欺诈的黄金时代已经过去了吗?

M. Leeming
{"title":"欺诈的黄金时代已经过去了吗?","authors":"M. Leeming","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2019.1665779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Takhar v Gracefield Developments Ltd [2019] UKSC 13 holds that a litigant can apply to set aside a judgment procured by fraud even if the fraud was discoverable by reasonable diligence during the trial. The unanimous decision realigns United Kingdom law with the position in Australia and Canada. However, the four judgments delivered disclose four quite different approaches of judicial technique. This note considers those approaches as well as addressing three topics of more general significance: the way in which broadly expressed dicta may be read down, the role of an historical approach in developing the body of judge-made law, and the relationship between rules and principles in the legal system.","PeriodicalId":35148,"journal":{"name":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","volume":"19 1","pages":"298 - 306"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14729342.2019.1665779","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Has the golden age of fraud passed?\",\"authors\":\"M. Leeming\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14729342.2019.1665779\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Takhar v Gracefield Developments Ltd [2019] UKSC 13 holds that a litigant can apply to set aside a judgment procured by fraud even if the fraud was discoverable by reasonable diligence during the trial. The unanimous decision realigns United Kingdom law with the position in Australia and Canada. However, the four judgments delivered disclose four quite different approaches of judicial technique. This note considers those approaches as well as addressing three topics of more general significance: the way in which broadly expressed dicta may be read down, the role of an historical approach in developing the body of judge-made law, and the relationship between rules and principles in the legal system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"298 - 306\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14729342.2019.1665779\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14729342.2019.1665779\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14729342.2019.1665779","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Takhar v Gracefield Developments Ltd [2019] UKSC 13认为,即使在审判期间通过合理的尽职调查发现了欺诈行为,当事人也可以申请撤销由欺诈引起的判决。这一一致决定将英国法律与澳大利亚和加拿大的立场重新统一起来。然而,这四份判决书揭示了四种截然不同的司法手法。本说明考虑了这些方法,并讨论了三个更具有普遍意义的主题:广泛表达的命令的解读方式,历史方法在发展法官制定的法律主体中的作用,以及法律制度中规则与原则之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Has the golden age of fraud passed?
ABSTRACT Takhar v Gracefield Developments Ltd [2019] UKSC 13 holds that a litigant can apply to set aside a judgment procured by fraud even if the fraud was discoverable by reasonable diligence during the trial. The unanimous decision realigns United Kingdom law with the position in Australia and Canada. However, the four judgments delivered disclose four quite different approaches of judicial technique. This note considers those approaches as well as addressing three topics of more general significance: the way in which broadly expressed dicta may be read down, the role of an historical approach in developing the body of judge-made law, and the relationship between rules and principles in the legal system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Blurring boundaries on ‘taking part’ in an unlawful assembly: HKSAR v Choy Kin Yue (2022) 25 HKCFAR 360 ‘The law has taken all my rights away’: on India’s conundrum of able-normative death with dignity ‘Delicate plants’, ‘loose cannons’, or ‘a marriage of true minds’? The role of academic literature in judicial decision-making Legal transplantation of minors’ contracts in India and Malaysia: ‘Weak’ Watson and a ‘misfitted’ transplant Corruption and the constitutional position of the Overseas Territories
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1