斯宾诺莎与爱的哲学

IF 0.7 3区 哲学 N/A PHILOSOPHY INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES Pub Date : 2022-08-08 DOI:10.1080/09672559.2022.2148229
Ian MacLean-Evans
{"title":"斯宾诺莎与爱的哲学","authors":"Ian MacLean-Evans","doi":"10.1080/09672559.2022.2148229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Strawser’s Spinoza and the Philosophy of Love is a long-needed investigation into what Spinoza has to say about love, how Spinoza’s views of love are historically situated, and how Spinoza’s views of love may have implications for how we ought to live today. To date, this aspect of Spinoza’s thought has not been the subject of a comprehensive book-length study, despite love being an important element of Spinoza’s moral philosophy. Strawser’s contribution in this book is thus both novel and needed in Spinoza scholarship, and holds within it many important observations about contemporary applications of Spinoza’s approach to interacting with others. Strawser claims his central argument is that Spinoza should be considered ‘predominantly a philosopher of love’ (2). To make this case, Strawser does not principally concern himself with Spinoza’s approval of the ‘intellectual love of God’. This might surprise Spinoza scholars who may assume he would focus on it, given the high esteem Spinoza offers of such. Rather, Strawser focuses on what he calls Spinoza’s theory of noble love. Strawser’s reading of noble love is principally developed in the book’s Introduction, and it is the ‘guide (of) the remaining study’ (17). The introduction is, then, the central portion of the book, and it is an impressive and vital resource for anyone looking at Spinoza’s moral philosophy generally, since it finds so much ethical weight in Spinoza’s philosophy of love. Yet, as we will see, the Introduction does not save a disagreement I have with some of Strawser’s later critique of Spinoza’s speciesism in Chapter 4 of the book. On Strawser’s reading, noble love is the kind of love that is expressed by nobility (generositas) whereby rational people aim to join together with other people in friendship and to increase their wellbeing. Strawser rightly justifies a reading of noble love by referring to Spinoza’s identification of love (amor) with nobility (generositas) through a number of passages, though most directly","PeriodicalId":51828,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spinoza and the Philosophy of Love\",\"authors\":\"Ian MacLean-Evans\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09672559.2022.2148229\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Strawser’s Spinoza and the Philosophy of Love is a long-needed investigation into what Spinoza has to say about love, how Spinoza’s views of love are historically situated, and how Spinoza’s views of love may have implications for how we ought to live today. To date, this aspect of Spinoza’s thought has not been the subject of a comprehensive book-length study, despite love being an important element of Spinoza’s moral philosophy. Strawser’s contribution in this book is thus both novel and needed in Spinoza scholarship, and holds within it many important observations about contemporary applications of Spinoza’s approach to interacting with others. Strawser claims his central argument is that Spinoza should be considered ‘predominantly a philosopher of love’ (2). To make this case, Strawser does not principally concern himself with Spinoza’s approval of the ‘intellectual love of God’. This might surprise Spinoza scholars who may assume he would focus on it, given the high esteem Spinoza offers of such. Rather, Strawser focuses on what he calls Spinoza’s theory of noble love. Strawser’s reading of noble love is principally developed in the book’s Introduction, and it is the ‘guide (of) the remaining study’ (17). The introduction is, then, the central portion of the book, and it is an impressive and vital resource for anyone looking at Spinoza’s moral philosophy generally, since it finds so much ethical weight in Spinoza’s philosophy of love. Yet, as we will see, the Introduction does not save a disagreement I have with some of Strawser’s later critique of Spinoza’s speciesism in Chapter 4 of the book. On Strawser’s reading, noble love is the kind of love that is expressed by nobility (generositas) whereby rational people aim to join together with other people in friendship and to increase their wellbeing. Strawser rightly justifies a reading of noble love by referring to Spinoza’s identification of love (amor) with nobility (generositas) through a number of passages, though most directly\",\"PeriodicalId\":51828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2022.2148229\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2022.2148229","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

