{"title":"欺诈的黄金时代已经过去了吗?","authors":"M. Leeming","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2019.1665779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Takhar v Gracefield Developments Ltd [2019] UKSC 13 holds that a litigant can apply to set aside a judgment procured by fraud even if the fraud was discoverable by reasonable diligence during the trial. The unanimous decision realigns United Kingdom law with the position in Australia and Canada. However, the four judgments delivered disclose four quite different approaches of judicial technique. This note considers those approaches as well as addressing three topics of more general significance: the way in which broadly expressed dicta may be read down, the role of an historical approach in developing the body of judge-made law, and the relationship between rules and principles in the legal system.","PeriodicalId":35148,"journal":{"name":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","volume":"19 1","pages":"298 - 306"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14729342.2019.1665779","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Has the golden age of fraud passed?\",\"authors\":\"M. Leeming\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14729342.2019.1665779\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Takhar v Gracefield Developments Ltd [2019] UKSC 13 holds that a litigant can apply to set aside a judgment procured by fraud even if the fraud was discoverable by reasonable diligence during the trial. The unanimous decision realigns United Kingdom law with the position in Australia and Canada. However, the four judgments delivered disclose four quite different approaches of judicial technique. This note considers those approaches as well as addressing three topics of more general significance: the way in which broadly expressed dicta may be read down, the role of an historical approach in developing the body of judge-made law, and the relationship between rules and principles in the legal system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"298 - 306\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14729342.2019.1665779\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14729342.2019.1665779\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14729342.2019.1665779","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Takhar v Gracefield Developments Ltd [2019] UKSC 13认为,即使在审判期间通过合理的尽职调查发现了欺诈行为,当事人也可以申请撤销由欺诈引起的判决。这一一致决定将英国法律与澳大利亚和加拿大的立场重新统一起来。然而,这四份判决书揭示了四种截然不同的司法手法。本说明考虑了这些方法,并讨论了三个更具有普遍意义的主题:广泛表达的命令的解读方式,历史方法在发展法官制定的法律主体中的作用,以及法律制度中规则与原则之间的关系。
ABSTRACT Takhar v Gracefield Developments Ltd [2019] UKSC 13 holds that a litigant can apply to set aside a judgment procured by fraud even if the fraud was discoverable by reasonable diligence during the trial. The unanimous decision realigns United Kingdom law with the position in Australia and Canada. However, the four judgments delivered disclose four quite different approaches of judicial technique. This note considers those approaches as well as addressing three topics of more general significance: the way in which broadly expressed dicta may be read down, the role of an historical approach in developing the body of judge-made law, and the relationship between rules and principles in the legal system.