{"title":"伤人的话:为什么心理健康污名经常被诽谤,需要法律保护","authors":"Simon Katterl","doi":"10.1177/1037969X221150135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite a series of education programs and initiatives, mental health stigma persists across the community. This is due, in part, to the law’s silence on whether mental health stigma should be considered vilification. This article analyses current Australian anti-discrimination and anti-vilification protections, finding that the latter needs enhancing to include protections against mental health vilification.","PeriodicalId":44595,"journal":{"name":"Alternative Law Journal","volume":"48 1","pages":"47 - 54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Words that hurt: Why mental health stigma is often vilification, and requires legal protection\",\"authors\":\"Simon Katterl\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1037969X221150135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite a series of education programs and initiatives, mental health stigma persists across the community. This is due, in part, to the law’s silence on whether mental health stigma should be considered vilification. This article analyses current Australian anti-discrimination and anti-vilification protections, finding that the latter needs enhancing to include protections against mental health vilification.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alternative Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"47 - 54\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alternative Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X221150135\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternative Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X221150135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
Words that hurt: Why mental health stigma is often vilification, and requires legal protection
Despite a series of education programs and initiatives, mental health stigma persists across the community. This is due, in part, to the law’s silence on whether mental health stigma should be considered vilification. This article analyses current Australian anti-discrimination and anti-vilification protections, finding that the latter needs enhancing to include protections against mental health vilification.