一个梦想的男孩,或者:被权力所陶醉

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 Q4 Arts and Humanities RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2021-05-04 DOI:10.1080/10611967.2021.1973317
Vladimir V. Mironov, Dagmar Mironowa
{"title":"一个梦想的男孩,或者:被权力所陶醉","authors":"Vladimir V. Mironov, Dagmar Mironowa","doi":"10.1080/10611967.2021.1973317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article analyzes the issues associated with the publication of Martin Heidegger’s Black Notebooks. We attempt to explain the very publication of this document as a kind of experiment the philosopher conducted on himself and his future readers. It represents a unique form of “deferred” thought that brings us the content of a bygone era, albeit necessarily refracted through contemporary perception. What ensures the integrity of this experiment is, on the one hand, the physical “absence of the author,” who cannot himself influence assessments of his text and actions, and on the other hand, a simultaneous “return of the author,” since his opinion must be taken into account. This thus serves as a kind of refutation of the postmodern “death of the author,” as his thoughts must be taken into account even in the case of his physical absence. We also investigate the problem of the philosopher’s ideological “intoxication” with the ideas of the National Socialist revolution, as manifested in his activities as a philosopher-ideologist while serving as Rector at the University of Freiburg. We analyze a number of the philosopher’s speeches in that regard and touch on the question of his responsibility for the ideas he “cast” into the world.","PeriodicalId":42094,"journal":{"name":"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY","volume":"59 1","pages":"220 - 242"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eine Knabe, der träumt, or: Intoxicated by Power\",\"authors\":\"Vladimir V. Mironov, Dagmar Mironowa\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10611967.2021.1973317\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article analyzes the issues associated with the publication of Martin Heidegger’s Black Notebooks. We attempt to explain the very publication of this document as a kind of experiment the philosopher conducted on himself and his future readers. It represents a unique form of “deferred” thought that brings us the content of a bygone era, albeit necessarily refracted through contemporary perception. What ensures the integrity of this experiment is, on the one hand, the physical “absence of the author,” who cannot himself influence assessments of his text and actions, and on the other hand, a simultaneous “return of the author,” since his opinion must be taken into account. This thus serves as a kind of refutation of the postmodern “death of the author,” as his thoughts must be taken into account even in the case of his physical absence. We also investigate the problem of the philosopher’s ideological “intoxication” with the ideas of the National Socialist revolution, as manifested in his activities as a philosopher-ideologist while serving as Rector at the University of Freiburg. We analyze a number of the philosopher’s speeches in that regard and touch on the question of his responsibility for the ideas he “cast” into the world.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"220 - 242\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611967.2021.1973317\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN PHILOSOPHY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611967.2021.1973317","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文分析了与海德格尔《黑色笔记》出版有关的问题。我们试图将这份文件的出版解释为哲学家对自己和未来读者进行的一种实验。它代表了一种独特的“递延”思想形式,它给我们带来了过去时代的内容,尽管必然通过当代的感知来折射。一方面,确保这项实验完整性的是“作者的身体缺席”,他自己不能影响对其文本和行为的评估,另一方面,同时“作者的回归”,因为必须考虑到他的意见。因此,这是对后现代“作者之死”的一种反驳,因为即使在他身体不在的情况下,也必须考虑到他的思想。我们还调查了哲学家对国家社会主义革命思想的意识形态“陶醉”问题,这表现在他担任弗赖堡大学校长期间作为哲学家和思想家的活动中。我们分析了这位哲学家在这方面的一些演讲,并谈到了他对自己“灌输”到世界上的思想的责任问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Eine Knabe, der träumt, or: Intoxicated by Power
ABSTRACT This article analyzes the issues associated with the publication of Martin Heidegger’s Black Notebooks. We attempt to explain the very publication of this document as a kind of experiment the philosopher conducted on himself and his future readers. It represents a unique form of “deferred” thought that brings us the content of a bygone era, albeit necessarily refracted through contemporary perception. What ensures the integrity of this experiment is, on the one hand, the physical “absence of the author,” who cannot himself influence assessments of his text and actions, and on the other hand, a simultaneous “return of the author,” since his opinion must be taken into account. This thus serves as a kind of refutation of the postmodern “death of the author,” as his thoughts must be taken into account even in the case of his physical absence. We also investigate the problem of the philosopher’s ideological “intoxication” with the ideas of the National Socialist revolution, as manifested in his activities as a philosopher-ideologist while serving as Rector at the University of Freiburg. We analyze a number of the philosopher’s speeches in that regard and touch on the question of his responsibility for the ideas he “cast” into the world.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Russian Studies in Philosophy publishes thematic issues featuring selected scholarly papers from conferences and joint research projects as well as from the leading Russian-language journals in philosophy. Thematic coverage ranges over significant theoretical topics as well as topics in the history of philosophy, both European and Russian, including issues focused on institutions, schools, and figures such as Bakhtin, Fedorov, Leontev, Losev, Rozanov, Solovev, and Zinovev.
期刊最新文献
Concluding Russian Studies in Philosophy: An Eye Towards the Future The Concept of Perfection in Lev Karsavin’s Religious Metaphysics Variants of Images of the Future in the Work of Lev P. Karsavin Lev Karsavin: Russian Religiosity and Russian Revolution The Metaphysical Path: Lev P. Karsavin’s Philosophical Experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1