激进废奴研究中的黑人废奴理论:颠覆统治的实践、结构和认知

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal for Multicultural Education Pub Date : 2023-07-03 DOI:10.1108/jme-01-2023-0002
Kia Turner, Darion Wallace, Danielle Miles-Langaigne, Essence Deras
{"title":"激进废奴研究中的黑人废奴理论:颠覆统治的实践、结构和认知","authors":"Kia Turner, Darion Wallace, Danielle Miles-Langaigne, Essence Deras","doi":"10.1108/jme-01-2023-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to present radical abolition studies, which encourages us to (re)member that the abolition of institutions and systems is incomplete without the abolition of their attendant epistemes of domination. The authors draw on the etymology of the word radical to encourage abolitionist praxis to grab systemic harm at its epistemological roots. Within radical abolition studies, this study presents Black abolition theory, which aims to make explicit a theorization of Blackness and works to abolish the episteme of anti-Blackness.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis paper offers Black abolition theory within radical abolition studies to reground abolition in its Black theoretical roots and to interrogate the concept of anti-Blackness and other epistemes of domination in abolitionist study and practice. Using a close reading of W.E.B. Du Bois’ Black Reconstruction, and subsequent books and articles in abolition studies and educational studies that reference it, the authors highlight Du Bois’ original conceptualization of abolitionism as an ultimate refutation of a racial-social order and anti-Blackness. The authors then put Michael Dumas and kihana ross’ theory of BlackCrit into conversation with abolitionist and educational theory to push forward Black abolition theory.\n\n\nFindings\nRadical abolition studies and its attendant strand of Black abolition theory presented in this paper encourages scholars and practitioners to go beyond the dismantling of current instantiations of systemic harm for Black and other minoritized people – such as the school as it currently operates – and encourages the questioning and dismantling of the epistemes of domination sitting at the foundation of these systems of harm.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nBlack abolition theory contextualizes abolition in education by rooting abolitionist educational praxis in Black lineages. More generally, radical abolition studies encourages further research, study and collaboration in partnership with others who have historically participated in the fight against being labeled as subhuman to upend all epistemes of domination.\n","PeriodicalId":43323,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Multicultural Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward Black abolition theory within radical abolition studies: upending practices, structures, and epistemes of domination\",\"authors\":\"Kia Turner, Darion Wallace, Danielle Miles-Langaigne, Essence Deras\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jme-01-2023-0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis study aims to present radical abolition studies, which encourages us to (re)member that the abolition of institutions and systems is incomplete without the abolition of their attendant epistemes of domination. The authors draw on the etymology of the word radical to encourage abolitionist praxis to grab systemic harm at its epistemological roots. Within radical abolition studies, this study presents Black abolition theory, which aims to make explicit a theorization of Blackness and works to abolish the episteme of anti-Blackness.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis paper offers Black abolition theory within radical abolition studies to reground abolition in its Black theoretical roots and to interrogate the concept of anti-Blackness and other epistemes of domination in abolitionist study and practice. Using a close reading of W.E.B. Du Bois’ Black Reconstruction, and subsequent books and articles in abolition studies and educational studies that reference it, the authors highlight Du Bois’ original conceptualization of abolitionism as an ultimate refutation of a racial-social order and anti-Blackness. The authors then put Michael Dumas and kihana ross’ theory of BlackCrit into conversation with abolitionist and educational theory to push forward Black abolition theory.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nRadical abolition studies and its attendant strand of Black abolition theory presented in this paper encourages scholars and practitioners to go beyond the dismantling of current instantiations of systemic harm for Black and other minoritized people – such as the school as it currently operates – and encourages the questioning and dismantling of the epistemes of domination sitting at the foundation of these systems of harm.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nBlack abolition theory contextualizes abolition in education by rooting abolitionist educational praxis in Black lineages. More generally, radical abolition studies encourages further research, study and collaboration in partnership with others who have historically participated in the fight against being labeled as subhuman to upend all epistemes of domination.