文化记忆、白色纯真与美国领土:2022年城市地理学全体讲座

IF 2.9 2区 经济学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Urban Geography Pub Date : 2023-04-28 DOI:10.1080/02723638.2023.2203585
L. Pulido
{"title":"文化记忆、白色纯真与美国领土:2022年城市地理学全体讲座","authors":"L. Pulido","doi":"10.1080/02723638.2023.2203585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this paper, I explore how hegemonic forms of cultural memory in the United States, specifically, National Historic Landmarks, represent white supremacy and colonization. National Historic Landmarks are a particular form of commemoration that, according to the National Park Service, “represent an outstanding aspect of American history and culture and embod[y] national significance.” We examined how such sites represent white supremacy and colonization, based on the nomination materials as well as fieldwork, especially in terms of territorial development. Through our analysis, we identified four primary forms of representation: erasure, valorization, multiculturalism, and acknowledgement. Erasure, valorization, and acknowledgement all constitute denial, albeit in distinct ways. Altogether, over 90% of all National Historic Landmarks denied white supremacy and colonization. I argue that such monumental denial is essential to reproducing white innocence; acknowledging the racial violence embedded in the territorial development of the United States would constitute a crisis for the white nation.","PeriodicalId":48178,"journal":{"name":"Urban Geography","volume":"44 1","pages":"1059 - 1083"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cultural memory, white innocence, and United States territory: the 2022 Urban Geography Plenary Lecture\",\"authors\":\"L. Pulido\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02723638.2023.2203585\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In this paper, I explore how hegemonic forms of cultural memory in the United States, specifically, National Historic Landmarks, represent white supremacy and colonization. National Historic Landmarks are a particular form of commemoration that, according to the National Park Service, “represent an outstanding aspect of American history and culture and embod[y] national significance.” We examined how such sites represent white supremacy and colonization, based on the nomination materials as well as fieldwork, especially in terms of territorial development. Through our analysis, we identified four primary forms of representation: erasure, valorization, multiculturalism, and acknowledgement. Erasure, valorization, and acknowledgement all constitute denial, albeit in distinct ways. Altogether, over 90% of all National Historic Landmarks denied white supremacy and colonization. I argue that such monumental denial is essential to reproducing white innocence; acknowledging the racial violence embedded in the territorial development of the United States would constitute a crisis for the white nation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urban Geography\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"1059 - 1083\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urban Geography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2023.2203585\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Geography","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2023.2203585","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在本文中,我探讨了美国文化记忆的霸权形式,特别是国家历史地标,如何代表白人至上主义和殖民主义。根据国家公园管理局的说法,国家历史地标是一种特殊的纪念形式,“代表了美国历史和文化的一个突出方面,体现了国家的重要性。”我们根据提名材料和实地调查,特别是在领土发展方面,研究了这些遗址是如何代表白人至上主义和殖民主义的。通过我们的分析,我们确定了四种主要的表现形式:擦除、增值、多元文化主义和承认。擦除、增值和承认都构成否认,尽管方式不同。总的来说,超过90%的国家历史地标否定了白人至上主义和殖民主义。我认为,这种巨大的否认对于再现白人的纯真至关重要;承认美国领土开发过程中存在的种族暴力将给这个白人国家带来危机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cultural memory, white innocence, and United States territory: the 2022 Urban Geography Plenary Lecture
ABSTRACT In this paper, I explore how hegemonic forms of cultural memory in the United States, specifically, National Historic Landmarks, represent white supremacy and colonization. National Historic Landmarks are a particular form of commemoration that, according to the National Park Service, “represent an outstanding aspect of American history and culture and embod[y] national significance.” We examined how such sites represent white supremacy and colonization, based on the nomination materials as well as fieldwork, especially in terms of territorial development. Through our analysis, we identified four primary forms of representation: erasure, valorization, multiculturalism, and acknowledgement. Erasure, valorization, and acknowledgement all constitute denial, albeit in distinct ways. Altogether, over 90% of all National Historic Landmarks denied white supremacy and colonization. I argue that such monumental denial is essential to reproducing white innocence; acknowledging the racial violence embedded in the territorial development of the United States would constitute a crisis for the white nation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urban Geography
Urban Geography Multiple-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
104
期刊介绍: Editorial Policy. Urban Geography publishes research articles covering a wide range of topics and approaches of interest to urban geographers. Articles should be relevant, timely, and well-designed, should have broad significance, and should demonstrate originality.
期刊最新文献
“Regarding the pain of others”: urban geography after empathy Rental sector liberalization and the housing outcomes for young urban adults Included or left behind? Residents’ perceptions on public investments, city growth, and local decision-making Animating the urban: between infrastructure and encounter Contemporary urban employment patterns among Chinese peasant workers in the 2020s
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1