数据可视化中的定性不确定性沟通

Q3 Social Sciences Information Design Journal Pub Date : 2022-11-07 DOI:10.1075/idj.22014.pan
G. Panagiotidou, A. Vande Moere
{"title":"数据可视化中的定性不确定性沟通","authors":"G. Panagiotidou, A. Vande Moere","doi":"10.1075/idj.22014.pan","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Qualitative uncertainty refers to the implicit and underlying issues that are imbued in data, such as the\n circumstances of its collection, its storage or even biases and assumptions made by its authors. Although such uncertainty can\n jeopardize the validity of the data analysis, it is often overlooked in visualizations, due to it being indirect and\n non-quantifiable. In this paper we present two case studies within the digital humanities in which we examined how to integrate\n uncertainty in our visualization designs. Using these cases as a starting point we propose four considerations for data\n visualization research in relation to indirect, qualitative uncertainty: (1) we suggest that uncertainty in visualization should\n be examined within its socio-technological context, (2) we propose the use of interaction design patterns to design for it, (3) we\n argue for more attention to be paid to the data generation process in the humanities, and (4) we call for the further development\n of participatory activities specifically catered for understanding qualitative uncertainties. While our findings are grounded in\n the humanities, we believe that these considerations can be beneficial for other settings where indirect uncertainty plays an\n equally prevalent role.","PeriodicalId":35109,"journal":{"name":"Information Design Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Communicating qualitative uncertainty in data visualization\",\"authors\":\"G. Panagiotidou, A. Vande Moere\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/idj.22014.pan\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Qualitative uncertainty refers to the implicit and underlying issues that are imbued in data, such as the\\n circumstances of its collection, its storage or even biases and assumptions made by its authors. Although such uncertainty can\\n jeopardize the validity of the data analysis, it is often overlooked in visualizations, due to it being indirect and\\n non-quantifiable. In this paper we present two case studies within the digital humanities in which we examined how to integrate\\n uncertainty in our visualization designs. Using these cases as a starting point we propose four considerations for data\\n visualization research in relation to indirect, qualitative uncertainty: (1) we suggest that uncertainty in visualization should\\n be examined within its socio-technological context, (2) we propose the use of interaction design patterns to design for it, (3) we\\n argue for more attention to be paid to the data generation process in the humanities, and (4) we call for the further development\\n of participatory activities specifically catered for understanding qualitative uncertainties. While our findings are grounded in\\n the humanities, we believe that these considerations can be beneficial for other settings where indirect uncertainty plays an\\n equally prevalent role.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Design Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Design Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.22014.pan\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Design Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/idj.22014.pan","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

定性不确定性指的是数据中隐含的和潜在的问题,比如数据收集的环境、存储的环境,甚至是数据作者的偏见和假设。尽管这种不确定性可能危及数据分析的有效性,但由于它是间接的和不可量化的,因此在可视化中经常被忽视。在本文中,我们提出了数字人文学科中的两个案例研究,其中我们研究了如何将不确定性整合到我们的可视化设计中。以这些案例为出发点,我们提出了与间接定性不确定性相关的数据可视化研究的四个考虑因素:(1)我们建议可视化中的不确定性应该在其社会技术背景下进行研究,(2)我们建议使用交互设计模式进行设计,(3)我们主张更多地关注人文学科的数据生成过程,(4)我们呼吁进一步发展专门针对理解定性不确定性的参与性活动。虽然我们的发现是建立在人文学科的基础上,但我们相信这些考虑对于间接不确定性同样普遍存在的其他环境是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Communicating qualitative uncertainty in data visualization
Qualitative uncertainty refers to the implicit and underlying issues that are imbued in data, such as the circumstances of its collection, its storage or even biases and assumptions made by its authors. Although such uncertainty can jeopardize the validity of the data analysis, it is often overlooked in visualizations, due to it being indirect and non-quantifiable. In this paper we present two case studies within the digital humanities in which we examined how to integrate uncertainty in our visualization designs. Using these cases as a starting point we propose four considerations for data visualization research in relation to indirect, qualitative uncertainty: (1) we suggest that uncertainty in visualization should be examined within its socio-technological context, (2) we propose the use of interaction design patterns to design for it, (3) we argue for more attention to be paid to the data generation process in the humanities, and (4) we call for the further development of participatory activities specifically catered for understanding qualitative uncertainties. While our findings are grounded in the humanities, we believe that these considerations can be beneficial for other settings where indirect uncertainty plays an equally prevalent role.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Information Design Journal
Information Design Journal Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Information Design Journal (IDJ) is a peer reviewed international journal that bridges the gap between research and practice in information design. IDJ is a platform for discussing and improving the design, usability, and overall effectiveness of ‘content put into form’ — of verbal and visual messages shaped to meet the needs of particular audiences. IDJ offers a forum for sharing ideas about the verbal, visual, and typographic design of print and online documents, multimedia presentations, illustrations, signage, interfaces, maps, quantitative displays, websites, and new media. IDJ brings together ways of thinking about creating effective communications for use in contexts such as workplaces, hospitals, airports, banks, schools, or government agencies.
期刊最新文献
Social commitment and challenges of information design Script-style degrees Review of Pontis & Babwahsingh (2023): Information Design Unbound: Key Concepts and Skills for Making Sense in a Changing World Visual instructions for writing Chinese for beginners Testing the effectiveness of a supportive digital information tool for patients recovering from bowel surgery, their surgeons and nurses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1