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":43323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Multicultural Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Multicultural Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jme-01-2023-0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Multicultural Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jme-01-2023-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在提出激进的废除研究,鼓励我们(重新)认识到,如果不废除伴随而来的统治认知,制度和制度的废除是不完整的。作者利用单词radical的词源来鼓励废除主义者的实践从其认识论根源上抓住系统性伤害。在激进废奴研究中,本研究提出了黑人废奴理论,旨在明确黑人的理论化,并致力于废除反黑人的认识论。本文在激进废奴研究中提供黑人废奴理论,以重新审视废奴的黑人理论根源,并对废奴主义研究和实践中的反黑人概念和其他统治认知进行质疑。通过仔细阅读W.E.B.杜波依斯的《黑人重建》,以及随后在废奴研究和教育研究中引用的书籍和文章,作者强调了杜波依斯对废奴主义的最初概念是对种族社会秩序和反黑人的最终反驳。然后将杜马和罗斯的黑人批判理论与废奴主义和教育理论进行对话,推动黑人废奴理论的发展。论文中提出的激进废奴研究及其相关的黑人废奴理论鼓励学者和实践者超越对黑人和其他少数群体的系统性伤害的当前实例的拆除-例如目前运作的学校-并鼓励质疑和拆除位于这些伤害系统基础上的统治知识。原创性/价值黑人废奴理论将废奴主义教育实践根植于黑人血统,从而将废奴主义置于教育语境之中。更广泛地说,激进废除研究鼓励进一步的研究,研究和合作,与其他历史上参与反对被贴上非人标签的斗争,以颠覆所有统治的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Toward Black abolition theory within radical abolition studies: upending practices, structures, and epistemes of domination
Purpose This study aims to present radical abolition studies, which encourages us to (re)member that the abolition of institutions and systems is incomplete without the abolition of their attendant epistemes of domination. The authors draw on the etymology of the word radical to encourage abolitionist praxis to grab systemic harm at its epistemological roots. Within radical abolition studies, this study presents Black abolition theory, which aims to make explicit a theorization of Blackness and works to abolish the episteme of anti-Blackness. Design/methodology/approach This paper offers Black abolition theory within radical abolition studies to reground abolition in its Black theoretical roots and to interrogate the concept of anti-Blackness and other epistemes of domination in abolitionist study and practice. Using a close reading of W.E.B. Du Bois’ Black Reconstruction, and subsequent books and articles in abolition studies and educational studies that reference it, the authors highlight Du Bois’ original conceptualization of abolitionism as an ultimate refutation of a racial-social order and anti-Blackness. The authors then put Michael Dumas and kihana ross’ theory of BlackCrit into conversation with abolitionist and educational theory to push forward Black abolition theory. Findings Radical abolition studies and its attendant strand of Black abolition theory presented in this paper encourages scholars and practitioners to go beyond the dismantling of current instantiations of systemic harm for Black and other minoritized people – such as the school as it currently operates – and encourages the questioning and dismantling of the epistemes of domination sitting at the foundation of these systems of harm. Originality/value Black abolition theory contextualizes abolition in education by rooting abolitionist educational praxis in Black lineages. More generally, radical abolition studies encourages further research, study and collaboration in partnership with others who have historically participated in the fight against being labeled as subhuman to upend all epistemes of domination.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal for Multicultural Education
Journal for Multicultural Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
18.20%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The Journal for Multicultural Education is a double-blind peer reviewed journal. Published quarterly, the editorial objectives and coverage focus on: Fostering research into the management of multicultural education, understanding multicultural education in the context of teacher-learner equity and enabling learners to collaborate more effectively across ethnic, cultural and linguistic lines. Topics covered include: -Intercultural education- Inclusive education- Urban education- Diversity in education- Ethnicity in education- Gender and education- Disability and education- Technology and Multicultural education The journal is international in coverage and publishes original, theoretical and applied articles by leading scholars, expert consultants and respected practitioners.
期刊最新文献
Fostering newly resettled refugee-background adolescents’ self-efficacy and advocacy in a community-based youth program Venezuelan migration to Brazil: teachers and students co-constructing multicultural education inside classrooms The relationship between classroom racial/ethnic composition and teacher perceptions of work conditions “I am afflicted with the evil eye!” How Islamic cultural beliefs influence college students’ perceptions of their academic experience The significance of ethnomathematics learning: a cross-cultural perspectives between Indonesian and Thailand educators
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1