家庭护理人员的招募、保留和坚持:多站点试验的经验教训

Leidy Johanna Rueda Díaz, Erika de Souza Guedes, Diná de Almeida Lopes Monteiro da Cruz
{"title":"家庭护理人员的招募、保留和坚持:多站点试验的经验教训","authors":"Leidy Johanna Rueda Díaz, Erika de Souza Guedes, Diná de Almeida Lopes Monteiro da Cruz","doi":"10.17533/udea.iee.v41n2e04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the recruitment, retention of family caregivers, and adherence to a telephone based intervention evaluated in a multi-site trial and provide recommendations for the design of future studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A descriptive study based on a secondary analysis of a multi-site clinical development in Colombia and Brazil. Recruitment was measured by the number of participants eligible and consented. Retention was assessed by the percentage of participants with outcomes data at two follow-ups. The intervention adherence was measured by the percentage of the caregiver who received the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the family caregivers assessed, 63% were eligible, and 32.9% declined to be in the study for time restriction or no interest. In Colombia, the total retention rate of caregivers was 63.4% at the first follow-up and 48% at the second follow-up, while in Brazil was de 52.8% and 46.2%, respectively. At the end of the study, the sample comprised 28 and 70 caregivers in the intervention and control groups, respectively, for a retention rate of 47%. Of 104 family caregivers allocated to the intervention group, 42 (40.3%) received five sessions. Most reported not completing the Caregiver's Activity Diary.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The recruitment of family caregivers, participant retention, and adherence to the telephone intervention was unsuccessful. Future studies should apply an assessment tool during the recruitment of family caregivers and replace the term \"caregiver\" with \"care provider\" in the material involved in the research; define a retention protocol before starting the study and involve family caregivers in the design of the interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":53477,"journal":{"name":"Investigacion y Educacion en Enfermeria","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recruitment, retention, and adherence of family caregivers: Lessons from a multisite trial.\",\"authors\":\"Leidy Johanna Rueda Díaz, Erika de Souza Guedes, Diná de Almeida Lopes Monteiro da Cruz\",\"doi\":\"10.17533/udea.iee.v41n2e04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the recruitment, retention of family caregivers, and adherence to a telephone based intervention evaluated in a multi-site trial and provide recommendations for the design of future studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A descriptive study based on a secondary analysis of a multi-site clinical development in Colombia and Brazil. Recruitment was measured by the number of participants eligible and consented. Retention was assessed by the percentage of participants with outcomes data at two follow-ups. The intervention adherence was measured by the percentage of the caregiver who received the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the family caregivers assessed, 63% were eligible, and 32.9% declined to be in the study for time restriction or no interest. In Colombia, the total retention rate of caregivers was 63.4% at the first follow-up and 48% at the second follow-up, while in Brazil was de 52.8% and 46.2%, respectively. At the end of the study, the sample comprised 28 and 70 caregivers in the intervention and control groups, respectively, for a retention rate of 47%. Of 104 family caregivers allocated to the intervention group, 42 (40.3%) received five sessions. Most reported not completing the Caregiver's Activity Diary.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The recruitment of family caregivers, participant retention, and adherence to the telephone intervention was unsuccessful. Future studies should apply an assessment tool during the recruitment of family caregivers and replace the term \\\"caregiver\\\" with \\\"care provider\\\" in the material involved in the research; define a retention protocol before starting the study and involve family caregivers in the design of the interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Investigacion y Educacion en Enfermeria\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Investigacion y Educacion en Enfermeria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v41n2e04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigacion y Educacion en Enfermeria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.iee.v41n2e04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

客观的描述在多站点试验中评估的招募、保留家庭护理人员和坚持电话干预的情况,并为未来研究的设计提供建议。方法。一项基于对哥伦比亚和巴西多站点临床发展的二次分析的描述性研究。招募是根据符合条件和同意的参与者人数来衡量的。通过两次随访中有结果的参与者的百分比来评估保留率。干预依从性是通过接受干预的护理者的百分比来衡量的。后果在接受评估的家庭照顾者中,63%符合条件,32.9%的人因时间限制或不感兴趣而拒绝参加研究。在哥伦比亚,第一次随访时照顾者的总保留率为63.4%,第二次随访时为48%,而在巴西分别为52.8%和46.2%。研究结束时,样本分别包括干预组和对照组的28名和70名护理人员,保留率为47%。在被分配到干预组的104名家庭护理人员中,42人(40.3%)接受了5次治疗。大多数人报告没有完成护理人员的活动日记。结论招募家庭护理人员、保留参与者和坚持电话干预均未成功。未来的研究应在招募家庭护理人员时应用评估工具,并将“护理人员”一词替换为“护理提供者”;在研究所涉及的材料中;在开始研究之前确定一个保留方案,并让家庭护理人员参与干预措施的设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Recruitment, retention, and adherence of family caregivers: Lessons from a multisite trial.

Objective: To describe the recruitment, retention of family caregivers, and adherence to a telephone based intervention evaluated in a multi-site trial and provide recommendations for the design of future studies.

Methods: A descriptive study based on a secondary analysis of a multi-site clinical development in Colombia and Brazil. Recruitment was measured by the number of participants eligible and consented. Retention was assessed by the percentage of participants with outcomes data at two follow-ups. The intervention adherence was measured by the percentage of the caregiver who received the intervention.

Results: Of the family caregivers assessed, 63% were eligible, and 32.9% declined to be in the study for time restriction or no interest. In Colombia, the total retention rate of caregivers was 63.4% at the first follow-up and 48% at the second follow-up, while in Brazil was de 52.8% and 46.2%, respectively. At the end of the study, the sample comprised 28 and 70 caregivers in the intervention and control groups, respectively, for a retention rate of 47%. Of 104 family caregivers allocated to the intervention group, 42 (40.3%) received five sessions. Most reported not completing the Caregiver's Activity Diary.

Conclusion: The recruitment of family caregivers, participant retention, and adherence to the telephone intervention was unsuccessful. Future studies should apply an assessment tool during the recruitment of family caregivers and replace the term "caregiver" with "care provider" in the material involved in the research; define a retention protocol before starting the study and involve family caregivers in the design of the interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Investigacion y Educacion en Enfermeria
Investigacion y Educacion en Enfermeria Nursing-Maternity and Midwifery
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of the journal of Nursing and Education is to present scientific and technical information about health, illnesses and related topics. The journal serves as the conduit [medium] through which the experiences of our own nursing and social science departments can be shared within Columbia and internationally. It is written primarily for nurses, general health practitioners and other related disciplines but can also be used by students and researchers.
期刊最新文献
10.17533/udea.iee.v42n2e16. Advancement in knowledge and skills of nursing students in operation theatre procedures with mobile based learning. Analysis of the Formation of Scientific Communities in the Journal Research and Education in Nursing (2010 - 2020) and its Disciplinary Influence: an Approach from Bibliometric Analysis, Network Analysis, and Natural Language Processing. Development and Evaluation of a Software Designed by a Nursing and Technology Team to Assess the Health Status of Adults over 65 Years of Age. Development and Validation of a questionnaire on human dignity in nursing cares: an exploratory sequential mixed study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1