{"title":"使用系统顾问模型优化分段聚焦CST收集器,并与中央接收器系统进行比较","authors":"D. Bisset","doi":"10.1115/1.4062446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Heat collection performance simulations using the System Advisor Model (SAM) with Typical Meteorological Year weather data from four geographic locations are used to investigate (a) the optimum overall tilt of Piecewise-Focusing (PWF) collectors, and (b) PWF collector performance in comparison to the SAM default central receiver system. Results show that the overall tilt angle is not critical, but values up to 50 degrees are best at non-tropical latitudes, even when output in summer is more valuable than in winter. For tropical latitudes, 40 degrees of tilt is sufficient. Increasing PWF collector width relative to height is advantageous. Depending on location, PWF collector performance is 66% to 90% better than for the SAM default 100 MWe central receiver system, per m2 of reflector or heliostat. Using SAM's detailed control over system parameters, it is shown that the PWF collector's superior performance is derived mainly from better geometry (smaller cosine losses), but the near-absence of atmospheric attenuation and the smaller receiver heat losses are also significant.","PeriodicalId":17124,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Solar Energy Engineering-transactions of The Asme","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimization of Piecewise-Focusing CST collectors using the System Advisor Model, and comparison to a central receiver system\",\"authors\":\"D. Bisset\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/1.4062446\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Heat collection performance simulations using the System Advisor Model (SAM) with Typical Meteorological Year weather data from four geographic locations are used to investigate (a) the optimum overall tilt of Piecewise-Focusing (PWF) collectors, and (b) PWF collector performance in comparison to the SAM default central receiver system. Results show that the overall tilt angle is not critical, but values up to 50 degrees are best at non-tropical latitudes, even when output in summer is more valuable than in winter. For tropical latitudes, 40 degrees of tilt is sufficient. Increasing PWF collector width relative to height is advantageous. Depending on location, PWF collector performance is 66% to 90% better than for the SAM default 100 MWe central receiver system, per m2 of reflector or heliostat. Using SAM's detailed control over system parameters, it is shown that the PWF collector's superior performance is derived mainly from better geometry (smaller cosine losses), but the near-absence of atmospheric attenuation and the smaller receiver heat losses are also significant.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Solar Energy Engineering-transactions of The Asme\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Solar Energy Engineering-transactions of The Asme\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4062446\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Solar Energy Engineering-transactions of The Asme","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4062446","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Optimization of Piecewise-Focusing CST collectors using the System Advisor Model, and comparison to a central receiver system
Heat collection performance simulations using the System Advisor Model (SAM) with Typical Meteorological Year weather data from four geographic locations are used to investigate (a) the optimum overall tilt of Piecewise-Focusing (PWF) collectors, and (b) PWF collector performance in comparison to the SAM default central receiver system. Results show that the overall tilt angle is not critical, but values up to 50 degrees are best at non-tropical latitudes, even when output in summer is more valuable than in winter. For tropical latitudes, 40 degrees of tilt is sufficient. Increasing PWF collector width relative to height is advantageous. Depending on location, PWF collector performance is 66% to 90% better than for the SAM default 100 MWe central receiver system, per m2 of reflector or heliostat. Using SAM's detailed control over system parameters, it is shown that the PWF collector's superior performance is derived mainly from better geometry (smaller cosine losses), but the near-absence of atmospheric attenuation and the smaller receiver heat losses are also significant.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Solar Energy Engineering - Including Wind Energy and Building Energy Conservation - publishes research papers that contain original work of permanent interest in all areas of solar energy and energy conservation, as well as discussions of policy and regulatory issues that affect renewable energy technologies and their implementation. Papers that do not include original work, but nonetheless present quality analysis or incremental improvements to past work may be published as Technical Briefs. Review papers are accepted but should be discussed with the Editor prior to submission. The Journal also publishes a section called Solar Scenery that features photographs or graphical displays of significant new installations or research facilities.