1980年《维也纳国际货物销售公约》在非洲的通过——批判性分析

S. Eiselen
{"title":"1980年《维也纳国际货物销售公约》在非洲的通过——批判性分析","authors":"S. Eiselen","doi":"10.25159/2522-3062/10808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The adoption of the Vienna Convention for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) 1908 in Africa has been slow in comparison to other regions of the world. The Convention is widely regarded as one of the most successful instruments of international commercial law harmonisation. It has been adopted by ninety-four countries from all regions of the world representing more than eighty per cent of international sales. Despite this, only fourteen African countries have adopted it so far. The research question in this article is why African countries have been reluctant to adopt the CISG, compared to countries from other regions around the world. The aim of the article is to establish and analyse the possible reasons why African countries have been so slow in adopting the CISG and to suggest solutions to improve the situation. The reasons include an ignorance about the Convention, apathy on the side of governments and business alike and the existence of other regional harmonisation instruments such as the Organisation for the Harmonisation of Business Law in Africa (OHADA). It is argued that the impetus for greater acceptance lies within the pressure that might emanate from regional trading blocs such as the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA), the Southern African Development Community (SADC) and the newly formed African Continental Free Trade Area Agreement (AfCFT). It is also argued that greater awareness amongst practitioners may play a future role if the new generation of lawyers are educated on the Convention.","PeriodicalId":29899,"journal":{"name":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa-CILSA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Adoption of the Vienna Convention for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) 1980 in Africa—A Critical Analysis\",\"authors\":\"S. Eiselen\",\"doi\":\"10.25159/2522-3062/10808\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The adoption of the Vienna Convention for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) 1908 in Africa has been slow in comparison to other regions of the world. The Convention is widely regarded as one of the most successful instruments of international commercial law harmonisation. It has been adopted by ninety-four countries from all regions of the world representing more than eighty per cent of international sales. Despite this, only fourteen African countries have adopted it so far. The research question in this article is why African countries have been reluctant to adopt the CISG, compared to countries from other regions around the world. The aim of the article is to establish and analyse the possible reasons why African countries have been so slow in adopting the CISG and to suggest solutions to improve the situation. The reasons include an ignorance about the Convention, apathy on the side of governments and business alike and the existence of other regional harmonisation instruments such as the Organisation for the Harmonisation of Business Law in Africa (OHADA). It is argued that the impetus for greater acceptance lies within the pressure that might emanate from regional trading blocs such as the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA), the Southern African Development Community (SADC) and the newly formed African Continental Free Trade Area Agreement (AfCFT). It is also argued that greater awareness amongst practitioners may play a future role if the new generation of lawyers are educated on the Convention.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa-CILSA\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa-CILSA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25159/2522-3062/10808\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa-CILSA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25159/2522-3062/10808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与世界其他地区相比,1908年《维也纳国际货物销售公约》在非洲的通过速度较慢。《公约》被广泛认为是国际商法协调方面最成功的文书之一。它已被世界各地区的94个国家采用,占国际销售额的80%以上。尽管如此,到目前为止,只有14个非洲国家采用了该法案。本文的研究问题是,与世界其他地区的国家相比,为什么非洲国家一直不愿采用《销售公约》。这篇文章的目的是确定和分析非洲国家在采用《销售公约》方面如此缓慢的可能原因,并提出改善这种情况的解决方案。原因包括对《公约》的无知、政府和企业的冷漠,以及其他区域协调文书的存在,如非洲商法协调组织(OHADA)。有人认为,更大程度接受的动力在于可能来自东部和南部非洲共同市场(东南非共同市场)、南部非洲发展共同体(南共体)和新成立的非洲大陆自由贸易区协定(AfCFT)等区域贸易集团的压力。也有人认为,如果对新一代律师进行《公约》方面的教育,从业者的更高认识可能在未来发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Adoption of the Vienna Convention for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) 1980 in Africa—A Critical Analysis
The adoption of the Vienna Convention for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) 1908 in Africa has been slow in comparison to other regions of the world. The Convention is widely regarded as one of the most successful instruments of international commercial law harmonisation. It has been adopted by ninety-four countries from all regions of the world representing more than eighty per cent of international sales. Despite this, only fourteen African countries have adopted it so far. The research question in this article is why African countries have been reluctant to adopt the CISG, compared to countries from other regions around the world. The aim of the article is to establish and analyse the possible reasons why African countries have been so slow in adopting the CISG and to suggest solutions to improve the situation. The reasons include an ignorance about the Convention, apathy on the side of governments and business alike and the existence of other regional harmonisation instruments such as the Organisation for the Harmonisation of Business Law in Africa (OHADA). It is argued that the impetus for greater acceptance lies within the pressure that might emanate from regional trading blocs such as the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA), the Southern African Development Community (SADC) and the newly formed African Continental Free Trade Area Agreement (AfCFT). It is also argued that greater awareness amongst practitioners may play a future role if the new generation of lawyers are educated on the Convention.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
Corporate Social Responsibility as an Enabler of Socio-economic Restoration in Post-COVID-19 Business Environment in South Africa and Nigeria International Law’s Specialised Regime and Normative Conflict: A Reflection on International Criminal Law Accommodating New Modes of Work in the Era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution in Ghana: Some Comparative Lessons from the United Kingdom and South Africa A Flexible Approach to Enabling the Free Movement of People in Southern Africa Evaluating the Individual Criminal Responsibility of Gukurahundi Perpetrators under International Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1