阿司匹林可能不能有效预防半月板根修复后深静脉血栓形成:一项回顾性队列研究

IF 0.2 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Current Orthopaedic Practice Pub Date : 2022-09-06 DOI:10.1097/BCO.0000000000001173
Scott A. Smith, Robert J. Pettit, D. Flanigan, R. Magnussen
{"title":"阿司匹林可能不能有效预防半月板根修复后深静脉血栓形成:一项回顾性队列研究","authors":"Scott A. Smith, Robert J. Pettit, D. Flanigan, R. Magnussen","doi":"10.1097/BCO.0000000000001173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Arthroscopic knee surgery has been associated with a low risk of symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT), with previous studies demonstrating a risk of 0.12% to 3.7%. This risk of DVT and ideal prophylaxis in cases of meniscus root repair are unknown. The authors sought to determine the effectiveness of aspirin as DVT prophylaxis after meniscus root repair. The hypothesis was that there is no significant difference in the risk of symptomatic DVT after meniscus root repair with aspirin prophylaxis as compared with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or apixiban. Methods: Patients treated with repair of medial or lateral meniscus root tears over a 3 yr period were identified retrospectively. The risk of subsequent development of a symptomatic DVT was compared based on whether postoperative DVT prophylaxis was undertaken with aspirin or a stronger anticoagulant such as LMWH or apixiban. Results: Fifty-eight patients who underwent root repair (19 lateral and 39 medial) were identified. No symptomatic DVTs were identified in 42 patients (0%) who received LMWH or apixiban, but DVTs were identified in 3 of 16 patients (19%) who received aspirin (P=0.018). No significant differences in patient gender or body mass index, laterality of repair, associated procedures, or smoking history were noted between the groups. The aspirin group included older patients (mean age 49 yr) than those in the LMWH/apixiban group (mean age 39 yr). Conclusions: Aspirin alone may not be sufficient to prevent DVT after meniscus root repair. Additional work is required to clarify ideal DVT prophylaxis following this procedure. Level of Evidence: Level III.","PeriodicalId":10732,"journal":{"name":"Current Orthopaedic Practice","volume":"33 1","pages":"548 - 552"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aspirin may not be effective in prevention of deep vein thrombosis after meniscus root repair: a retrospective cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Scott A. Smith, Robert J. Pettit, D. Flanigan, R. Magnussen\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BCO.0000000000001173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Arthroscopic knee surgery has been associated with a low risk of symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT), with previous studies demonstrating a risk of 0.12% to 3.7%. This risk of DVT and ideal prophylaxis in cases of meniscus root repair are unknown. The authors sought to determine the effectiveness of aspirin as DVT prophylaxis after meniscus root repair. The hypothesis was that there is no significant difference in the risk of symptomatic DVT after meniscus root repair with aspirin prophylaxis as compared with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or apixiban. Methods: Patients treated with repair of medial or lateral meniscus root tears over a 3 yr period were identified retrospectively. The risk of subsequent development of a symptomatic DVT was compared based on whether postoperative DVT prophylaxis was undertaken with aspirin or a stronger anticoagulant such as LMWH or apixiban. Results: Fifty-eight patients who underwent root repair (19 lateral and 39 medial) were identified. No symptomatic DVTs were identified in 42 patients (0%) who received LMWH or apixiban, but DVTs were identified in 3 of 16 patients (19%) who received aspirin (P=0.018). No significant differences in patient gender or body mass index, laterality of repair, associated procedures, or smoking history were noted between the groups. The aspirin group included older patients (mean age 49 yr) than those in the LMWH/apixiban group (mean age 39 yr). Conclusions: Aspirin alone may not be sufficient to prevent DVT after meniscus root repair. Additional work is required to clarify ideal DVT prophylaxis following this procedure. Level of Evidence: Level III.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Orthopaedic Practice\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"548 - 552\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Orthopaedic Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BCO.0000000000001173\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Orthopaedic Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BCO.0000000000001173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关节镜下膝关节手术与症状性深静脉血栓形成(DVT)的低风险相关,先前的研究表明其风险为0.12%-3.7%。这种DVT的风险和半月板根部修复的理想预防方法尚不清楚。作者试图确定阿司匹林预防半月板根修复术后DVT的有效性。该假设是,与低分子肝素(LMWH)或阿哌西班相比,预防性阿司匹林在半月板根修复后出现症状性DVT的风险没有显著差异。方法:采用半月板内侧或外侧根撕裂修复术治疗3年以上的患者 对年进行回顾性鉴定。根据术后DVT预防是否使用阿司匹林或更强的抗凝剂(如LMWH或阿哌西班),比较随后发生症状性DVT的风险。结果:58名接受牙根修复的患者(19名外侧和39名内侧)被确认。42名接受低分子肝素或阿哌昔班治疗的患者(0%)未发现症状性DVT,但16名接受阿司匹林治疗的患者中有3名(19%)发现DVT(P=0.018)。两组患者在性别或体重指数、修复偏侧性、相关程序或吸烟史方面无显著差异。阿司匹林组包括老年患者(平均年龄49岁 yr)高于低分子肝素/阿哌西班组(平均年龄39岁) 年)。结论:单用阿司匹林可能不足以预防半月板根修复术后DVT。需要做更多的工作来阐明该程序后理想的DVT预防。证据级别:三级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Aspirin may not be effective in prevention of deep vein thrombosis after meniscus root repair: a retrospective cohort study
Background: Arthroscopic knee surgery has been associated with a low risk of symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT), with previous studies demonstrating a risk of 0.12% to 3.7%. This risk of DVT and ideal prophylaxis in cases of meniscus root repair are unknown. The authors sought to determine the effectiveness of aspirin as DVT prophylaxis after meniscus root repair. The hypothesis was that there is no significant difference in the risk of symptomatic DVT after meniscus root repair with aspirin prophylaxis as compared with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or apixiban. Methods: Patients treated with repair of medial or lateral meniscus root tears over a 3 yr period were identified retrospectively. The risk of subsequent development of a symptomatic DVT was compared based on whether postoperative DVT prophylaxis was undertaken with aspirin or a stronger anticoagulant such as LMWH or apixiban. Results: Fifty-eight patients who underwent root repair (19 lateral and 39 medial) were identified. No symptomatic DVTs were identified in 42 patients (0%) who received LMWH or apixiban, but DVTs were identified in 3 of 16 patients (19%) who received aspirin (P=0.018). No significant differences in patient gender or body mass index, laterality of repair, associated procedures, or smoking history were noted between the groups. The aspirin group included older patients (mean age 49 yr) than those in the LMWH/apixiban group (mean age 39 yr). Conclusions: Aspirin alone may not be sufficient to prevent DVT after meniscus root repair. Additional work is required to clarify ideal DVT prophylaxis following this procedure. Level of Evidence: Level III.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Current Orthopaedic Practice is a peer-reviewed, general orthopaedic journal that translates clinical research into best practices for diagnosing, treating, and managing musculoskeletal disorders. The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical research, invited special focus reviews and general reviews, as well as original articles on innovations in practice, case reports, point/counterpoint, and diagnostic imaging.
期刊最新文献
Machine learning review of hand surgery literature Jumpy stump syndrome treated by targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR): a case report and review of the literature Impact of COVID-19 on total hip arthroplasty: results from California state inpatient database Osteotomy via the prone transpsoas approach for lateral interbody fusion of the lumbar spine Orthopaedic surgery residency program ranking and the current state of leadership: what are the characteristics of the leaders in the “Top-tier” programs?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1