Care Triangle还是Care Diamond?塞尔维亚的儿童保育和老年护理案例

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q4 SOCIAL ISSUES Revija Za Socijalnu Politiku Pub Date : 2021-12-16 DOI:10.3935/rsp.v28i3.1805
Natalija Perišić, M. Pantelić
{"title":"Care Triangle还是Care Diamond?塞尔维亚的儿童保育和老年护理案例","authors":"Natalija Perišić, M. Pantelić","doi":"10.3935/rsp.v28i3.1805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Overall changes in political, social and economic spheres in Serbia, along with ongoing demographic processes, have affected various policies and all aspects of people’s lives, including system(s) of care. While care became an important analytical concept and category of social policy analysis internationally, it has not been systematically applied in the analysis of the Serbian welfare state. Incorporation of care in welfare state analysis is much needed as its organisation in the national context reveals a lot about the nature of the welfare state, changes in its socio-institutional arrangements and, most importantly, the effects of provision. This article thus aims to outline the evolution of childcare and eldercare policies in Serbia over the last decade, employing the concept of the care diamond developed by Shahra Razavi, which allows examining the “architecture” through which the care is provided: families/ households, markets, the state and the voluntary sector. By analysing the prevalent care policy “architecture” for children and the elderly in Serbia and the roles of different sectors in that respect, as well as by identifying similarities and differences in the provision of childcare and eldercare in the national context, the article exposes developments and current state in childcare and eldercare provision in Serbia. The analysis indicates the profound role of the informal sphere in both care systems in Serbia, childcare and eldercare. Some differences between the two care domains could also be noted. These relate to the configuration of welfare sectors involved in care provision, revealing the modified shape of the care diamond in the case of childcare. That is, while all four sectors are involved in providing care in the case of eldercare forming an eldercare diamond, this is not the case with childcare. In the latter case, the voluntary, nonprofit sector does not exist as a care provider in Serbia, with childcare “architecture” having a shape of a care triangle. In light of this evidence, the role of families and the voluntary, nonprofit sector should be taken into account in future planning and funding of policies as well as in their implementation. Key words: care, childcare, eldercare, care diamond, policy, provision, Serbia","PeriodicalId":53979,"journal":{"name":"Revija Za Socijalnu Politiku","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Care Triangle or Care Diamond? The Case of Childcare and Eldercare in Serbia\",\"authors\":\"Natalija Perišić, M. Pantelić\",\"doi\":\"10.3935/rsp.v28i3.1805\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Overall changes in political, social and economic spheres in Serbia, along with ongoing demographic processes, have affected various policies and all aspects of people’s lives, including system(s) of care. While care became an important analytical concept and category of social policy analysis internationally, it has not been systematically applied in the analysis of the Serbian welfare state. Incorporation of care in welfare state analysis is much needed as its organisation in the national context reveals a lot about the nature of the welfare state, changes in its socio-institutional arrangements and, most importantly, the effects of provision. This article thus aims to outline the evolution of childcare and eldercare policies in Serbia over the last decade, employing the concept of the care diamond developed by Shahra Razavi, which allows examining the “architecture” through which the care is provided: families/ households, markets, the state and the voluntary sector. By analysing the prevalent care policy “architecture” for children and the elderly in Serbia and the roles of different sectors in that respect, as well as by identifying similarities and differences in the provision of childcare and eldercare in the national context, the article exposes developments and current state in childcare and eldercare provision in Serbia. The analysis indicates the profound role of the informal sphere in both care systems in Serbia, childcare and eldercare. Some differences between the two care domains could also be noted. These relate to the configuration of welfare sectors involved in care provision, revealing the modified shape of the care diamond in the case of childcare. That is, while all four sectors are involved in