斯特劳瑟的《斯宾诺莎与爱的哲学》是对斯宾诺莎对爱的看法、斯宾诺莎的爱观在历史上的地位以及斯宾诺莎爱观对我们今天应该如何生活的影响的一项长期需要的调查。迄今为止,尽管爱是斯宾诺莎道德哲学的一个重要元素,但斯宾诺莎思想的这一方面还没有成为一个全面的长篇研究的主题。因此,斯特劳瑟在这本书中的贡献既新颖,也是斯宾诺莎学术界所需要的,并在书中对斯宾诺莎与他人互动方法的当代应用进行了许多重要的观察。斯特劳斯声称他的中心论点是斯宾诺莎应该被认为是“主要的爱的哲学家”(2)。为了证明这一点,斯特劳斯并不主要关注斯宾诺莎对“理智的上帝之爱”的认可。这可能会让斯宾诺莎的学者们感到惊讶,他们可能会认为他会专注于此,因为斯宾诺莎对此给予了高度的尊重。相反,斯特劳斯专注于他所谓的斯宾诺莎的崇高爱情理论。斯特劳斯对崇高爱情的解读主要体现在该书的引言中,它是“剩余研究的指南”(17)。因此,引言是这本书的核心部分,对于任何审视斯宾诺莎道德哲学的人来说,这都是一个令人印象深刻的重要资源,因为它在斯宾诺莎的爱哲学中找到了如此多的伦理分量。然而,正如我们将看到的那样,引言并不能避免我与斯特劳瑟后来在本书第4章对斯宾诺莎的物种主义的一些批评之间的分歧。在斯特劳斯的阅读中,高尚的爱是由高尚(generaositas)表达的一种爱,理性的人旨在与其他人建立友谊,增进他们的幸福。斯特劳斯在许多段落中引用了斯宾诺莎对爱(amor)和高贵(generaositas)的认同,尽管这是最直接的,但他正确地证明了对崇高爱的解读是正确的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Spinoza and the Philosophy of Love
Strawser’s Spinoza and the Philosophy of Love is a long-needed investigation into what Spinoza has to say about love, how Spinoza’s views of love are historically situated, and how Spinoza’s views of love may have implications for how we ought to live today. To date, this aspect of Spinoza’s thought has not been the subject of a comprehensive book-length study, despite love being an important element of Spinoza’s moral philosophy. Strawser’s contribution in this book is thus both novel and needed in Spinoza scholarship, and holds within it many important observations about contemporary applications of Spinoza’s approach to interacting with others. Strawser claims his central argument is that Spinoza should be considered ‘predominantly a philosopher of love’ (2). To make this case, Strawser does not principally concern himself with Spinoza’s approval of the ‘intellectual love of God’. This might surprise Spinoza scholars who may assume he would focus on it, given the high esteem Spinoza offers of such. Rather, Strawser focuses on what he calls Spinoza’s theory of noble love. Strawser’s reading of noble love is principally developed in the book’s Introduction, and it is the ‘guide (of) the remaining study’ (17). The introduction is, then, the central portion of the book, and it is an impressive and vital resource for anyone looking at Spinoza’s moral philosophy generally, since it finds so much ethical weight in Spinoza’s philosophy of love. Yet, as we will see, the Introduction does not save a disagreement I have with some of Strawser’s later critique of Spinoza’s speciesism in Chapter 4 of the book. On Strawser’s reading, noble love is the kind of love that is expressed by nobility (generositas) whereby rational people aim to join together with other people in friendship and to increase their wellbeing. Strawser rightly justifies a reading of noble love by referring to Spinoza’s identification of love (amor) with nobility (generositas) through a number of passages, though most directly
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Philosophical Studies (IJPS) publishes academic articles of the highest quality from both analytic and continental traditions and provides a forum for publishing on a broader range of issues than is currently available in philosophical journals. IJPS also publishes annual special issues devoted to key thematic areas or to critical engagements with contemporary philosophers of note. Through its Discussion section, it provides a lively forum for exchange of ideas and encourages dialogue and mutual comprehension across all philosophical traditions. The journal also contains an extensive book review section, including occasional book symposia. It also provides Critical Notices which review major books or themes in depth.
期刊最新文献
Nietzsche and the Size of Future History as a Normative Criterion Becoming Foucault: The Poitiers Years Transgenerational Frontiers: The Capabilities Approach And the New Challenge of Justice Intuitional Content or Avoiding the Myth of the Given – A Dilemma for McDowell Ethics in the Gray Area: A Gradualist Theory of Right and Wrong Ethics in the Gray Area: A Gradualist Theory of Right and Wrong , by Martin Peterson, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2023, 236 pp., £85.00 (hbk), ISBN 9781009336789
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1