满足流域规划需求的2个流域模型评估

IF 1.1 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 LIMNOLOGY Lake and Reservoir Management Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/10402381.2021.2007181
R. Hanson, June Hammond Rowan, Mark Green
{"title":"满足流域规划需求的2个流域模型评估","authors":"R. Hanson, June Hammond Rowan, Mark Green","doi":"10.1080/10402381.2021.2007181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Hanson R, Hammond Rowan J, Green M. 2022. As assessment of 2 watershed models to meet watershed planning needs. Lake Reserv Manage. 38:16–27. Watershed models provide a quantitative approach for estimating loads, providing source load estimates, and evaluating various management alternatives to determine the best and most efficient actions to reduce pollutant loads. For watershed plans to be approved by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and state agencies and to obtain Clean Water Act Section 319 funding, a modeling component is required. In this study, we tested 2 watershed quality models, STEPL and SWAT, in a New Hampshire watershed to determine, when there are limited data available, whether the investment of resources required for a more complex model produces a more accurate understanding of phosphorus loads for the purpose of watershed planning. We found that while a simple model such as STEPL does not provide understanding of the complexities and unique nature of different watersheds, it easily provides quantitative estimates of long-term mean pollutant loads that, based on available data and state guidance, are adequate for watershed planning purposes. A more sophisticated model, such as SWAT, can provide more insight into watershed dynamics, but to be used to its full potential it requires far more data and expertise than may exist in watershed groups and municipalities involved with applied watershed management planning. We recommend that watershed plans include goals for implementing studies that produce rich datasets and more sophisticated modeling as a long-term watershed management objective to improve understanding about watershed dynamics and predict how management actions will affect pollutant loads to achieve overall water quality improvement goals.","PeriodicalId":18017,"journal":{"name":"Lake and Reservoir Management","volume":"38 1","pages":"16 - 27"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An assessment of 2 watershed models to meet watershed planning needs\",\"authors\":\"R. Hanson, June Hammond Rowan, Mark Green\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10402381.2021.2007181\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Hanson R, Hammond Rowan J, Green M. 2022. As assessment of 2 watershed models to meet watershed planning needs. Lake Reserv Manage. 38:16–27. Watershed models provide a quantitative approach for estimating loads, providing source load estimates, and evaluating various management alternatives to determine the best and most efficient actions to reduce pollutant loads. For watershed plans to be approved by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and state agencies and to obtain Clean Water Act Section 319 funding, a modeling component is required. In this study, we tested 2 watershed quality models, STEPL and SWAT, in a New Hampshire watershed to determine, when there are limited data available, whether the investment of resources required for a more complex model produces a more accurate understanding of phosphorus loads for the purpose of watershed planning. We found that while a simple model such as STEPL does not provide understanding of the complexities and unique nature of different watersheds, it easily provides quantitative estimates of long-term mean pollutant loads that, based on available data and state guidance, are adequate for watershed planning purposes. A more sophisticated model, such as SWAT, can provide more insight into watershed dynamics, but to be used to its full potential it requires far more data and expertise than may exist in watershed groups and municipalities involved with applied watershed management planning. We recommend that watershed plans include goals for implementing studies that produce rich datasets and more sophisticated modeling as a long-term watershed management objective to improve understanding about watershed dynamics and predict how management actions will affect pollutant loads to achieve overall water quality improvement goals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lake and Reservoir Management\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"16 - 27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lake and Reservoir Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10402381.2021.2007181\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LIMNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lake and Reservoir Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10402381.2021.2007181","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LIMNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要Hanson R,Hammond Rowan J,Green M.2022。