively increased once the region has considerable business and monetary freedom.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThe governments and bank regulatory bodies may benefit from the study findings by developing the best economic freedom index and national culture that enriches risk management practices and curves excessive risk-taking inclination.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first attempt to address the interplay among culture, economic freedom and bank risk to ensure constructive risk-taking behavior for the GCC banking industry.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":47091,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/imefm-07-2022-0283\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/imefm-07-2022-0283","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2008年的全球金融危机使世界各国对银行风险管理的有效性产生了更大的质疑。作为对这种疑虑的回应,海湾合作委员会(GCC)地区正在制定一些可行的方法来管理银行风险。在这方面,了解该地区的文化和经济自由的作用将为这种风险管理办法提供巨大的投入。本研究考察了国家文化和经济自由对银行风险承担行为的影响。设计/方法/方法有关银行风险措施、文化和经济自由的数据来自FitchConnect、世界银行数据库、Hofstede的见解和传统基金会。然后用广义最小二乘法和两阶系统广义矩量法来考察区域的冒险行为。在低权力距离、高度集体主义、男性化和低不确定性规避文化下运营的海湾合作委员会地区的银行容易承担更多的运营和破产风险。此外,一旦该地区拥有相当大的商业和货币自由,银行的整体冒险倾向就会积极增加。实践启示政府和银行监管机构可以从研究结果中受益,通过发展最佳经济自由指数和国家文化,丰富风险管理实践,曲线过度冒险倾向。原创性/价值据作者所知,本研究是第一次尝试解决文化、经济自由和银行风险之间的相互作用,以确保海湾合作委员会银行业的建设性冒险行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do national culture and economic freedom affect bank risk-taking behavior? Evidence from GCC countries
Purpose The global financial crisis of 2008 has put greater doubt on the bank risk-management effectiveness around the world. As a part of the response to such doubt, the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) region is formulating some feasible approaches to manage bank risk. In this regard, an understanding of the role of the region’s culture and economic freedom will provide immense input into this risk management approach. This study examines the impact of national culture and economic freedom on bank risk-taking behavior. Design/methodology/approach Data on bank risk measures, culture and economic freedom are obtained from the FitchConnect, World Bank database, Hofstede’s insights and Heritage Foundation. Generalized least squares and two step-system generalized method of moments are then used to examine the risk-taking behavior of the region. Findings Banks of the GCC region operating in the low power distance, high collectivism, masculine and low uncertainty avoidance cultures are susceptible to assuming more operational and insolvency risks. Furthermore, banks’ overall risk-taking inclination is positively increased once the region has considerable business and monetary freedom. Practical implications The governments and bank regulatory bodies may benefit from the study findings by developing the best economic freedom index and national culture that enriches risk management practices and curves excessive risk-taking inclination. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first attempt to address the interplay among culture, economic freedom and bank risk to ensure constructive risk-taking behavior for the GCC banking industry.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management (IMEFM) publishes quality and in-depth analysis on current issues within Islamic and Middle Eastern finance and management. The journal welcomes strong evidence-based empirical studies and results-focused case studies that share research in product development and clarify best practices. The title is also keen to consider work from emerging authors. IMEFM has just also accepted into Clarivate''s SSCI in 2018, and its IF will be available in summer 2019, with citations dating from 2016. The coverage includes but is not limited to: -Islamic finance: Fundamentals, trends and opportunities in Islamic Finance, Islamic banking and financial markets, Risk management, Corporate finance, Investment strategy, Islamic social finance, Financial planning, Housing finance, Legal and regulatory issues, -Islamic management: Corporate governance, Customer relationship management and service quality, Business ethics and corporate social responsibility, Management styles and strategies in Shariah environments, Labour and welfare economics, Political economy. The journal is the only title aiming to give an interdisciplinary and holistic view on Islamic finance and business management practices in order to inform these two intertwined communities.
期刊最新文献
Economic growth and sustainable development: evidence from OIC countries Economical rights versus God’s rights: criticising of the implementation Shariah economic in Indonesia Does diversity in top management and boards affect ESG performance? Evidence from Islamic and conventional banks in the MENA region The new legalities of Islamic contractual interpretation: institutional frameworks and the displacement of intention Exploring the stock market development and sustainable development nexus: insights from emerging market economies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1