健康科学学生对COVID-19焦虑的简短测量的西班牙语翻译和验证

IF 0.5 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress Pub Date : 2020-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.anyes.2020.08.001
Tomás Caycho-Rodríguez , Miguel Barboza-Palomino , José Ventura-León , Carlos Carbajal-León , Martín Noé-Grijalva , Miguel Gallegos , Mario Reyes-Bossio , Andrea Vivanco-Vidal
{"title":"健康科学学生对COVID-19焦虑的简短测量的西班牙语翻译和验证","authors":"Tomás Caycho-Rodríguez ,&nbsp;Miguel Barboza-Palomino ,&nbsp;José Ventura-León ,&nbsp;Carlos Carbajal-León ,&nbsp;Martín Noé-Grijalva ,&nbsp;Miguel Gallegos ,&nbsp;Mario Reyes-Bossio ,&nbsp;Andrea Vivanco-Vidal","doi":"10.1016/j.anyes.2020.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><p>COVID-19 has generated negative consequences for people's mental health. This is the case of Peru, one of the Latin American countries most affected by the pandemic. In this sense, the objective of the study was to translate and validate the <em>Coronavirus Anxiety Scale</em> (CAS) into Spanish.</p></div><div><h3>Material and method</h3><p>The participants were 704 university students of health sciences (M<sub>age</sub> = 23.39 years, <em>SD</em> = 3.45) who were administered the CAS in Spanish, the Mental Health Inventory-5 and the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 item. The CAS was translated into Spanish using the forward and backward method. Reliability and evidence of validity based on internal structure and relationship with other variables were examined.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The factor analysis confirmed the one-dimensional factor structure of the CAS (<em>χ</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> = 7.62, <em>df</em> = 5, <em>p</em> = .18, <em>χ</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> / gl = 1.52, <em>CFI</em> = .99, <em>RMSEA</em> = .03 [90% CI .00, .06]; <em>SRMR</em> = .02, <em>WRMR</em> = .52); In addition, the factor loadings were large and significant (from .68 to .87). The five CAS items showed acceptable corrected total test item correlations (from .64 to .74). Reliability due to internal consistency was good (ω = .89; α<sub>ordinal</sub> = .89). The validity evidence based on the relationship with other CAS variables was supported by the positive correlation with depression (<em>r</em> = .52, <em>p</em> &lt; .01) and negative with subjective well-being (<em>r</em> = -.50, <em>p</em> &lt; . 01). Furthermore, depression mediates the relationship between COVID-19 anxiety and subjective well-being (bootstrap value = - .24, 95% CI = - .28, - .20).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The Spanish version of the CAS has evidence of validity and reliability to measure anxiety by COVID-19 in a sample of Peruvian university students.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45616,"journal":{"name":"Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress","volume":"26 2","pages":"Pages 174-180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.anyes.2020.08.001","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Traducción al español y validación de una medida breve de ansiedad por la COVID-19 en estudiantes de ciencias de la salud\",\"authors\":\"Tomás Caycho-Rodríguez ,&nbsp;Miguel Barboza-Palomino ,&nbsp;José Ventura-León ,&nbsp;Carlos Carbajal-León ,&nbsp;Martín Noé-Grijalva ,&nbsp;Miguel Gallegos ,&nbsp;Mario Reyes-Bossio ,&nbsp;Andrea Vivanco-Vidal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anyes.2020.08.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><p>COVID-19 has generated negative consequences for people's mental health. This is the case of Peru, one of the Latin American countries most affected by the pandemic. In this sense, the objective of the study was to translate and validate the <em>Coronavirus Anxiety Scale</em> (CAS) into Spanish.</p></div><div><h3>Material and method</h3><p>The participants were 704 university students of health sciences (M<sub>age</sub> = 23.39 years, <em>SD</em> = 3.45) who were administered the CAS in Spanish, the Mental Health Inventory-5 and the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 item. The CAS was translated into Spanish using the forward and backward method. Reliability and evidence of validity based on internal structure and relationship with other variables were examined.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The factor analysis confirmed the one-dimensional factor structure of the CAS (<em>χ</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> = 7.62, <em>df</em> = 5, <em>p</em> = .18, <em>χ</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> / gl = 1.52, <em>CFI</em> = .99, <em>RMSEA</em> = .03 [90% CI .00, .06]; <em>SRMR</em> = .02, <em>WRMR</em> = .52); In addition, the factor loadings were large and significant (from .68 to .87). The five CAS items showed acceptable corrected total test item correlations (from .64 to .74). Reliability due to internal consistency was good (ω = .89; α<sub>ordinal</sub> = .89). The validity evidence based on the relationship with other CAS variables was supported by the positive correlation with depression (<em>r</em> = .52, <em>p</em> &lt; .01) and negative with subjective well-being (<em>r</em> = -.50, <em>p</em> &lt; . 01). Furthermore, depression mediates the relationship between COVID-19 anxiety and subjective well-being (bootstrap value = - .24, 95% CI = - .28, - .20).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The Spanish version of the CAS has evidence of validity and reliability to measure anxiety by COVID-19 in a sample of Peruvian university students.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress\",\"volume\":\"26 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 174-180\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.anyes.2020.08.001\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1134793720300348\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1134793720300348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

