对扑热息痛、盐酸伪麻黄碱和马来酸氯苯那敏三元混合物进行了不同的分离技术,并进一步定量

IF 1.7 4区 化学 Q3 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL Acta Chromatographica Pub Date : 2021-09-11 DOI:10.1556/1326.2021.00954
Joliana F Farid, N. Mostafa, Hebatallah M Essam, Y. Fayez
{"title":"对扑热息痛、盐酸伪麻黄碱和马来酸氯苯那敏三元混合物进行了不同的分离技术,并进一步定量","authors":"Joliana F Farid, N. Mostafa, Hebatallah M Essam, Y. Fayez","doi":"10.1556/1326.2021.00954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Due to the wide applicability of separation techniques that rely on the property of differential migration in pharmaceutical formulations analysis, different analytical strategies have been proposed to resolve mixtures of multi-components pharmaceuticals. Three separation methods were developed and validated for the simultaneous determination of Paracetamol (PAR), Pseudoephedrine HCl (PSE) and Chlorpheniramine maleate (CHP). The first method is a thin-layer chromatographic (TLC) separation, followed by densitometric measurement. The separation was carried out on aluminium sheet of silica gel 60 F254 using ethanol:chloroform:ammonia (1:7:0.4, by volume) as the mobile phase. Determination of PAR, PSE and CHP was successfully applied over the concentration ranges of 3–25 µg/band, 0.5–10 µg/band and 0.1–6 µg/band, respectively. The second method is HPLC separation that was achieved on C18 column using the mobile phase acetonitrile:phosphate buffer pH 5 (10:90, v/v) at a flow rate 1 mL min−1. PAR, PSE and CHP were determined by HPLC in concentration ranges of 5–400 μg mL−1, 2–40 μg mL−1 and 0.5–16 μg mL−1, respectively. The third method is a capillary electrophoresis (CE) separation. The electrophoretic separation was achieved using 20 mM phosphate buffer (pH 6.5) at 20 kV. The linearity was reached over concentration ranges of 30–250 μg mL−1, 5–50 μg mL−1 and 0.8–20 μg mL−1 for PAR, PSE and CHP, respectively. The developed methods were validated with respect to linearity, precision, accuracy and system suitability. The proposed methods were successfully applied for bulk powder and dosage form analysis with RSD of precision <2%. Moreover, statistical comparison with the official methods confirms the methods' validity.","PeriodicalId":7130,"journal":{"name":"Acta Chromatographica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of different separation techniques for resolving ternary mixture of Paracetamol, Pseudoephedrine Hydrochloride and Chlorpheniramine maleate with further quantification\",\"authors\":\"Joliana F Farid, N. Mostafa, Hebatallah M Essam, Y. Fayez\",\"doi\":\"10.1556/1326.2021.00954\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Due to the wide applicability of separation techniques that rely on the property of differential migration in pharmaceutical formulations analysis, different analytical strategies have been proposed to resolve mixtures of multi-components pharmaceuticals. Three separation methods were developed and validated for the simultaneous determination of Paracetamol (PAR), Pseudoephedrine HCl (PSE) and Chlorpheniramine maleate (CHP). The first method is a thin-layer chromatographic (TLC) separation, followed by densitometric measurement. The separation was carried out on aluminium sheet of silica gel 60 F254 using ethanol:chloroform:ammonia (1:7:0.4, by volume) as the mobile phase. Determination of PAR, PSE and CHP was successfully applied over the concentration ranges of 3–25 µg/band, 0.5–10 µg/band and 0.1–6 µg/band, respectively. The second method is HPLC separation that was achieved on C18 column using the mobile phase acetonitrile:phosphate buffer pH 5 (10:90, v/v) at a flow rate 1 mL min−1. PAR, PSE and CHP were determined by HPLC in concentration ranges of 5–400 μg mL−1, 2–40 μg mL−1 and 0.5–16 μg mL−1, respectively. The third method is a capillary electrophoresis (CE) separation. The electrophoretic separation was achieved using 20 mM phosphate buffer (pH 6.5) at 20 kV. The linearity was reached over concentration ranges of 30–250 μg mL−1, 5–50 μg mL−1 and 0.8–20 μg mL−1 for PAR, PSE and CHP, respectively. The developed methods were validated with respect to linearity, precision, accuracy and system suitability. The proposed methods were successfully applied for bulk powder and dosage form analysis with RSD of precision <2%. Moreover, statistical comparison with the official methods confirms the methods' validity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7130,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Chromatographica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Chromatographica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1556/1326.2021.00954\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Chromatographica","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/1326.2021.00954","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于依赖于差异迁移特性的分离技术在药物配方分析中的广泛适用性,已经提出了不同的分析策略来解决多组分药物的混合物。