偏置隐含波动率与派息股票

Thaddeus Neururer
{"title":"偏置隐含波动率与派息股票","authors":"Thaddeus Neururer","doi":"10.3905/jod.2023.1.181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, the author investigates the positive spread between option-implied and realized volatility (i.e., variance risk premiums) for dividend versus non-dividend-paying stocks. The author finds, unconditionally, dividend-paying stocks have lower implied volatilities and variance risk premiums compared with nonpayers. However, using subsamples based on implied volatility levels, the author documents that dividend-paying firms have higher conditional variance risk premiums relative to nonpaying firms. Stated differently, for the same level of implied volatility, the spread between implied and future realized volatilities is higher for firms that pay dividends compared with firms that do not. Multivariate tests suggest this result is not explained by option-implied skewness and kurtosis, a proxy for option mispricing, and fundamental risk factors. The results suggest that traders can generate higher risk-adjusted returns from shorting options on dividend-paying firms relative to nonpayers and investors should adjust dividend-paying firms’ implied volatilities down more compared with non-dividend-paying firms’ implied volatilities before performing portfolio optimizations.","PeriodicalId":34223,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Derivat","volume":"30 1","pages":"91 - 103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biased Implied Volatilities and Dividend-Paying Stocks\",\"authors\":\"Thaddeus Neururer\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/jod.2023.1.181\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this study, the author investigates the positive spread between option-implied and realized volatility (i.e., variance risk premiums) for dividend versus non-dividend-paying stocks. The author finds, unconditionally, dividend-paying stocks have lower implied volatilities and variance risk premiums compared with nonpayers. However, using subsamples based on implied volatility levels, the author documents that dividend-paying firms have higher conditional variance risk premiums relative to nonpaying firms. Stated differently, for the same level of implied volatility, the spread between implied and future realized volatilities is higher for firms that pay dividends compared with firms that do not. Multivariate tests suggest this result is not explained by option-implied skewness and kurtosis, a proxy for option mispricing, and fundamental risk factors. The results suggest that traders can generate higher risk-adjusted returns from shorting options on dividend-paying firms relative to nonpayers and investors should adjust dividend-paying firms’ implied volatilities down more compared with non-dividend-paying firms’ implied volatilities before performing portfolio optimizations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Derivat\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"91 - 103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Derivat\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/jod.2023.1.181\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Derivat","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jod.2023.1.181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本研究中,作者调查了股息股票与非股息股票的期权隐含波动率和已实现波动率(即方差风险溢价)之间的正价差。作者发现,与非派息股票相比,无条件派息股票具有较低的隐含波动性和方差风险溢价。然而,使用基于隐含波动水平的子样本,作者证明,与不分红公司相比,分红公司的条件方差风险溢价更高。换句话说,对于相同水平的隐含波动性,支付股息的公司与不支付股息的企业相比,隐含波动性与未来实现波动性之间的差异更大。多变量测试表明,这一结果并不能用期权隐含的偏度和峰度(期权定价错误的代表)以及基本风险因素来解释。研究结果表明,与非派息公司相比,交易员可以通过做空派息公司的期权产生更高的风险调整回报,投资者在进行投资组合优化之前,应将派息公司与非派股息公司的隐含波动率调低更多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Biased Implied Volatilities and Dividend-Paying Stocks
In this study, the author investigates the positive spread between option-implied and realized volatility (i.e., variance risk premiums) for dividend versus non-dividend-paying stocks. The author finds, unconditionally, dividend-paying stocks have lower implied volatilities and variance risk premiums compared with nonpayers. However, using subsamples based on implied volatility levels, the author documents that dividend-paying firms have higher conditional variance risk premiums relative to nonpaying firms. Stated differently, for the same level of implied volatility, the spread between implied and future realized volatilities is higher for firms that pay dividends compared with firms that do not. Multivariate tests suggest this result is not explained by option-implied skewness and kurtosis, a proxy for option mispricing, and fundamental risk factors. The results suggest that traders can generate higher risk-adjusted returns from shorting options on dividend-paying firms relative to nonpayers and investors should adjust dividend-paying firms’ implied volatilities down more compared with non-dividend-paying firms’ implied volatilities before performing portfolio optimizations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Lattice Approach for Option Pricing under Lévy Processes Caplets/Floorlets with Backward-Looking Risk-Free Rates under the One- and Two-Factor Hull-White Models Editor’s Letter Vol, Skew, and Smile Trading Option Valuation with Nonmonotonic Pricing Kernel and Embedded Volatility Component Premiums
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1