前言和目标2019冠状病毒病对人们的心理健康产生了负面影响。秘鲁就是这种情况,它是受这一流行病影响最严重的拉丁美洲国家之一。从这个意义上说,这项研究的目的是将冠状病毒焦虑量表(CAS)翻译并验证为西班牙语。材料与方法对704名健康科学专业大学生(年龄23.39岁,SD = 3.45)进行西班牙语CAS、心理健康问卷第5项和患者健康问卷第2项的调查。采用正反译法将CAS翻译成西班牙文。基于内部结构和与其他变量关系的信度和效度证据进行了检验。结果因子分析证实了CAS的一维因子结构(χ2 = 7.62, df = 5, p = .18, χ2 / gl = 1.52, CFI = .99, RMSEA = .03 [90% CI .00, .06];SRMR = .02, WRMR = .52);此外,因子负荷很大且显著(从0.68到0.87)。五个CAS项目显示出可接受的校正的总测试项目相关性(从0.64到0.74)。内部一致性的信度良好(ω = 0.89;α序数= .89)。基于与其他CAS变量关系的效度证据与抑郁呈正相关(r = .52, p <.01),与主观幸福感呈负相关(r = -。50, p <。01)。此外,抑郁介导COVID-19焦虑与主观幸福感之间的关系(bootstrap值= - 0.24,95% CI = - 0.28, - 0.20)。结论西班牙语版CAS在秘鲁大学生中测量COVID-19焦虑具有效度和信度证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Traducción al español y validación de una medida breve de ansiedad por la COVID-19 en estudiantes de ciencias de la salud

Introduction and objectives

COVID-19 has generated negative consequences for people's mental health. This is the case of Peru, one of the Latin American countries most affected by the pandemic. In this sense, the objective of the study was to translate and validate the Coronavirus Anxiety Scale (CAS) into Spanish.

Material and method

The participants were 704 university students of health sciences (Mage = 23.39 years, SD = 3.45) who were administered the CAS in Spanish, the Mental Health Inventory-5 and the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 item. The CAS was translated into Spanish using the forward and backward method. Reliability and evidence of validity based on internal structure and relationship with other variables were examined.

Results

The factor analysis confirmed the one-dimensional factor structure of the CAS (χ2 = 7.62, df = 5, p = .18, χ2 / gl = 1.52, CFI = .99, RMSEA = .03 [90% CI .00, .06]; SRMR = .02, WRMR = .52); In addition, the factor loadings were large and significant (from .68 to .87). The five CAS items showed acceptable corrected total test item correlations (from .64 to .74). Reliability due to internal consistency was good (ω = .89; αordinal = .89). The validity evidence based on the relationship with other CAS variables was supported by the positive correlation with depression (r = .52, p < .01) and negative with subjective well-being (r = -.50, p < . 01). Furthermore, depression mediates the relationship between COVID-19 anxiety and subjective well-being (bootstrap value = - .24, 95% CI = - .28, - .20).

Conclusion

The Spanish version of the CAS has evidence of validity and reliability to measure anxiety by COVID-19 in a sample of Peruvian university students.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress
Ansiedad y Estres-Anxiety and Stress PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Factor structure and reliability of the Lasher and Faulkender’s Anxiety about Aging Scale in Mexican adults Ansiedad precompetitiva y habilidades psicológicas relacionadas con el rendimiento deportivo How to evaluate coping strategies for stressful situations? Validation of the CSI in a Spanish university population Propiedades psicométricas del Cuestionario de Ansiedad Social para Adultos (CASO) en población Dominicana Diseño y validación de un cuestionario para la detección de Abusos Sexuales Infantiles en personas adultas con adicción
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1