{"title":"巴伦支-卡拉海冰区、乌拉尔阻塞和北大西洋涛动之间的可能联系","authors":"Ramin Ahmadi, Omid Alizadeh","doi":"10.1002/qj.4560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We investigated the possible links between the Barents‐Kara sea ice area (SIA), Ural blocking, and the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) in December‐January (DJ) and February‐March (FM) using the ERA5 data from December 1979 to March 2022. The Barents‐Kara SIA loss in December is correlated with an increase in geopotential height at 500 hPa (Z500), mean sea level pressure (MSLP), and the frequency and intensity of blocking over the Ural in DJ. The Barents‐Kara SIA loss in December is also associated with the weakening of the stratospheric polar vortex in FM (particularly in mid‐February) and the negative NAO index. However, our results show that persistent Ural blocking occurs during the transition from the neutral or positive NAO index to its negative phase. Indeed, a significant decrease in the NAO index leads to the development of the area of instantaneous blocking (IB) and positive Z500 anomalies over the Ural. Persistent Ural blocking significantly contributes to the Barents‐Kara SIA loss, with a peak decline about 7 days after the onset of Ural blocking. The onset of persistent Ural blocking also precedes the weakening of the stratospheric polar vortex by about one month. This implies that the negative correlation between the Barents‐Kara SIA loss in December and the NAO index in FM might be caused by the weakening of the stratospheric polar vortex, which itself is induced by persistent Ural blocking. We conclude that the Barents‐Kara SIA loss in December can be viewed as a sign rather than the cause of changes in atmospheric circulation over the high‐latitude North Atlantic in succeeding months because the Barents‐Kara SIA also largely responds to Ural blocking and the NAO.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":49646,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The possible links between the Barents‐Kara sea ice area, Ural blocking, and the North Atlantic Oscillation\",\"authors\":\"Ramin Ahmadi, Omid Alizadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/qj.4560\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We investigated the possible links between the Barents‐Kara sea ice area (SIA), Ural blocking, and the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) in December‐January (DJ) and February‐March (FM) using the ERA5 data from December 1979 to March 2022. The Barents‐Kara SIA loss in December is correlated with an increase in geopotential height at 500 hPa (Z500), mean sea level pressure (MSLP), and the frequency and intensity of blocking over the Ural in DJ. The Barents‐Kara SIA loss in December is also associated with the weakening of the stratospheric polar vortex in FM (particularly in mid‐February) and the negative NAO index. However, our results show that persistent Ural blocking occurs during the transition from the neutral or positive NAO index to its negative phase. Indeed, a significant decrease in the NAO index leads to the development of the area of instantaneous blocking (IB) and positive Z500 anomalies over the Ural. Persistent Ural blocking significantly contributes to the Barents‐Kara SIA loss, with a peak decline about 7 days after the onset of Ural blocking. The onset of persistent Ural blocking also precedes the weakening of the stratospheric polar vortex by about one month. This implies that the negative correlation between the Barents‐Kara SIA loss in December and the NAO index in FM might be caused by the weakening of the stratospheric polar vortex, which itself is induced by persistent Ural blocking. We conclude that the Barents‐Kara SIA loss in December can be viewed as a sign rather than the cause of changes in atmospheric circulation over the high‐latitude North Atlantic in succeeding months because the Barents‐Kara SIA also largely responds to Ural blocking and the NAO.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4560\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4560","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
The possible links between the Barents‐Kara sea ice area, Ural blocking, and the North Atlantic Oscillation
We investigated the possible links between the Barents‐Kara sea ice area (SIA), Ural blocking, and the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) in December‐January (DJ) and February‐March (FM) using the ERA5 data from December 1979 to March 2022. The Barents‐Kara SIA loss in December is correlated with an increase in geopotential height at 500 hPa (Z500), mean sea level pressure (MSLP), and the frequency and intensity of blocking over the Ural in DJ. The Barents‐Kara SIA loss in December is also associated with the weakening of the stratospheric polar vortex in FM (particularly in mid‐February) and the negative NAO index. However, our results show that persistent Ural blocking occurs during the transition from the neutral or positive NAO index to its negative phase. Indeed, a significant decrease in the NAO index leads to the development of the area of instantaneous blocking (IB) and positive Z500 anomalies over the Ural. Persistent Ural blocking significantly contributes to the Barents‐Kara SIA loss, with a peak decline about 7 days after the onset of Ural blocking. The onset of persistent Ural blocking also precedes the weakening of the stratospheric polar vortex by about one month. This implies that the negative correlation between the Barents‐Kara SIA loss in December and the NAO index in FM might be caused by the weakening of the stratospheric polar vortex, which itself is induced by persistent Ural blocking. We conclude that the Barents‐Kara SIA loss in December can be viewed as a sign rather than the cause of changes in atmospheric circulation over the high‐latitude North Atlantic in succeeding months because the Barents‐Kara SIA also largely responds to Ural blocking and the NAO.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
期刊介绍:
The Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society is a journal published by the Royal Meteorological Society. It aims to communicate and document new research in the atmospheric sciences and related fields. The journal is considered one of the leading publications in meteorology worldwide. It accepts articles, comprehensive review articles, and comments on published papers. It is published eight times a year, with additional special issues.
The Quarterly Journal has a wide readership of scientists in the atmospheric and related fields. It is indexed and abstracted in various databases, including Advanced Polymers Abstracts, Agricultural Engineering Abstracts, CAB Abstracts, CABDirect, COMPENDEX, CSA Civil Engineering Abstracts, Earthquake Engineering Abstracts, Engineered Materials Abstracts, Science Citation Index, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and more.