建立了同时测定对乙酰氨基酚(PAR)、伪麻黄碱(PSE)和马来酸氯苯那敏(CHP)的3种分离方法,并进行了验证。第一种方法是薄层色谱(TLC)分离,然后是密度测量。以乙醇:氯仿:氨气(体积比1:7:0.4)为流动相,在硅胶60f254铝片上进行分离。在3 ~ 25µg/波段、0.5 ~ 10µg/波段和0.1 ~ 6µg/波段范围内均可成功测定PAR、PSE和CHP。第二种方法是高效液相色谱分离,在C18柱上使用流动相乙腈:磷酸盐缓冲液pH 5 (10:90, v/v),流速1ml min - 1。高效液相色谱法测定PAR、PSE和CHP的浓度范围分别为5 ~ 400 μ mL−1、2 ~ 40 μ mL−1和0.5 ~ 16 μ mL−1。第三种方法是毛细管电泳(CE)分离。电泳分离采用20mm磷酸盐缓冲液(pH 6.5),电压为20kv。PAR、PSE和CHP分别在30 ~ 250 μ mL−1、5 ~ 50 μ mL−1和0.8 ~ 20 μ mL−1的浓度范围内呈线性关系。所开发的方法在线性度、精密度、准确度和系统适用性方面进行了验证。该方法可用于散装粉末和剂型分析,RSD精密度<2%。通过与官方方法的统计比较,证实了方法的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Implementation of different separation techniques for resolving ternary mixture of Paracetamol, Pseudoephedrine Hydrochloride and Chlorpheniramine maleate with further quantification
Due to the wide applicability of separation techniques that rely on the property of differential migration in pharmaceutical formulations analysis, different analytical strategies have been proposed to resolve mixtures of multi-components pharmaceuticals. Three separation methods were developed and validated for the simultaneous determination of Paracetamol (PAR), Pseudoephedrine HCl (PSE) and Chlorpheniramine maleate (CHP). The first method is a thin-layer chromatographic (TLC) separation, followed by densitometric measurement. The separation was carried out on aluminium sheet of silica gel 60 F254 using ethanol:chloroform:ammonia (1:7:0.4, by volume) as the mobile phase. Determination of PAR, PSE and CHP was successfully applied over the concentration ranges of 3–25 µg/band, 0.5–10 µg/band and 0.1–6 µg/band, respectively. The second method is HPLC separation that was achieved on C18 column using the mobile phase acetonitrile:phosphate buffer pH 5 (10:90, v/v) at a flow rate 1 mL min−1. PAR, PSE and CHP were determined by HPLC in concentration ranges of 5–400 μg mL−1, 2–40 μg mL−1 and 0.5–16 μg mL−1, respectively. The third method is a capillary electrophoresis (CE) separation. The electrophoretic separation was achieved using 20 mM phosphate buffer (pH 6.5) at 20 kV. The linearity was reached over concentration ranges of 30–250 μg mL−1, 5–50 μg mL−1 and 0.8–20 μg mL−1 for PAR, PSE and CHP, respectively. The developed methods were validated with respect to linearity, precision, accuracy and system suitability. The proposed methods were successfully applied for bulk powder and dosage form analysis with RSD of precision <2%. Moreover, statistical comparison with the official methods confirms the methods' validity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Chromatographica
Acta Chromatographica 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Acta Chromatographica Open Access Acta Chromatographica publishes peer-reviewed scientific articles on every field of chromatography, including theory of chromatography; progress in synthesis and characterization of new stationary phases; chromatography of organic, inorganic and complex compounds; enantioseparation and chromatography of chiral compounds; applications of chromatography in biology, pharmacy, medicine, and food analysis; environmental applications of chromatography; analytical and physico-chemical aspects of sample preparation for chromatography; hyphenated and combined techniques; chemometrics and its applications in separation science.
期刊最新文献
A comprehensive assessment of the biological attributes of and analytical quantification methods for monosodium glutamate Evaluation of the RP-LC method for determining the pKa of abiraterone and its assay Development, validation and greenness assessment of environmentally friendly analytical methods for the quantification of lenalidomide in pharmaceutical formulations Green RP-HPLC methods for assay and related substances in rivaroxaban tablets Simultaneous qualitative and quantitative analysis for evaluating constituents of Atractylodis macrocephalae rhizome by UPLC-QTOF-MS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1