作为2个流域模型的评估,以满足流域规划的需要。湖泊保护区管理。38:16–27.流域模型提供了一种定量方法来估计负荷,提供源负荷估计,并评估各种管理备选方案,以确定减少污染物负荷的最佳和最有效的行动。对于要获得美国环境保护局(EPA)和州机构批准的流域计划,以及要获得《清洁水法》第319条的资金,需要一个建模组件。在这项研究中,我们在新罕布什尔州的一个流域测试了两个流域质量模型,STEPL和SWAT,以确定在可用数据有限的情况下,更复杂的模型所需的资源投资是否能更准确地了解流域规划中的磷负荷。我们发现,虽然像STEPL这样的简单模型不能理解不同流域的复杂性和独特性,但它很容易提供长期平均污染物负荷的定量估计,根据现有数据和国家指导,这些估计足以用于流域规划。更复杂的模型,如SWAT,可以对流域动态提供更多的见解,但要充分发挥其潜力,它需要比参与应用流域管理规划的流域团体和市镇更多的数据和专业知识。我们建议流域计划包括实施研究的目标,这些研究产生丰富的数据集和更复杂的建模,作为长期流域管理目标,以提高对流域动态的理解,并预测管理行动将如何影响污染物负荷,从而实现整体水质改善目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An assessment of 2 watershed models to meet watershed planning needs
Abstract Hanson R, Hammond Rowan J, Green M. 2022. As assessment of 2 watershed models to meet watershed planning needs. Lake Reserv Manage. 38:16–27. Watershed models provide a quantitative approach for estimating loads, providing source load estimates, and evaluating various management alternatives to determine the best and most efficient actions to reduce pollutant loads. For watershed plans to be approved by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and state agencies and to obtain Clean Water Act Section 319 funding, a modeling component is required. In this study, we tested 2 watershed quality models, STEPL and SWAT, in a New Hampshire watershed to determine, when there are limited data available, whether the investment of resources required for a more complex model produces a more accurate understanding of phosphorus loads for the purpose of watershed planning. We found that while a simple model such as STEPL does not provide understanding of the complexities and unique nature of different watersheds, it easily provides quantitative estimates of long-term mean pollutant loads that, based on available data and state guidance, are adequate for watershed planning purposes. A more sophisticated model, such as SWAT, can provide more insight into watershed dynamics, but to be used to its full potential it requires far more data and expertise than may exist in watershed groups and municipalities involved with applied watershed management planning. We recommend that watershed plans include goals for implementing studies that produce rich datasets and more sophisticated modeling as a long-term watershed management objective to improve understanding about watershed dynamics and predict how management actions will affect pollutant loads to achieve overall water quality improvement goals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lake and Reservoir Management
Lake and Reservoir Management 环境科学-海洋与淡水生物学
自引率
6.70%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Lake and Reservoir Management (LRM) publishes original, previously unpublished studies relevant to lake and reservoir management. Papers address the management of lakes and reservoirs, their watersheds and tributaries, along with the limnology and ecology needed for sound management of these systems. Case studies that advance the science of lake management or confirm important management concepts are appropriate as long as there is clearly described management significance. Papers on economic, social, regulatory and policy aspects of lake management are also welcome with appropriate supporting data and management implications. Literature syntheses and papers developing a conceptual foundation of lake and watershed ecology will be considered for publication, but there needs to be clear emphasis on management implications. Modeling papers will be considered where the model is properly verified but it is also highly preferable that management based on the model has been taken and results have been documented. Application of known models to yet another system without a clear advance in resultant management are unlikely to be accepted. Shorter notes that convey important early results of long-term studies or provide data relating to causative agents or management approaches that warrant further study are acceptable even if the story is not yet complete. All submissions are subject to peer review to assure relevance and reliability for management application.
期刊最新文献
Spatial-temporal shifts in submersed aquatic vegetation community structure resulting from a selective herbicide treatment in Lake Sampson, Florida, USA Relative energy and perceived impact of vessel-generated waves in fetch-limited environments Watershed grassland fires drive nutrient increases in replicated experimental ponds Reservoir siltation and sediment characterization for reuse as construction material in a semi-arid area Assessing the efficacy of spring stocking of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) into a eutrophic reservoir
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1