providing care in the case of eldercare forming an eldercare diamond, this is not the case with childcare. In the latter case, the voluntary, nonprofit sector does not exist as a care provider in Serbia, with childcare “architecture” having a shape of a care triangle. In light of this evidence, the role of families and the voluntary, nonprofit sector should be taken into account in future planning and funding of policies as well as in their implementation. Key words: care, childcare, eldercare, care diamond, policy, provision, Serbia\",\"PeriodicalId\":53979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revija Za Socijalnu Politiku\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revija Za Socijalnu Politiku\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3935/rsp.v28i3.1805\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL ISSUES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revija Za Socijalnu Politiku","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3935/rsp.v28i3.1805","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

塞尔维亚政治、社会和经济领域的全面变化,以及正在进行的人口进程,已经影响到各种政策和人民生活的所有方面,包括护理制度。虽然关怀在国际上成为社会政策分析的一个重要分析概念和范畴,但它并没有被系统地应用于对塞尔维亚福利国家的分析。在福利国家分析中纳入关怀是非常必要的,因为它在国家背景下的组织揭示了很多关于福利国家的本质、社会制度安排的变化,最重要的是,提供的影响。因此,本文旨在概述过去十年来塞尔维亚儿童保育和老年人护理政策的演变,采用Shahra Razavi提出的护理钻石概念,该概念允许检查提供护理的“架构”:家庭/家庭、市场、国家和志愿部门。通过分析塞尔维亚儿童和老年人的普遍护理政策“架构”以及不同部门在这方面的作用,以及通过确定在全国范围内提供儿童保育和老年人护理的异同,文章揭示了塞尔维亚儿童保育和老年人护理的发展和现状。分析表明,非正规领域在塞尔维亚的照料系统、儿童保育和老年人照料方面发挥了深远的作用。两个护理领域之间的一些差异也可以注意到。这些涉及到提供护理的福利部门的配置,揭示了在儿童保育的情况下护理钻石的修改形状。也就是说,虽然所有四个部门都参与了老年护理的提供,形成了老年护理钻石,但儿童保育并非如此。在后一种情况下,塞尔维亚不存在自愿的非营利部门作为护理提供者,儿童保育“建筑”具有护理三角形的形状。根据这些证据,在未来的政策规划和资助以及政策的实施中,应该考虑到家庭和自愿、非营利部门的作用。关键词:护理,儿童保育,老年护理,护理钻石,政策,提供,塞尔维亚
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Care Triangle or Care Diamond? The Case of Childcare and Eldercare in Serbia
Overall changes in political, social and economic spheres in Serbia, along with ongoing demographic processes, have affected various policies and all aspects of people’s lives, including system(s) of care. While care became an important analytical concept and category of social policy analysis internationally, it has not been systematically applied in the analysis of the Serbian welfare state. Incorporation of care in welfare state analysis is much needed as its organisation in the national context reveals a lot about the nature of the welfare state, changes in its socio-institutional arrangements and, most importantly, the effects of provision. This article thus aims to outline the evolution of childcare and eldercare policies in Serbia over the last decade, employing the concept of the care diamond developed by Shahra Razavi, which allows examining the “architecture” through which the care is provided: families/ households, markets, the state and the voluntary sector. By analysing the prevalent care policy “architecture” for children and the elderly in Serbia and the roles of different sectors in that respect, as well as by identifying similarities and differences in the provision of childcare and eldercare in the national context, the article exposes developments and current state in childcare and eldercare provision in Serbia. The analysis indicates the profound role of the informal sphere in both care systems in Serbia, childcare and eldercare. Some differences between the two care domains could also be noted. These relate to the configuration of welfare sectors involved in care provision, revealing the modified shape of the care diamond in the case of childcare. That is, while all four sectors are involved in providing care in the case of eldercare forming an eldercare diamond, this is not the case with childcare. In the latter case, the voluntary, nonprofit sector does not exist as a care provider in Serbia, with childcare “architecture” having a shape of a care triangle. In light of this evidence, the role of families and the voluntary, nonprofit sector should be taken into account in future planning and funding of policies as well as in their implementation. Key words: care, childcare, eldercare, care diamond, policy, provision, Serbia
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
33 weeks
期刊最新文献
Understanding categories of postpartum care use among privately insured patients in the United States: a cluster-analytic approach. The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Migration Within the Countries of the European Union Učinci stambenog zbrinjavanja mlađe populacije na demografske trendove u Zagrebu Dimensions of the Universities Third Mission from the University Teachers and Students Perspective Interakcija financijskog razvitka, nejednakosti i rizika od siromaštva u Republici Hrvatskoj
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1