荷兰刑事法院数据作为证据的使用

B. Custers, L. Stevens
{"title":"荷兰刑事法院数据作为证据的使用","authors":"B. Custers, L. Stevens","doi":"10.1163/15718174-BJA10015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nDigital traces that people leave behind in our digitalized society can be useful evidence in criminal courts. The central question of this article (how is the use of data as evidence in Dutch criminal courts regulated and, considering how these courts deal with such data as evidence in practice, what is needed?) is answered by analyzing the relevant legal frameworks for processing data in Dutch criminal courts: criminal law and data protection law. Next, current court practices are examined, by looking at typical case law and current developments in society and technology. Comparing the legal framework and actual practices, we conclude that the existing legal framework in the Netherlands does not obstruct the collection of data for evidence, but that regulation on collection (in criminal law) and regulation on processing and analysis (in data protection law) are not integrated. Remarkable is the almost complete absence of regulation of automated data analysis – in contrast with the many rules for data collection.","PeriodicalId":43762,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Crime Criminal Law and Criminal Justice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Use of Data as Evidence in Dutch Criminal Courts\",\"authors\":\"B. Custers, L. Stevens\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15718174-BJA10015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nDigital traces that people leave behind in our digitalized society can be useful evidence in criminal courts. The central question of this article (how is the use of data as evidence in Dutch criminal courts regulated and, considering how these courts deal with such data as evidence in practice, what is needed?) is answered by analyzing the relevant legal frameworks for processing data in Dutch criminal courts: criminal law and data protection law. Next, current court practices are examined, by looking at typical case law and current developments in society and technology. Comparing the legal framework and actual practices, we conclude that the existing legal framework in the Netherlands does not obstruct the collection of data for evidence, but that regulation on collection (in criminal law) and regulation on processing and analysis (in data protection law) are not integrated. Remarkable is the almost complete absence of regulation of automated data analysis – in contrast with the many rules for data collection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Crime Criminal Law and Criminal Justice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Crime Criminal Law and Criminal Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718174-BJA10015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Crime Criminal Law and Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718174-BJA10015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

人们在数字化社会中留下的数字痕迹可以成为刑事法庭上的有用证据。本文的核心问题(荷兰刑事法院如何监管数据作为证据的使用,考虑到这些法院在实践中如何处理这些数据作为证据,需要什么?)是通过分析荷兰刑事法院处理数据的相关法律框架来回答的:刑法和数据保护法。接下来,通过研究典型的判例法以及当前社会和技术的发展,来审视当前的法院实践。通过比较法律框架和实际做法,我们得出结论,荷兰现有的法律框架并不妨碍收集证据数据,但(刑法中的)收集法规和(数据保护法中的)处理和分析法规没有整合。值得注意的是,与许多数据收集规则相比,几乎完全没有对自动化数据分析进行监管。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Use of Data as Evidence in Dutch Criminal Courts
Digital traces that people leave behind in our digitalized society can be useful evidence in criminal courts. The central question of this article (how is the use of data as evidence in Dutch criminal courts regulated and, considering how these courts deal with such data as evidence in practice, what is needed?) is answered by analyzing the relevant legal frameworks for processing data in Dutch criminal courts: criminal law and data protection law. Next, current court practices are examined, by looking at typical case law and current developments in society and technology. Comparing the legal framework and actual practices, we conclude that the existing legal framework in the Netherlands does not obstruct the collection of data for evidence, but that regulation on collection (in criminal law) and regulation on processing and analysis (in data protection law) are not integrated. Remarkable is the almost complete absence of regulation of automated data analysis – in contrast with the many rules for data collection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
The Right to a Court in Cases of Administrative Liability of a Penal Character in the Field of the Protection of Financial Markets and Competition in German, French and English Law Collaborators of Justice: Consensual Procedural Forms Serving Probative Purposes Analysed Through Practitioners’ Experiences in Croatia The ‘Total-Legalization’ of Cannabis in Germany: Legal Challenges and the EU Free Market Conundrum Comparative Criminology and Comparative Criminal Justice in Contemporary Crime and Social Control Research – a Brief Overview Examining the Role of Age at Entrance in Foreign Detention for Dutch Prisoners’ Reoffending Behavior After Release
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1