R. Sanaei, Kevin Otto, Katja Hölttä-Otto, Kristin Wood
{"title":"约束下系统模块化的强化学习方法","authors":"R. Sanaei, Kevin Otto, Katja Hölttä-Otto, Kristin Wood","doi":"10.1002/sys.21666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modularization is an approach for system architecting and design simplification by encapsulating complex interactions among components within modules and reducing dependencies across modules. Design structure matrix (DSM) based clustering algorithms have proven helpful for such analysis, owing to their convenience in manipulating a large number of elements using conventional software. However, there are problems where constraints must be maintained in the modularization, for example, coping with functions or systems that either cannot or must be performed in regions with excessive heat, pressure, magnetic or other fields. Excluding such field boundary considerations can result in DSM computed modular architectural solutions that bundle field‐incompatible functions or components that are not practical. Such regional field constraint considerations are not taken into account using conventional DSM clustering algorithms. We introduce a DSM‐based clustering algorithm that incorporates these practical embodiment constraints through a constraint matrix indicating which elements can or cannot be placed in the same field region. We then employ reinforcement learning to allow the clustering algorithm to exploit its learnings from the previous attempts and during the clustering to facilitate the optimization under constraints. We demonstrate two examples of a medical contrast injector and the controller board of a three‐phase pump motor.","PeriodicalId":54439,"journal":{"name":"Systems Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A reinforcement learning approach to system modularization under constraints\",\"authors\":\"R. Sanaei, Kevin Otto, Katja Hölttä-Otto, Kristin Wood\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/sys.21666\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Modularization is an approach for system architecting and design simplification by encapsulating complex interactions among components within modules and reducing dependencies across modules. Design structure matrix (DSM) based clustering algorithms have proven helpful for such analysis, owing to their convenience in manipulating a large number of elements using conventional software. However, there are problems where constraints must be maintained in the modularization, for example, coping with functions or systems that either cannot or must be performed in regions with excessive heat, pressure, magnetic or other fields. Excluding such field boundary considerations can result in DSM computed modular architectural solutions that bundle field‐incompatible functions or components that are not practical. Such regional field constraint considerations are not taken into account using conventional DSM clustering algorithms. We introduce a DSM‐based clustering algorithm that incorporates these practical embodiment constraints through a constraint matrix indicating which elements can or cannot be placed in the same field region. We then employ reinforcement learning to allow the clustering algorithm to exploit its learnings from the previous attempts and during the clustering to facilitate the optimization under constraints. We demonstrate two examples of a medical contrast injector and the controller board of a three‐phase pump motor.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Systems Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Systems Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21666\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systems Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21666","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
A reinforcement learning approach to system modularization under constraints
Modularization is an approach for system architecting and design simplification by encapsulating complex interactions among components within modules and reducing dependencies across modules. Design structure matrix (DSM) based clustering algorithms have proven helpful for such analysis, owing to their convenience in manipulating a large number of elements using conventional software. However, there are problems where constraints must be maintained in the modularization, for example, coping with functions or systems that either cannot or must be performed in regions with excessive heat, pressure, magnetic or other fields. Excluding such field boundary considerations can result in DSM computed modular architectural solutions that bundle field‐incompatible functions or components that are not practical. Such regional field constraint considerations are not taken into account using conventional DSM clustering algorithms. We introduce a DSM‐based clustering algorithm that incorporates these practical embodiment constraints through a constraint matrix indicating which elements can or cannot be placed in the same field region. We then employ reinforcement learning to allow the clustering algorithm to exploit its learnings from the previous attempts and during the clustering to facilitate the optimization under constraints. We demonstrate two examples of a medical contrast injector and the controller board of a three‐phase pump motor.
期刊介绍:
Systems Engineering is a discipline whose responsibility it is to create and operate technologically enabled systems that satisfy stakeholder needs throughout their life cycle. Systems engineers reduce ambiguity by clearly defining stakeholder needs and customer requirements, they focus creativity by developing a system’s architecture and design and they manage the system’s complexity over time. Considerations taken into account by systems engineers include, among others, quality, cost and schedule, risk and opportunity under uncertainty, manufacturing and realization, performance and safety during operations, training and support, as well as disposal and recycling at the end of life. The journal welcomes original submissions in the field of Systems Engineering as defined above, but also encourages contributions that take an even broader perspective including the design and operation of systems-of-systems, the application of Systems Engineering to enterprises and complex socio-technical systems, the identification, selection and development of systems engineers as well as the evolution of systems and systems-of-systems over their entire lifecycle.
Systems Engineering integrates all the disciplines and specialty groups into a coordinated team effort forming a structured development process that proceeds from concept to realization to operation. Increasingly important topics in Systems Engineering include the role of executable languages and models of systems, the concurrent use of physical and virtual prototyping, as well as the deployment of agile processes. Systems Engineering considers both the business and the technical needs of all stakeholders with the goal of providing a quality product that meets the user needs. Systems Engineering may be applied not only to products and services in the private sector but also to public infrastructures and socio-technical systems whose precise boundaries are often challenging to define.